(This video and the last couple of posts are re-posts from White Racial Identity by the way…..)
(This video and the last couple of posts are re-posts from White Racial Identity by the way…..)
Last Friday night I did a pre-recorded show with Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. We discussed a variety of topics, including a few of the latest posts/articles from this site.
For those not familiar with Andy’s work, I’d suggest getting these two books:
I’m going to explain a few things here in relatively simple terms, so anyone who is confused or wondering what motivates me can refer to this article.
What Sort Of Society Do I Want To Live In?
I want to live in a society among my own kind, meaning my own race. I do not want to live among those of other races because they are not of my blood and do not share a common world view and basic morality with my race – the White Aryan race. Different breeds (races) of humans are different, and for that reason alone it should make sense to anyone with a thinking brain to keep them separate. Now, despite the fact that there are plenty of arsehole Whites around the place, I’d still a million times over prefer to live with them than non-whites. As for all the Whites who’s natural sense of morality has been led astray, well they need to be re-educated to adhere to proper Christian principles.
Essentially I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality, similar to what we saw in National Socialist Germany. There’s nothing devious or tricky about any of this. It is what it is.
Am I an “Extremist”?
It is not “extreme” to want to live in a White nation with Christian morality. It is a perfectly rational desire for any White person who wants their race and themselves to have a decent future. What is extreme though, is this Jewish agenda to try and force all the non-whites and their foreign belief systems into any White living space, anywhere on earth! That is fucking nuts, pardon my French! So, no, I am not an “extremist” by any stretch. If you want “extremism”, then look no further than the current day Jewish-run political establishment in the west!
Why Won’t I accept Jews, Moslems, Blacks And Other Assorted Mixed-Breeds?
Pretty simple folks – the answer here is that these people (non-whites in general) are trouble makers. People don’t like to hear it, but it’s true and it needs to be said. Follow the historical path of civilization and observe the pattern: White Aryans create the civilization and it flourishes. Then the Jews worm their way in and corrupt everything. Next, they start bringing in other non-whites as slave labour. Finally, we are left with a racially mixed decaying civilization. Hitler explains this in Mein Kampf and it’s true, whether fashionable to say so or not! (it will be fashionable a few years down the track, trust me!) So when I am presented with the options of a White racially pure society or a racially mixed, Jew and negro loving society, which one do you think I’d choose?
Do I Have An Irrational Hatred Of Non-Whites?
Absolutely not. I have never been that sort of person. What I do have though, is a perfectly rational hatred for a lot of these people, not because I’m some sort of horrible monster, but because their actions warrant it! They have throughout history caused the downfall of my race’s civilizations, yet I’m supposed to love them all and welcome them in with open arms? People always talk about “learning from history” and if they were serious about it they’d pay attention to my reasoning above.
I Just Can’t Be Bothered With All The Bullshit That Comes Along With A Multicultural (Multiracial) Society
Racial Nationalism is natural. A race or breed should have it’s own territory. You respect the boundaries of your lands, and others should do the same with theirs. If not, you crush the wrong-doer. It’s that simple (in theory anyway).
Multicultural (multiracial) societies run by Jews always turn into Marxist cesspits of competing ethnic groups. This is no good because what it means is the most productive group (Whites) must carry all the useless groups (mostly non-Whites) via taxation and the welfare system until we can’t support it any longer and the society crumbles. Why would I want that?
Anyway, I don’t have any particular feelings of ill-will toward the other races. They can go and do whatever they feel like in their own lands, but not in mine! I just don’t want to live with them or have anything to do with them! Why is that so hard for people to understand?
Feelings About Fags
Faggotry is outside the boundaries of any healthy White Christian society. I do not want their disgusting degeneracy to have any place in my society. I do not uphold the Jewish idea of “freedom” which means anyone anywhere can just do whatever they want, including the dick up bum hole act. This sort of degeneracy all fuels the fire which destroys White society, and that is why I oppose it! A society must have standards if it is to survive!
More About Feelings
I just don’t care about the plight of non-whites. Be they Jews, Arabs, Negroes, Asiatics, or some other exotic mixture, I just don’t care. Never have, never will. I always think “well why would you involve yourself in someone else’s problems?” No, that’s for them in Arab-land or negro-land to figure out. It’s not my business, I don’t care, so they can go cry to someone else about their “oppression”. I won’t bother them if they don’t bother me. It’s pretty simple.
Just to reinforce the point:
I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality. The best example we have is what we saw in National Socialist Germany:
None of this stuff is hard to understand, nor is it overly complex.
Do People Even Have Worldviews?
The other day I was busy thinking about the worldviews people have, and whether what most people consider their own opinions even constitute worldviews? After careful consideration I decided that even the weak minded TV brainwashed types do have worldviews, it’s just that they don’t have any solid foundations for them. The Jew has worked his poison of moral relativism and the idea that because things in the world are ‘ever changing’, then your worldview should always be adjusting itself according to the changes. If something was deemed morally wrong in the past, the Jew says that this was just the fashion at the time and that it isn’t necessarily wrong now (sodomites are a great example). In using that sort of technique the Jews and their Marxist minions have continually chipped away at the now ‘thin wall’ of basic morality and solid principles which once upheld western civilization.
The Two Contrasting Types Of Worldview:
1.) The Rock Solid Worldview – The person with strong convictions is always going to lay down strong principles which will be the foundation of their worldview. Being one of these sorts of people, I know that my principles, which govern exactly how I think, cannot be bent. They do not change. And when your principles are correct it makes it impossible for anyone with a decent amount of common sense to argue with you.
2.) The Moral Relativist Worldview – Like I mentioned above, people with this sort of worldview shift and morph their views according to what suits the current moment in time. The vast majority of people fit into this category today because we are almost completely void of the solid Christian worldview (National Socialism is the best expression of it, by the way) which protected us against any variety of Jewish poison. I’ve also heard the moral relativist worldview referred to as the ‘fluid worldview‘, which sounds to me like a way of someone admitting they don’t really know why they think what they do, but nonetheless they do. Then down the track they’ll change their minds in direct correlation with pop culture anyway.
Strong Men Have Strong Worldviews
It’s really no coincidence, but you wont find many weak-looking faggy males who are attracted to a strong message and strong principles. They are always repelled by strength of any sort and seek to hide behind the pathetic protection of the Jew and his moral relativist creed. Try having a conversation with one of these sorts if you want to learn first-hand how pathetic and shitty their ‘arguments’ truly are!
My Conversation With The Lefty Faggot At The Pub
After the last Reclaim Australia rally I ended up talking to this flabby weak looking male and a bunch of other lefties at a pub in town, just for the hell of it really. He knew what I was about and I knew what he was about, so I talked to this effeminate fag for about an hour. We discussed why I thought what I did and vice versa, and every time I showed him why his opinions were at best very naive and mostly completely stupid. I told him that Hitler was right and that the Jews were the cause of our problems and explained my case logically, but to no avail of course! He ended up getting offended by my swastika ring and despite a relatively peaceful discussion (the “agree to disagree” type because the idiot wouldn’t change his mind), he refused to even shake my hand because of the ring! What pathetic cowardly conduct! I was prepared to shake his hand even though he’d just been preaching communism to me for an hour, mainly because at least he agreed to have a conversation. Our enemies are all pathetic cowards anyway; that’s my point.
Strong men should have no problem putting their worldview out there for others to examine. That’s what I’ve always done and always will!
William Finck has posted his program notes with pertinent links at the Christogenea Forum under the same title, found here: Rejecting Rainbow Nationalism.
Mike Delaney of Prothink.org and Trutube.tv and Brett Light of ExpeltheParasite.com and White Racial Identity.net join William Finck for a discussion on Rainbow Nationalism, and why White Nationalists, and especially Christian Nationalists, must reject these failures and victims of the Jewish agenda and Jewish Pop Culture.
The show went well and we did our best to make things interesting! I enjoyed doing the show and I hope you enjoy listening!
The subject of evolution is one that needs addressing because far too many people, including many supposedly ‘awakened’ people, believe in it. They believe in it because it is dressed up as science and it is taught in schools and universities as fact. Add to that, the endless David Attenborough documentaries on the television, and there you go. That’s why most people, including a large percentage of ‘White Nationalists’, believe in this Jewish lie of ‘evolution’. In reality, evolutionary theory is a trick played upon people’s minds and imaginations. It is indeed a deception, and one that I used to believe in. Therefore, I understand the thought process from the point of view of a believer. Now I’m going to pick it to shreds!
My other website featuring my latest article.
It has been asked what supporting evidence there is for the Christian Identity teaching, that White Europeans are the tribes of Israel. It has been suggested that it may have just been a convenient idea to serve the empirical ambitions of Britain. Anyone that thinks this cannot have properly investigated it, as the supporting evidence is all around us. Besides the actual wording of the scriptures themselves, which are obviously racially exclusive and quite definitive about Christ only coming for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, there are also many secular proofs to corroborate it.
Wherever the Hebrews went they left witnesses to show that they had been there, in the form of megalithic structures. Some were erected in memory of a vow or a battle and others were intended as way marks, to confirm to those following that they were going in the right direction to meet with more. There are many verses in the Bible referring to these stone structures, some of them were just piles of rocks, others were standing stones arranged in circles or rows and others were tombs, which took the form of the long barrows that are dotted all around Britain. A long barrow once the earth has been removed from it is called a cromlech or a dolmen and these are found as far afield as Japan, showing that our White ancestors once trekked all the way to the Orient. One particular long barrow that gets mentioned quite frequently in the Bible, is the one that was built in a field for Abraham.
The megaliths that are found around Britain also conform to the instruction given in the Bible for the building of Solomon’s temple, that no iron tools should be used in the making of them. Although many of the structures were built well into the iron age, they have clearly had no metal tools used in shaping them. There have also never been any idols found anywhere in Britain that were not Roman, unlike the many idols that are regularly dug up around the ancient cities of the Middle East. Again, the Bible stipulates that no idols should be made or worshipped by the Israelites.
Besides the witnesses to our heritage that any Briton can find for themselves on an OS map, there are also the royal family trees of Europe, which can be worked back through Brutus, Aeneas or Cecrops through to Zarah, the son of Judah. All the heraldry of Europe can be traced to an origin in the various ensigns that were given by Jacob Israel to his twelve sons on his death bed. The twelve tribes are described as pitching camp in the shape of a swastika made up of three tribes on each side, with their flags flying and the tabernacle and Levites in the middle. Perhaps the most striking example of the heraldic links is with the flag of Ulster, which is a red hand on a hexagram, the hexagram symbolising the six counties in the kingdom and the red hand symbolising the red cord that was tied around Zarah’s hand when he put it out of the womb first, although it was his twin Pharez that eventually arrived first. Obviously the legend of Zarah has evolved over time as all myths do, but even the later ones still point back to the original, with the most popular myth claiming that a warrior chief cut his hand off and threw it to the finishing line in a race, to ensure that he won.
Along with the proofs in Europe, there are proofs in the Middle East too. In Persia there is a giant rock inscription commemorating the conquests of Darius, carved into the face of a mountain around 515BC. It was inscribed in three different languages, old Persian, Akkadian and Elamite and talks about the conquered tribes that were vassals to him. One of these tribes were the Sakka (Isaaca), who later became known as the Scythians. In the Akkadian version of the inscription the word is ‘Gimiri’, which is where we get the words Cimmerian and Cymru from. So the Scythians and the Cimmerians were originally one and the same people. The word ‘Gimiri’ can be shown to have originated in the name of the Hebrew king ‘Omri’ and the area this conquered tribe is recorded as being in, is the same area the Bible tells us the Israelites were deported to by the Assyrians.
From before that time, we have the letters excavated at Tel-el-Armarna, that were missives written by the Canaanites to the Egyptian king, asking for his help as they were being invaded by a people named as both ‘Habiru’ and ‘Saga’, the same word as ‘Sakka’ on the Behistun rock. The letters clearly show that Sidon and Tyre were conquered by the Hebrews, with one of the writers lamenting the fact that all the cities which the Pharaoh had given him had fallen to the Saga and another stating that the ruler of Sidon had surrendered to them. It was after this conquest that the Hebrew occupiers became known as ‘Phoenicians’ to history and gained their reputation as colonisers, leaving traces of themselves all over Europe, particularly in Britain.
It is often wondered why the Persian King Cyrus allowed the remnant of the tribe of Judah that were held in Babylon to go back to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple at his expense. According to an inscription on the Cylinder of Cyrus, he was a ‘King of Anshan’ which designates him as being an Elamite, descended from Elam who was another son of Shem. The kings of Anshan had been conquered by the Medes at the time the tribe of Judah were taken, but once they were back in control again they naturally helped their brothers in the tribe of Judah to rebuild the temple to their God, the God of Shem.
The eventual infiltration and adulteration of this remnant of Judah by Arab (mixed-race) tribes such as the Edomites, Cuthites and Sephervaim, is dealt with in the Bible and the Apocrypha, along with the works of the historian Flavius Josephus and is confirmed in the modern Jews encyclopaedia.
All the relevant inscriptions that have been unearthed from Nineveh and elsewhere describe the Sakka/Iskuza/Scythians as being in the same place that the Gomri, Khomri, Cymru were, which is the exact place that other records state the ten tribes of the house of Israel were. Rather than having three nations all living in the same territory, it is much more likely that these were all just different names for the same people. Herodotus records the Scythians as abhorring swine, refusing to sacrifice them or even to touch them, which is also inline with the biblical commandments for the Israelites.
The Scythian Israelites moved west through the Israel pass in the Caucasus mountains, leaving grave stones in the Crimea giving dates going back to their original exodus from Egypt. The Irish have records of the prophet Jeremiah arriving with the Hebrew daughter of the last king of Israel, who married into Zarah’s line that were already in Europe. Again, there is a stone to witness this, the Bethel stone that commemorates Jacob’s dream of the ladder with angels ascending and descending, this stone going on to be used at every British coronation since. The Scots talked of when they first left the Egyptian captivity in the declaration of Arbroath and the early church fathers used to refer to Christians as Israel regularly. This tradition continued in Britain right up until a few centuries ago, not because Jews were in the country, but as a trace memory of the British people’s true heritage as the sons of Jacob Israel. In fact the ancient coronation ceremony of England is full of references to the Biblical coronations, right down to the cheer of ‘God save the King’.
The evidence that the White Europeans are the children of Israel is overwhelming and constantly being further reinforced by new archaeological discoveries. The Library at Nineveh was not discovered until the 19th century and the Dead Sea scrolls only uncovered in the 20th, complete with detailed physical descriptions of people like Noah and Abraham’s wife Sarah, as being 100% White. The Jews clearly do not want Europeans discovering this as it strips them of their claim to being a chosen people. But if you think about it logically, they never could have been a chosen people. Only the White Europeans have had all the prophecies come true for them, not the Jews. The knowledge that the Europeans were of Israel must have been known at the time of the early church, or else the Apostles would not have brought Christianity to us in the first place. They were told only to go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, the dispersed nations that grew from the displaced peoples of the Assyrian deportations.
There are many more proofs of the identity of the European people than I have listed, including all the references by our earliest historians, who all wrote that Europe was uninhabited except for the coast and that the original founders of Greece and Rome started out as captives in Egypt. There is also our mythology, which can be shown to have the same origin as our Bible. Our languages are all derived from paleo-Hebrew and our oldest European alphabet is uncannily similar to it. We have so many geographic names that originate in the Bible it is impossible to think that this was not once common knowledge. Names such as Denmark, the Danube, Zaragossa, the Hebrides, we even have places named ‘Zion’ all over Europe that have never once had any Jews living in them! Our druidic priesthood was hereditary just like the Levites’ was and they even dressed the same, as well as offered up the same sin offerings.
It really is the only logical explanation for the zeal with which our ancestors took to Christianity. They knew that it was theirs and they knew that Christ was a White European. The truth of it can be seen wherever you care to look and however you care to think. Our ancestors would never have accepted a foreign religion, as some who would like to denigrate their memory are saying today. The Bible identifies the Israelites as us, the oldest historians do, archaeology does and logic does.
Anyone who ignores all this is just lying to themselves.
Christian Identity is the ultimate truth and I don’t care what people think of me pushing it. I’m going to continue to push the CI message because it’s true. Anyone who doesn’t like it is free to not visit this site. I couldn’t care less.
You don’t get much clearer than that, and Adolf Hitler was certainly no liar!
To all the numb-skulls who think Hitler was a pagan –
The choices are:
1.) Adolf Hitler understood how Christianity worked and that is why he always spoke positively of it and promoted it to his people, or
2.) he was a liar and deceiver who was outwardly dishonest toward his people, whilst secretly harbouring the opposite feelings.
The first option is so obviously the truth that it is mind-boggling how anyone claiming to be a National Socialist could believe the second. Although, I suppose for the willfully blind among us, a few heresay Hitler quotes (Table Talk for example) will always be enough for them to believe that Hitler was an occultist anti-Christ, despite Hitler affirming Christianity in most of his speeches and never saying a word against it!
Hitler was not a contradiction in ideology or action. People that believe the second option are though. Most are too arrogant to ever realise it and are happy being poor judges of character and basically idiots – sorry, but it’s true.
I will be writing something up in the near future about this topic by the way, but I’m not quite sure when.
The great deception of WW2 was to fool all Christians of the allied forces to fight for communism against the Christian armies of Germany and her Christian allies.
The imagery in that video says more than a thousand words.
This radio show with Bill Finck and Sven Longshanks is a very important one to listen to. It nails the Evolution vs Creation argument, along with many other often promoted falsehoods within the “White Nationalist community”.
Show intro (Bill’s opening statement):
We are going to play a tape, actually a YouTube video, of a man who is interviewing several PhDs and science students, and asking them for one observed instance of macro-evolution. While micro-evolution is often used for what may better be called the adaptation of species, macro-evolution is the actual changing of one identifiable kind, such as a cat, into another identifiable kind, such as a dog or a cow. Evolutionists play with the word species, and when it comes to macro-evolution they are challenged by the concept of kind. When they are cornered, as one PhD in the video was cornered, they insist that by adding an unspecified but very long amount of time, macro-evolution somehow happens. But they cannot prove that it has ever actually happened, and it has never been observed to happen. Therefore macro-evolution is a religious belief, and it is at least as fantastic a belief as those of any other religion. One PhD interviewed was forced to admit that evolution in this regard is a “belief”, even though he was very reluctant to do so. Other PhDs were speechless and fumbling when challenged on macro-evolution. Textbooks and journals, which hypothetically extrapolate entire genera from the bones of certain long-dead animals, are merely promoting conjecture which does not at all amount to valid science.
And Hitler can have the final word here:
“My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before in the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice…. And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people…. When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom to-day this poor people is plundered and exploited.”
-Adolf Hitler, in his speech in Munich on 12 April 1922