Tag Archives: Israel

King Jew Netanyahu’s Full Speech to the US Congress (Plus Transcript)

Daily Stormer
March 4, 2015

Below is the full transcript of the evil Jew King Bibi Netanyahu’s speech to the US congress, which was given yesterday without the approval of the President of the United States.

Much analysis to come.

NETANYAHU: Thank you.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you…

(APPLAUSE)

… Speaker of the House John Boehner, President Pro Tem Senator Orrin Hatch, Senator Minority — Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

I also want to acknowledge Senator, Democratic Leader Harry Reid. Harry, it’s good to see you back on your feet.

(APPLAUSE)

I guess it’s true what they say, you can’t keep a good man down.

(LAUGHTER)

My friends, I’m deeply humbled by the opportunity to speak for a third time before the most important legislative body in the world, the U.S. Congress.

(APPLAUSE)

I want to thank you all for being here today. I know that my speech has been the subject of much controversy. I deeply regret that some perceive my being here as political. That was never my intention.

I want to thank you, Democrats and Republicans, for your common support for Israel, year after year, decade after decade.

(APPLAUSE)

I know that no matter on which side of the aisle you sit, you stand with Israel.

(APPLAUSE)

The remarkable alliance between Israel and the United States has always been above politics. It must always remain above politics.

(APPLAUSE)

Because America and Israel, we share a common destiny, the destiny of promised lands that cherish freedom and offer hope. Israel is grateful for the support of American — of America’s people and of America’s presidents, from Harry Truman to Barack Obama.

(APPLAUSE)

We appreciate all that President Obama has done for Israel.

Now, some of that is widely known.

(APPLAUSE)

Some of that is widely known, like strengthening security cooperation and intelligence sharing, opposing anti-Israel resolutions at the U.N.

Some of what the president has done for Israel is less well- known.

I called him in 2010 when we had the Carmel forest fire, and he immediately agreed to respond to my request for urgent aid.

In 2011, we had our embassy in Cairo under siege, and again, he provided vital assistance at the crucial moment.

Or his support for more missile interceptors during our operation last summer when we took on Hamas terrorists.

(APPLAUSE)

In each of those moments, I called the president, and he was there.

And some of what the president has done for Israel might never be known, because it touches on some of the most sensitive and strategic issues that arise between an American president and an Israeli prime minister.

But I know it, and I will always be grateful to President Obama for that support.

(APPLAUSE)

And Israel is grateful to you, the American Congress, for your support, for supporting us in so many ways, especially in generous military assistance and missile defense, including Iron Dome.

(APPLAUSE)

Last summer, millions of Israelis were protected from thousands of Hamas rockets because this capital dome helped build our Iron Dome.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you, America. Thank you for everything you’ve done for Israel.

My friends, I’ve come here today because, as prime minister of Israel, I feel a profound obligation to speak to you about an issue that could well threaten the survival of my country and the future of my people: Iran’s quest for nuclear weapons.

We’re an ancient people. In our nearly 4,000 years of history, many have tried repeatedly to destroy the Jewish people. Tomorrow night, on the Jewish holiday of Purim, we’ll read the Book of Esther. We’ll read of a powerful Persian viceroy named Haman, who plotted to destroy the Jewish people some 2,500 years ago. But a courageous Jewish woman, Queen Esther, exposed the plot and gave for the Jewish people the right to defend themselves against their enemies.

The plot was foiled. Our people were saved.

(APPLAUSE)

Today the Jewish people face another attempt by yet another Persian potentate to destroy us. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei spews the oldest hatred, the oldest hatred of anti-Semitism with the newest technology. He tweets that Israel must be annihilated — he tweets. You know, in Iran, there isn’t exactly free Internet. But he tweets in English that Israel must be destroyed.

For those who believe that Iran threatens the Jewish state, but not the Jewish people, listen to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, Iran’s chief terrorist proxy. He said: If all the Jews gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of chasing them down around the world.

But Iran’s regime is not merely a Jewish problem, any more than the Nazi regime was merely a Jewish problem. The 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis were but a fraction of the 60 million people killed in World War II. So, too, Iran’s regime poses a grave threat, not only to Israel, but also the peace of the entire world. To understand just how dangerous Iran would be with nuclear weapons, we must fully understand the nature of the regime.

The people of Iran are very talented people. They’re heirs to one of the world’s great civilizations. But in 1979, they were hijacked by religious zealots — religious zealots who imposed on them immediately a dark and brutal dictatorship.

That year, the zealots drafted a constitution, a new one for Iran. It directed the revolutionary guards not only to protect Iran’s borders, but also to fulfill the ideological mission of jihad. The regime’s founder, Ayatollah Khomeini, exhorted his followers to “export the revolution throughout the world.”

I’m standing here in Washington, D.C. and the difference is so stark. America’s founding document promises life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Iran’s founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad. And as states are collapsing across the Middle East, Iran is charging into the void to do just that.

Iran’s goons in Gaza, its lackeys in Lebanon, its revolutionary guards on the Golan Heights are clutching Israel with three tentacles of terror. Backed by Iran, Assad is slaughtering Syrians. Back by Iran, Shiite militias are rampaging through Iraq. Back by Iran, Houthis are seizing control of Yemen, threatening the strategic straits at the mouth of the Red Sea. Along with the Straits of Hormuz, that would give Iran a second choke-point on the world’s oil supply.

Just last week, near Hormuz, Iran carried out a military exercise blowing up a mock U.S. aircraft carrier. That’s just last week, while they’re having nuclear talks with the United States. But unfortunately, for the last 36 years, Iran’s attacks against the United States have been anything but mock. And the targets have been all too real.

Iran took dozens of Americans hostage in Tehran, murdered hundreds of American soldiers, Marines, in Beirut, and was responsible for killing and maiming thousands of American service men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Beyond the Middle East, Iran attacks America and its allies through its global terror network. It blew up the Jewish community center and the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires. It helped Al Qaida bomb U.S. embassies in Africa. It even attempted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador, right here in Washington, D.C.

In the Middle East, Iran now dominates four Arab capitals, Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut and Sanaa. And if Iran’s aggression is left unchecked, more will surely follow.

So, at a time when many hope that Iran will join the community of nations, Iran is busy gobbling up the nations.

(APPLAUSE)

We must all stand together to stop Iran’s march of conquest, subjugation and terror.

(APPLAUSE)

Now, two years ago, we were told to give President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif a chance to bring change and moderation to Iran. Some change! Some moderation!

Rouhani’s government hangs gays, persecutes Christians, jails journalists and executes even more prisoners than before.

Last year, the same Zarif who charms Western diplomats laid a wreath at the grave of Imad Mughniyeh. Imad Mughniyeh is the terrorist mastermind who spilled more American blood than any other terrorist besides Osama bin Laden. I’d like to see someone ask him a question about that.

Iran’s regime is as radical as ever, its cries of “Death to America,” that same America that it calls the “Great Satan,” as loud as ever.

Now, this shouldn’t be surprising, because the ideology of Iran’s revolutionary regime is deeply rooted in militant Islam, and that’s why this regime will always be an enemy of America.

Don’t be fooled. The battle between Iran and ISIS doesn’t turn Iran into a friend of America.

Iran and ISIS are competing for the crown of militant Islam. One calls itself the Islamic Republic. The other calls itself the Islamic State. Both want to impose a militant Islamic empire first on the region and then on the entire world. They just disagree among themselves who will be the ruler of that empire.

In this deadly game of thrones, there’s no place for America or for Israel, no peace for Christians, Jews or Muslims who don’t share the Islamist medieval creed, no rights for women, no freedom for anyone.

So when it comes to Iran and ISIS, the enemy of your enemy is your enemy.

(APPLAUSE)

The difference is that ISIS is armed with butcher knives, captured weapons and YouTube, whereas Iran could soon be armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles and nuclear bombs. We must always remember — I’ll say it one more time — the greatest dangers facing our world is the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons. To defeat ISIS and let Iran get nuclear weapons would be to win the battle, but lose the war. We can’t let that happen.

(APPLAUSE)

But that, my friends, is exactly what could happen, if the deal now being negotiated is accepted by Iran. That deal will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It would all but guarantee that Iran gets those weapons, lots of them.

Let me explain why. While the final deal has not yet been signed, certain elements of any potential deal are now a matter of public record. You don’t need intelligence agencies and secret information to know this. You can Google it.

Absent a dramatic change, we know for sure that any deal with Iran will include two major concessions to Iran.

The first major concession would leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure, providing it with a short break-out time to the bomb. Break-out time is the time it takes to amass enough weapons-grade uranium or plutonium for a nuclear bomb.

According to the deal, not a single nuclear facility would be demolished. Thousands of centrifuges used to enrich uranium would be left spinning. Thousands more would be temporarily disconnected, but not destroyed.

Because Iran’s nuclear program would be left largely intact, Iran’s break-out time would be very short — about a year by U.S. assessment, even shorter by Israel’s.

And if — if Iran’s work on advanced centrifuges, faster and faster centrifuges, is not stopped, that break-out time could still be shorter, a lot shorter.

True, certain restrictions would be imposed on Iran’s nuclear program and Iran’s adherence to those restrictions would be supervised by international inspectors. But here’s the problem. You see, inspectors document violations; they don’t stop them.

Inspectors knew when North Korea broke to the bomb, but that didn’t stop anything. North Korea turned off the cameras, kicked out the inspectors. Within a few years, it got the bomb.

Now, we’re warned that within five years North Korea could have an arsenal of 100 nuclear bombs.

Like North Korea, Iran, too, has defied international inspectors. It’s done that on at least three separate occasions — 2005, 2006, 2010. Like North Korea, Iran broke the locks, shut off the cameras.

Now, I know this is not gonna come a shock — as a shock to any of you, but Iran not only defies inspectors, it also plays a pretty good game of hide-and-cheat with them.

The U.N.’s nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, said again yesterday that Iran still refuses to come clean about its military nuclear program. Iran was also caught — caught twice, not once, twice — operating secret nuclear facilities in Natanz and Qom, facilities that inspectors didn’t even know existed.

Right now, Iran could be hiding nuclear facilities that we don’t know about, the U.S. and Israel. As the former head of inspections for the IAEA said in 2013, he said, “If there’s no undeclared installation today in Iran, it will be the first time in 20 years that it doesn’t have one.” Iran has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted. And that’s why the first major concession is a source of great concern. It leaves Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and relies on inspectors to prevent a breakout. That concession creates a real danger that Iran could get to the bomb by violating the deal.

But the second major concession creates an even greater danger that Iran could get to the bomb by keeping the deal. Because virtually all the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program will automatically expire in about a decade.

Now, a decade may seem like a long time in political life, but it’s the blink of an eye in the life of a nation. It’s a blink of an eye in the life of our children. We all have a responsibility to consider what will happen when Iran’s nuclear capabilities are virtually unrestricted and all the sanctions will have been lifted. Iran would then be free to build a huge nuclear capacity that could product many, many nuclear bombs.

Iran’s Supreme Leader says that openly. He says, Iran plans to have 190,000 centrifuges, not 6,000 or even the 19,000 that Iran has today, but 10 times that amount — 190,000 centrifuges enriching uranium. With this massive capacity, Iran could make the fuel for an entire nuclear arsenal and this in a matter of weeks, once it makes that decision.

My long-time friend, John Kerry, Secretary of State, confirmed last week that Iran could legitimately possess that massive centrifuge capacity when the deal expires.

Now I want you to think about that. The foremost sponsor of global terrorism could be weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for an entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and this with full international legitimacy.

And by the way, if Iran’s Intercontinental Ballistic Missile program is not part of the deal, and so far, Iran refuses to even put it on the negotiating table. Well, Iran could have the means to deliver that nuclear arsenal to the far-reach corners of the earth, including to every part of the United States.

So you see, my friends, this deal has two major concessions: one, leaving Iran with a vast nuclear program and two, lifting the restrictions on that program in about a decade. That’s why this deal is so bad. It doesn’t block Iran’s path to the bomb; it paves Iran’s path to the bomb.

So why would anyone make this deal? Because they hope that Iran will change for the better in the coming years, or they believe that the alternative to this deal is worse?

Well, I disagree. I don’t believe that Iran’s radical regime will change for the better after this deal. This regime has been in power for 36 years, and its voracious appetite for aggression grows with each passing year. This deal would wet appetite — would only wet Iran’s appetite for more.

Would Iran be less aggressive when sanctions are removed and its economy is stronger? If Iran is gobbling up four countries right now while it’s under sanctions, how many more countries will Iran devour when sanctions are lifted? Would Iran fund less terrorism when it has mountains of cash with which to fund more terrorism?

Why should Iran’s radical regime change for the better when it can enjoy the best of both world’s: aggression abroad, prosperity at home?

This is a question that everyone asks in our region. Israel’s neighbors — Iran’s neighbors know that Iran will become even more aggressive and sponsor even more terrorism when its economy is unshackled and it’s been given a clear path to the bomb.

And many of these neighbors say they’ll respond by racing to get nuclear weapons of their own. So this deal won’t change Iran for the better; it will only change the Middle East for the worse. A deal that’s supposed to prevent nuclear proliferation would instead spark a nuclear arms race in the most dangerous part of the planet.

This deal won’t be a farewell to arms. It would be a farewell to arms control. And the Middle East would soon be crisscrossed by nuclear tripwires. A region where small skirmishes can trigger big wars would turn into a nuclear tinderbox.

If anyone thinks — if anyone thinks this deal kicks the can down the road, think again. When we get down that road, we’ll face a much more dangerous Iran, a Middle East littered with nuclear bombs and a countdown to a potential nuclear nightmare.

Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve come here today to tell you we don’t have to bet the security of the world on the hope that Iran will change for the better. We don’t have to gamble with our future and with our children’s future.

We can insist that restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program not be lifted for as long as Iran continues its aggression in the region and in the world.

(APPLAUSE)

Before lifting those restrictions, the world should demand that Iran do three things. First, stop its aggression against its neighbors in the Middle East. Second…

(APPLAUSE)

Second, stop supporting terrorism around the world.

(APPLAUSE)

And third, stop threatening to annihilate my country, Israel, the one and only Jewish state.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you.

If the world powers are not prepared to insist that Iran change its behavior before a deal is signed, at the very least they should insist that Iran change its behavior before a deal expires.

(APPLAUSE)

If Iran changes its behavior, the restrictions would be lifted. If Iran doesn’t change its behavior, the restrictions should not be lifted.

(APPLAUSE)

If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country, let it act like a normal country.

(APPLAUSE)

My friends, what about the argument that there’s no alternative to this deal, that Iran’s nuclear know-how cannot be erased, that its nuclear program is so advanced that the best we can do is delay the inevitable, which is essentially what the proposed deal seeks to do?

Well, nuclear know-how without nuclear infrastructure doesn’t get you very much. A racecar driver without a car can’t drive. A pilot without a plan can’t fly. Without thousands of centrifuges, tons of enriched uranium or heavy water facilities, Iran can’t make nuclear weapons.

(APPLAUSE)

Iran’s nuclear program can be rolled back well-beyond the current proposal by insisting on a better deal and keeping up the pressure on a very vulnerable regime, especially given the recent collapse in the price of oil.

(APPLAUSE)

Now, if Iran threatens to walk away from the table — and this often happens in a Persian bazaar — call their bluff. They’ll be back, because they need the deal a lot more than you do.

(APPLAUSE)

And by maintaining the pressure on Iran and on those who do business with Iran, you have the power to make them need it even more.

My friends, for over a year, we’ve been told that no deal is better than a bad deal. Well, this is a bad deal. It’s a very bad deal. We’re better off without it.

(APPLAUSE)

Now we’re being told that the only alternative to this bad deal is war. That’s just not true.

The alternative to this bad deal is a much better deal.

(APPLAUSE)

A better deal that doesn’t leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and such a short break-out time. A better deal that keeps the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in place until Iran’s aggression ends.

(APPLAUSE)

A better deal that won’t give Iran an easy path to the bomb. A better deal that Israel and its neighbors may not like, but with which we could live, literally. And no country…

(APPLAUSE)

… no country has a greater stake — no country has a greater stake than Israel in a good deal that peacefully removes this threat.

Ladies and gentlemen, history has placed us at a fateful crossroads. We must now choose between two paths. One path leads to a bad deal that will at best curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions for a while, but it will inexorably lead to a nuclear-armed Iran whose unbridled aggression will inevitably lead to war.

The second path, however difficult, could lead to a much better deal, that would prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, a nuclearized Middle East and the horrific consequences of both to all of humanity.

You don’t have to read Robert Frost to know. You have to live life to know that the difficult path is usually the one less traveled, but it will make all the difference for the future of my country, the security of the Middle East and the peace of the world, the peace, we all desire.

(APPLAUSE)

My friend, standing up to Iran is not easy. Standing up to dark and murderous regimes never is. With us today is Holocaust survivor and Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel.

(APPLAUSE)

Elie, your life and work inspires to give meaning to the words, “never again.”

(APPLAUSE)

And I wish I could promise you, Elie, that the lessons of history have been learned. I can only urge the leaders of the world not to repeat the mistakes of the past.

(APPLAUSE)

Not to sacrifice the future for the present; not to ignore aggression in the hopes of gaining an illusory peace.

But I can guarantee you this, the days when the Jewish people remained passive in the face of genocidal enemies, those days are over.

(APPLAUSE)

We are no longer scattered among the nations, powerless to defend ourselves. We restored our sovereignty in our ancient home. And the soldiers who defend our home have boundless courage. For the first time in 100 generations, we, the Jewish people, can defend ourselves.

(APPLAUSE)

This is why — this is why, as a prime minister of Israel, I can promise you one more thing: Even if Israel has to stand alone, Israel will stand.

(APPLAUSE)

But I know that Israel does not stand alone. I know that America stands with Israel.

(APPLAUSE)

I know that you stand with Israel.

(APPLAUSE)

You stand with Israel, because you know that the story of Israel is not only the story of the Jewish people but of the human spirit that refuses again and again to succumb to history’s horrors.

(APPLAUSE)

Facing me right up there in the gallery, overlooking all of us in this (inaudible) chamber is the image of Moses. Moses led our people from slavery to the gates of the Promised Land.

And before the people of Israel entered the land of Israel, Moses gave us a message that has steeled our resolve for thousands of years. I leave you with his message today, (SPEAKING IN HEBREW), “Be strong and resolute, neither fear nor dread them.”

My friends, may Israel and America always stand together, strong and resolute. May we neither fear nor dread the challenges ahead. May we face the future with confidence, strength and hope.

May God bless the state of Israel and may God bless the United States of America.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you all.

You’re wonderful.

Thank you, America. Thank you.

Thank you.

END OF TRANSCRIPT.

“The Great Satan” is certainly an accurate description of Jewry, that’s for sure!

After reading that, if you can’t work out that Israel, i.e. Jews, control the US, then you are of very small intellect. Furthermore, if you acknowledge the first part that Jews control the US, but you can’t see that they control 95% of the rest of the world, barring a few Islamic enemies, then you are even dumber!

The thing the Jews have against Iran, who are threatening nobody at all, is that they want complete control over them too. Basically, the point of Bibi’s little trip to the US Congress is to tie up that loose end. They’ll deal with ISIS later, when they’ve outlived their usefulness destabilizing Syria (Assad being another Jewish enemy, coincidentally, of course), which is why Israel/Jewry were never worried about ISIS in the first place!

Israel have a ton of nukes, are known for slaughtering Palestinian children, along with endless aggression against anyone they say is their enemy, but, oh no, it’s never them held to account for their actions. If the UN (read Jew-N) passes some pathetic resolution against Izzy, they just ignore it because they know they already control the US and the so-called “International Community”, who would never seriously hold Israel to account.

Holohoax stuff & Osama Bin-Laden? If you don’t know about this stuff, well, I’m not going to spoon-feed it today. Do your own research. It’s all here somewhere on this site anyway.

It's now time to wake up to the Eternal Parasite and give him the boot!

It’s now time to wake up to the Eternal Parasite and give him the boot!

– BDL1983

The Jewish Vampire Will Fall #2!

Top Italian Philosopher and Former Euro Parliament Member: “Shoot Those Bastard Zionists”

Daily Stormer
July 28, 2014

Gianni Vattimo

Gianni Vattimo

Though I do hate the “Nazi” comparisons, the rising Antisemitism all over the world continues to give me limitless joy.

The Local:

A top Italian philosopher has sparked outrage in Israel and at home after saying that he would like to “shoot those bastard Zionists” and that Israel was “a bit worse than the Nazis”.

As violence escalates in Gaza, Gianni Vattimo also called on Europeans to club together to buy Hamas, the Palestinian militant Islamist organization, “better weapons”.

The former member of the European Parliament made the remarks on Italy’s Radio 24 but they were soon picked up by Israeli media, including Haaretz and i24 News.

In response to whether he would like to see more Israelis killed Vattimo, who co-edited a booked called Deconstructing Zionism. A Critique of Political Metaphysics, replied: “Of course! But unfortunately, I can’t really shoot”, due to being exempt from military service.

He also said Europeans should get together to fight along with Hamas, akin to the foreign volunteers who fought dictator Francisco Franco Bahamonde during the Spanish Civil War.

His comments sparked condemnation in Italy, with Renzo Gattegna, the leader of Italy’s Union of Jewish communities, saying in a statement that Vattimo’s words were “unacceptable” and “a mixture of the most heinous allegations” against Israel.

What happens is that the more public figures come out and say this stuff, the easier it becomes for others to do so.

What you are witnessing is the Jews losing their grip.

Source Article

The Jewish vampires cannot stop being vampires and we can expect more and more public figures to condemn them in the future. Every act of condemnation is bound to wake more people up and help them see the Jew for the devil that he is. We are indeed witnessing the Jews losing their grip. Their parasitic system is self-destructing under it’s own weight of endless internal contradictions. The Jew system represents what he thinks is his mastery over Nature. Nature will prove him wrong, and this is exactly what we are seeing in its early stages.

Our ideals represent Natural Law and things have a natural tendency to correct themselves. We must continue to highlight what evil bastards they are to help speed up the process! 

– BDL1983

Rat-faced Jews evict African Asylum Seekers camped near Egyptian border

This is how Jews deal with Africans seeking Asylum in Israel. Where's their wonderful Jewish virtue of "tolerance"?

This is how Jews deal with Africans seeking Asylum in Israel. Where’s their wonderful Jewish virtue of “tolerance”?

From Haaretz:

Police on Sunday evening forcefully evacuated hundreds of African asylum seekers encamped near the Egyptian border. They had walked out of the Holot detention center on Friday in protest against Israel’s policy of detaining them indefinitely.

Some 100 Border Police arrived at the makeshift camp that the asylum seekers erected in Nitzana Forest. After giving them half an hour to agree to leave, the officers began evacuating them by force, and clashes broke out between the two sides.

“Our aim is to get you on the buses in an orderly fashion, without the use of force and without involving the immigration authority,” the police representative told the asylum-seekers, who chanted back, “We don’t want to!” and “freedom!”

Earlier in the day, protesters said they feared they would be arrested and brought back to the Holot facility in the western Negev.  The Population and Immigration Authority had said it “would act according to its authority granted by law.”

Read More

Human Rights? Tolerance? Multiculturalism? We can all just get along?…..

No?

Of course not! Not in Israel!

They want their international criminal parasite state, falsely called Israel, for Jews only, whilst everyone else has to be tolerant, loving, and accepting of all invaders from any race entering into their countries. Double standards anyone?

These filthy Jews have created so many problems around the world it would be impossible for us to repay them with what they truly deserve! However, in the meantime, anyone on facebook might like to support this page to help make life more difficult for the stinking Israeli Kikes! Let’s give ’em a dose of their own medicine!! Fuck ’em!!

Please help the poor starving African Immigrants enter Israel. This is a matter of urgency and Human Rights!

Please help the poor starving African Immigrants enter Israel. This is a matter of Human Rights!

As for the 3 dead Israeli rats, who gives a fuck about them? The Jews probably staged the whole thing anyway so they could do this.

We know what the Jews are up to. It couldn’t be any more obvious. The truth is getting more and more acceptable to more and more common people as they see the blatant hypocrisy of these rat bastards! 

Finally, where’s the outright condemnation and horror at the Jewish treatment of African Asylum seekers from all the fucking whining do-gooder arseholes? Human Rights? Tolerance? Why don’t they make some serious noise about these Jews, or are they too busy trying not to be “anti-semitic?”

– BDL1983

All You Need to Know about Nigel Farage

Nigel Farage - I don't know about this character.

Nigel Farage

I’ve had enough of this UKIP character, Nigel Farage. He clearly loves the Jews as is evidenced in this article:

……So what are Farage’s views on the Jewish community? The Jewish Chronicle recently hosted a meeting with him. The meeting was packed, because Farage and UKIP, unlike other minority political parties in the UK (such as the Greens), are enthusiastic supporters of Israel – unequivocally so. The party even has a caucus called “the UKIP Friends of Israel.” Asked by Jewish Chronicle Editor Stephen Pollard about his stance on current Jewish concerns such as attacks on shechita, Farage explained that a UKIP politician recently investigated a kosher slaughterhouse in London’s East End and reported that Jewish ritual slaughter methods are actually more humane than those in the abbatoirs for the general population.

Another of the UKIP’s preoccupations is immigration. Farage, who asserts that prior to Tony Blair becoming Prime Minister, no more than 30,000 immigrants came to the UK annually, explains that the UK is now forced to accept a totally unsupportable minimum of 500,000 immigrants a year due to EU regulations. Next year, Romanians and Bulgarians will be allowed to enter the UK more or less freely – countries whose standard of living is substantially lower than that of the UK, with all that this implies.

Naturally, in an audience of Jews, many of whom are descendants of refugees, Farage was asked whether this meant he was against refugees. “Not at all”, he replied, “I myself am a descendant of refugees, French Huguenots who came here to avoid being burned at the stake!”  But there is a difference, he asserts, between genuine refugees fleeing persecution and people who emigrate to sponge off the state and work for below minimum wage.

UKIP’s anti-European, free trade platform is seriously frightening the incumbent Conservative government. They and the British press, which is overwhelmingly owned by Conservative proprietors, have done all they can to smear the UKIP and paint the party as a bunch of crazies. But Farage is a very convincing politician, and the Jewish vote might help propel a UKIP candidate to the mayoralty of London in 2016. Before that, there are the European elections and the local elections in 2014. If the UKIP does well, Prime Minister David Cameron has much to fear in the next General Election.

He is so obviously a Jew-arse kisser it’s sickening! Check this article out:

nigel-farage-ukip-loves-israel

Nuff said.

In case anyone is wondering, I don’t love or worship Vladimir Putin. Far from it in fact! I posted the previous post simply because what he said was interesting. Nothing more, nothing less. Figure it out for yourselves….

– BDL1983

A Conversation About Endless Internet Activity & Nothing Ever Really Happening in the Real World

It must end..... but how do we end it?

It must end….. but how do we end it?

I recently just took a week and a half off of blogging. I needed a bit of a break from constant internet ‘surfing’ and going through all the news etc. Sometimes you just get sick to fucking death of it all – the same old scenario of fucked up new stories everyday. It gets very repetitive (as you probably are fully aware!) spending most of your time analysing what the Jews have been up to.

We already know what the agenda is: Jews want to rule the entire world from their home bases of New York, London, Tel-Aviv, and Hollywood. They get to maintain their international swindling HQ over there in Edomite land (a land for Edomite Jews only; falsely called Israel), and the rest of the world will live in a big Commie pig-pen where everyone is nothing more than a bunch of mixed-race, culture-free, consuming, mindless idiots. That’s the promise from these wonderful enlightening rat-faced Edomite Jew bastards! We also know that Racial Nationalism/National Socialism are the only known antidotes to the Jewish problem. Right. So what do we do about this in the real world? Is there any point in me doing all this internet-based activism? Sometimes I really don’t know….

One of the engine rooms driving the Yids toward the goal of world domination

One of the engine rooms driving the Yids toward the goal of world domination

Anyway, I was having this particular conversation on Skype with John Hardon and Cairo last weekend and it seems I’m not the only one who’s fast growing sick and tired of our real-world political impotence. The general feeling that all three of us agreed on is described by John quite well in this post (although I wouldn’t say that the Daily Stormer is good for the Jews, but I think you get the gist of what John is saying there). Basically our general feeling is that the Jews will let us have these blogs/internet sites because it is a good avenue for us to ‘let off steam’ and continue to do nothing in the real world. We just happily sit here blogging and preaching to the already converted, in general. I know this is true because over time blogs get more and more popular as traffic increases due to more search engine hits. The traffic from other sites ‘in-the-know’ hasn’t really increased that much over time and this is because it’s the same people doing their daily rounds of the ‘anti-Semite’ sites. I know, I do the same thing myself!

So, yeah, John Hardon has taken a bit of time away from blogging lately and I don’t blame him. He’s not stopping it all-together and neither am I. Although I might streamline this site a bit and post less often to avoid a serious case of ‘bloggiosis’ (blog fatigue). I’ll probably be writing more of my own stuff and not bothering with as many reposts from other sites, maybe. We’ll see. I think that’s the direction I’ll head in anyway. Who knows – I’ll probably change my mind as the Jew news pisses me off again and I have to vent!………

Whatever, it’s just a few thoughts on things of late.

BDL1983

This Is Just So Upsetting

From The Australian:

All our hearts are bleeding....

All our hearts are bleeding for this wonderful Edomite Jew……

FORMER Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon died at a hospital near Tel Aviv last night, aged 85, after spending eight years in a coma.

Confirmation of the death came early today. “The Sheba medical centre in Tel HaShomer announces with sorrow the passing of former prime minister Ariel Sharon that was determined approximately an hour ago,” Professor Shlomo Noy told a news conference.

Despite multiple efforts to halt stabilise him, he passed away yesterday afternoon at about 1200 GMT (11PM AEDT), the hospital said.

“He’s gone; he went when he decided to go,” his son Gilad told reporters at the hospital, in remarks carried by Channel 2 television.

The health of Mr Sharon had worsened in preceding days, with hospital officials describing him as being in “extremely critical” condition.

“Over the past hours, there has been a worsening of the condition of former prime minister Ariel Sharon. His condition is described as extremely critical and his family is at his side all the time,” said a statement from Sheba hospital on Thursday.

Mr Sharon has been in a coma since January 4, 2006 after suffering a massive stroke, but his condition took a sudden turn for the worse on January 1 when he suffered serious kidney problems after surgery.

The long-time leader of the right-wing nationalist camp in Israeli politics, Mr Sharon had a stroke on January 4, 2006, slipping into a coma from which he has never recovered.

Following an extraordinary and controversial career stretching back more than half a century, Mr Sharon became convinced Israel needed to separate from the Palestinians and unilaterally determine its own borders.

Read More

An Israeli Right-Wing NATIONALIST; what a hero! If he were any other non-Jewish “Right-Wing Nationalist” they’d be spitting venom at the guy…. Oh well, at least with Jews there are never any double standards!! Hahahaha!!!!

– BDL1983

The Power of the Word ‘Racism’

From Noble1Blog:

words-as-weapons2

The word racism is used as a mind weapon against White people who speak about immigration, racial differences, or persevering their own people. A White person who stands up in protection of their own human rights will be slandered as being a hateful racist.
It has also become a word to falsely project an inner hatred that whites are inflicting on non-white populations. It is a word used to explain why another race in a European homeland may not be prospering like the host population, or why blacks are poor and live in ghettos committing crimes. By understanding the broad spectrum this word is used for truly shows its power and the correct label as a weapon. Originally the word ‘Racist’ meant someone who understood racial differences; no longer so. These words have been carefully created and the connotations they carry have been planned in accordance with the Jewish agenda. The word racism and its connotations, images and emotions it carries was not brought about naturally, but a deliberate deceptive orchestration to be used as a weapon in conjunction with the Jewish plan of replacing the population of European countries with 3rd world immigrants.

Words created to support the Jewish agenda

White Supremacism White supremacism is used against a white person who stands up for the human rights and preservation of his own people.

Connotations: This word carries connotations such as belittling non-white races and the person being superior over other races.

Anti-Semitism – This word is used against anyone that has something to say about Jews or Israel , i.e Someone questions whether Israel has the right to nuclear weapons.

Connotations: The Holocaust (Holohoax), an irrational hatred of Jews for no other reason than being Jewish.

Homophobic – This word is used to slander, insult anyone who has an opinion on a homosexuality issue. A person that supports the traditional ideal of marriage between a man and a women.

Connotations: Someone who hates homosexuals for the fact they have a different sexual orientation. Carries certain connotations such as: religious, old fashioned, hateful.

Nazi: This word is used as a slander against any White person in the world that stands up for his or her rights as a White person.

Connotations: Slanders the person & casts them in a negative light. Brings thoughts such as the negative Hollywood representation of National Socialist Germany, the so-called Holocaust, false negative representations of Adolf Hitler, movies like Schindler’s list.

These words would not be as powerful and effective against anyone who opposes this cancer sweeping the western world if not for the constant use and illusionary creation of evil associations within them, orchestrated by various elements such as the media, educational system.

Words are a very powerful part of Jewish psychological warfare against Whites. Certain words set off emotional triggers in your brain which bring in images and thoughts associated with the word. By creating the words and using them over and over, along with the images in the media, they have successfully created weapons out of certain words. Jews using their massive influence in the media have set the tone for discussion. What’s OK to talk about and what is not. That’s why we have political correctness which the jews have created in line with their agenda.

‘Political Correctness = KOSHER APPROVED’

Source Article

Political Correctness also equals “Cultural Marxism”. If you don’t agree with the Jews and their Communist agenda, then the mass-media says that your ideas must be shunned….

PUKE!

– BDL1983

Who Controls Your Mind?

Daily Stormer
December 26, 2013

Below is a chart showing who controls the media.

It is even more ridiculous than you would have expected.

Who-Controls-Your-Mind

Click to enlarge.

Show this to anyone who dares suppose that “Jews don’t control the media”.  Because it is an objective fact that they do.

Source Article

Rupert Murdoch is Jewish too by the way!

– BDL1983

What Famous Men Have Said About Jews

No-one likes the Jew. It’s not surprising once you understand his actions, both in the past and the present day. He has always been a vampire attaching himself to his unfortunate host nation. If you rape, rob, kill, and generally destroy everything you touch, it shouldn’t be a surprise to find out that you are universally hated! If Jews didn’t do all the evil things they like doing then no-one would have a problem with them. It’s that simple.

– BDL1983

Jews concerned about Free Speech on the Internet

adl_comic

Surprise, surprise!!

In this article found on J-Wire, a Sydney-based Jew named David Singer, presents the Jewish community’s ‘concern‘ over people’s ability to express themselves freely on the internet. Freedom to say whatever you want, must be limited, because 5 poor innocent loving Jews were beaten up last week in Bondi. How dare anyone say anything that paints the Jewish community is a less-than-favourable light? Why, that is called ‘Hate‘, and according to the Jews we shouldn’t be allowed to express hatred. To tell the truth about this charming group is simply labelled ‘Hate’.

Just a little reminder to any Jews reading this: Article 19 of the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Just as a side-note: I am aware that all documentation and spoken word from any U.N. body referring to ‘human rights’, is actually referring only to Jews as humans, since according to the Talmud, we (the non-Jews) are beasts:

“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”
Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

Let’s see what the Jews are whining about:

The Internet has become one of the major contributors to the growing spread of Jew-hatred and assaults on Jews world wide.

The senseless attack by a group of hooligans in Bondi, Sydney last week bashing five Jewish people – one a 62 years old woman – as they were walking home after enjoying a Sabbath meal with friends – has resulted in an outpouring of world-wide condemnation by politicians, the media, the public and other religious groups.

Yet it is only one of an increasing number of such similar assaults on Jews world-wide.

Jewish communities have for decades been required to place their synagogues, communal schools and organizations under 24 hour security surveillance.

The propensity of the Internet to become an uncontrolled vehicle for racial incitement has been allowed to escape under the radar. It is time that its capacity to so influence the minds of its readers was diminished.

What has become particularly disturbing is the ability of people to make whatever comments they like on the Internet without disclosing their full names and addresses to web editors when submitting their comments.

Newspapers require such details to be supplied – and only in exceptional circumstances will anonymous letters be published.

Why do Internet sites not demand the same standard of compliance?

Failure to do so has seen the publication of anonymous comments such as the following:

“The Jews will still occupy the West Bank and blockade Gaza and continue with their brutal, genocidal occupation. If the world were to be rid of the U.S. and Israel, there would be a chance of peace in our chaotic, conflicted world. Surely, anyone with half a brain can see that! 

Freedom of speech should not mean that people should enjoy freedom from prosecution or legal action for comments they make that defame people or groups of people or incite or are capable of inciting violence.

This would be a clear violation of Article 19, if the term ‘human rights‘ included the Goyim. It doesn’t, and it is only speaking of Jews as ‘human’. Back to the whining article:

Should the following comment have been allowed to be anonymously posted?

“Racist Israel is more than an abomination in the Middle East, it is a threat to the 7bn people it considers not to be racially “special”. Us.  All the more reason to stop keeping it alive, and to target it with overwhelming nuclear might if it retaliates against civilisation for refusing to back its play. The Zionists may be blinded by their belief that God will protect them. Nobody and nothing will.”

No doubt apologists will argue that objections can be lodged to delete offending comments – but its implementation inevitably leads to strident cries claiming censorship.

Securing the deletion of an objectionable comment also ignores the damage caused during the time that such comment has remained online before its removal.

These vile viewpoints – if authoritatively sourced – should be exposed to public gaze so that readers can understand the level and intensity of the hatred that exists – as exemplified in the following comment:

“Why should we [love Jews] given what they do to the Palestinians and have done since 1948? I don’t think that Jews are capable of love. Their religion gets in the road. Their god is loveless and punitive and so are they!”

Jews are not on their own in being singled out for such incessant abuse and vilification on the Internet………..

Read More

As you can see, the criticism of Jews and Israel (expressed in the example comments) is very tame, and essentially truthful. That’s what they’re worried about of course! They just keep on whining about it.

Here’s another related post from Destroy Zionism:

According to an article by the New York Post, the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC), an anti-European Jewish organization, has found that more and more people criticize international Jewry online.

“There’s everything from mocking the legacy of Anne Frank [who died of typhus but has been expoited as a ‘Holocaust victim’ by Jews ever since], to getting young people to try to join in with a racist, extreme far-right [sic] group in the United States,” says Rabbi Abraham Cooper at the SWC.

Twitter generally avoids political censorship. Recently however, a Jewish student organization in France pressured Twitter into releasing personal details of thought criminals in France.

Read More

antijuden

– BDL1983