Category Archives: Communism

Fraser Anning’s Speech To Australia’s House Of Treason

The other day a very surprising thing happened. Someone in parliament actually said something worthwhile – that someone was a little known senator named Fraser Anning. He clearly came with a mission in delivering his maiden speech to parliament. Needless to say, he obviously hit a nerve, since pretty much every other scumbag in the parliament came out to condemn him for his speech. Naturally, all of our mainstream jew media joined in the chorus of outrage and condemnation as well! Good times!

So, rather than just accepting the super trustworthy mainstream media assessment of his speech as vile, racist, and hateful or whatever ‘ism’ you can dream up; I suggest people take the 37 minutes it takes to watch his speech below and make up their own minds.

Independent thought is a virtue, but unfortunately we live in an age where it is extremely scarce.

And here is the transcript for those keen on having a bit of a read through it:

Fraser Anning’s Full Speech:

“Thank you, Mr President. I am pleased to advise that this is finally my first speech. On 6 February 1890, Sir Henry Parkes, the man who was to become the ‘Father of our Federation’, spoke to assembled delegates at the Federation Conference in Melbourne. He said: And, in this country of Australia with such ample space, with such inviting varieties of soil and climate … and with a people occupying that soil unequaled in … nation-creating properties, what is there that should be impossible? … … … … we know the value of their British origin.

We know that we represent a race … for the purposes of settling new colonies, which never had its equal on the face of the earth. The crimson thread of kinship runs through us all. The founding father of our Federation knew that it was not simply a bounteous land that makes a nation, but the common threads of inherited identity that unite its people. And what he was telling delegates and, through them, us today was that a great nation can only be the consequence of the people it comprises. I come from the bush, born to a cattle-grazing family in far north-west Queensland. I went to school in Brisbane and then returned to the bush where I met and married the love of my life, Fiona, the girl next door—200 kilometres away! We subsequently had two beautiful daughters who, with their husbands and now our two grandchildren, live in the United States, and we miss them. Although my family had been graziers for over a 100 years, having settled in the Charters Towers area in the 1860s before there was a Charters Towers, in my early 20s, drought and predatory banks drove my wife and I off the land. Thereafter, Fiona and I spent our working lives as our children were growing up in and around regional towns over the years covering the length and breadth of the state. I’ve been a grazier, a builder’s labourer, a pilot, a light aircraft manufacturer, a gas industry worker and a hotelier. Most recently, before entering the Senate late last year, my family and I ran a hotel in Gladstone. Like most blokes from the bush 40 years ago, I was a committed National Party supporter. I was always a Joh (Bjelke-Petersen) man and, to this day, I regard the Joh era as Queensland’s golden age. It was only the fact that the National Party abandoned Joh’s legacy and moved to the left 25 years ago that led me to switch to One Nation. But that didn’t work out so well. I am consequently very happy to have joined Katter’s Australian Party, a genuinely democratic party in which senators and members get to vote first and foremost in accordance with their conscience and their constituents’ wishes. KAP to me represents a continuation of the conservative values, commitment to rural and regional development, opposition to migration without assimilation and a focus on economic nationalism of the Joh era Nationals, which strongly reflects my own beliefs. It is a party in which loyalty isn’t a one-way street and where leadership is more than a cardboard cut-out. As a conservative Christian, I strongly support traditional social values, but, as an Australian nationalist, I also believe in Australia and Australians first. I believe in low taxes and personal responsibility and in the virtues of hard work and thrift, reward for effort and the freedom to do and say what you think. I also believe in the right of people to raise their kids in accordance with their own values, without a bunch of nanny state meddlers and cultural Marxists trying to re-engineer them. I believe that the key role of government is to provide laws for the enforcement of contracts, to provide physical security for businesses and individuals and to build infrastructure. I believe that the priority for government expenditure is not obligation-free handouts but nation building: providing the facilities and infrastructure which businesses and farmers need to develop and grow, which then provides for secure, well-paid jobs. I believe that ordinary working people have the right to expect a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work, to keep what they have worked for, to get ahead and have a decent life, to be able to provide for themselves in old age, and to have enough to help their kids have an even better life than themselves. I believe that the unfettered ownership of private property and the right to own and use firearms, including for self-defence, are the God-given rights of free people everywhere. And I believe, as the American revolutionaries did, that government is usually the problem not the solution and that, in order for people to be free, the power of government needs to be constrained.

I remember Queensland as it was in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, when working blokes could get good, well-paying jobs actually making products for us to buy; when people could start small businesses and not be strangled by red tape; when car rego, stamp duty and rates were affordable; when electricity was the cheapest in the world; when, through statutory and orderly marketing, farmers were not bled white by rapacious corporations or forced to sell to Chinese carpetbaggers; when you could say what you thought without being charged with a crime; and when we could all enjoy our leisure time without all the nanny state restrictions and prohibitions.

Fifty years ago Australia was a cohesive, predominantly Anglo-Celtic nation. Most people thought of themselves as Christian of some sort, although most of us didn’t go to church all that often. Everyone, from the cleaners to the captains of industry, had a shared vision of who we were as a people and our place in the world. Until the late 1960s, prior to the rise of Whitlam in the Labor Party, there was a broad consensus between the Liberal and Labor parties on the kind of society we were and what we should be in the future. In the 1960s, both Liberal and Labor parties reflected a common framework of Judeo-Christian values, supporting the family as the basic unit of society. They both supported the principle that marriage was a union between a man and woman, and both parties recognised the sanctity of the lives of the unborn. Both major parties agreed that people should be free to live their own lives and say what they thought without fear of state sanction. Both sides of politics recognised the importance of our manufacturing industries as well as our farming and mining. Both parties recognised the importance of our predominantly European identity.

A key part of this great pre-Whitlam consensus was bipartisan support from both Liberal and Labor for a European based immigration program. The great Labor statesmen Ben Chifley, John Curtin and Arthur Calwell all strongly supported an immigration program that actively discriminated in favour of Europeans. Australia’s greatest conservative, Sir Robert Menzies himself, said: I don’t want to see reproduced in Australia the kind of problem they have in South Africa or in America or increasingly in Great Britain. I think— a European based immigration program has— … been a very good policy and it’s been of great value to us … This continued until 1973 when Whitlam and his hard Left cronies adopted Soviet inspired UN treaties on discrimination and banned preferential selection of migrants based on their ethnicity. Yet the end of the pre-Whitlam consensus between the Labor and Liberal Parties has been much more than a political sea change. It has allowed the cultural conquest of our nation.

A tectonic shift has occurred in which the previously agreed social and political order has been overthrown in an insidious silent revolution. To understand fully what has happened to our country, I believe that we must look to the work of the Italian (jewish) Marxist Antonio Gramsci. Gramsci’s insight was to see revolution in cultural rather than economic terms, with ‘cultural hegemony’ as the key to supposed class dominance. The Marxist state, Gramsci argued, could be achieved by gradual cultural revolution—subverting society via a long march through the institutions. The tactics of latter-day Gramsci-inspired radicals were to disguise degeneracy as liberation and tyranny as compassion. Free speech could be eliminated by appeal to not ‘offending’ or ‘saying things that were hurtful’. This, of course, subtly creates a subjective test by which all criticism of the cultural Marxist agenda can be silenced. It is my understanding that Gramsci himself coined the term ‘political correctness’ to describe obedience to the will of the Communist Party. However he made clear that its final purpose was to force concurrence with those things which individuals knew to be false. If an individual could be induced to agree and state to others something they knew to be utterly false such as black being white, then the party had achieved total moral and ethical surrender in the subject. Thus, to describe the so-called ‘safe schools’ and ‘gender fluidity’ garbage being peddled in schools as ‘cultural Marxism’ is not a throwaway line but a literal truth. Given that everyone knows there are only two genders, if you can be persuaded to agree to and advocate in support of the false claim that there are ‘an infinite number of genders’, then, without realising it, you have surrendered your political soul. Today, with so many unwittingly in lock-step, marching to the cultural revolutionaries’ tune, options to oppose them politically are increasingly limited. So that’s why I joined Katter’s Australian Party, the only political force that seeks a return to the pre-Whitlam consensus. I want to see the defeat of the cultural Marxists and their ilk and a rolling back of the subversion of Australian culture and values that they have wrought. In terms of specifics, my political goals are: · to break the oligopoly power of the banks; to get a better deal for working families and farmers, to achieve major infrastructure development in Far North and Western Queensland; to reduce immigration levels and restrict entry to those who will best assimilate; to restore personal freedom and free speech; to make affordable homeownership a national priority; to counter the growing threat of China both outside and within Australia; to slash runaway government spending and, with it, taxes on productive enterprises; to build coal-fired power stations to return us to the cheapest power in the world; to slash the regulatory burden that is crippling the general aviation industry; and to take back our culture from the left-wing extremists.

My most immediate concern is saving agriculture in this country. Only this morning, we heard the appalling personal stories of 40 farmers and others whose family businesses were stolen and who were ruined by the criminal behavior of the major banks. This is the reason that I fought, along with my colleague Barry O’Sullivan, for a royal commission into banking. However, it has quickly become clear that the terms of reference are far too narrow and the ability of the commission to hear evidence far too limited. That is the reason that I moved earlier today to increase the time and resources of the royal commission, extend the terms of reference and consider dispute resolution processes. Those lenders and particular liquidators, receivers and administrators who have behaved contrary to any acceptable moral standard must be exposed and made to pay for their crimes. I’m happy to report that that motion got up. An incident having occurred in the gallery. However, this is only the first step. I also want to see a permanent end to the scourge of usury in rural lending. The banks’ criminal treatment of so many farmers, which has led to the loss of family farms—owned for generations—and waves of rural suicides, must be ended once and for all. I believe that the solution is the re-establishment of rural redevelopment state banks, along the lines of the former Queensland Industry Development Corporation established by Sir Leo Hielscher, the internationally respected former Queensland Treasury undersecretary and the architect of Queensland’s Joh-era prosperity. Like the QIDC, a rural development and reconstruction state bank would not be subject to APRA lending guidelines and would be able to make lending judgments based on long-term rural property viability and not just short-term variations of commodity prices or rainfall, just like old country bank managers used to do. The RDRSB would also be empowered to buy up existing so-called ‘distressed’ loans from banks, saving tens of thousands of farmers from hardship and ruin. In this way, the scourge of usury in rural lending can be ended for all time. In terms of rebuilding rural incomes, the abolition of statutory marketing boards 20 years ago has generally not seen any meaningful reduction in prices for consumers, just a net wealth transfer from farmers to middlemen and giant supermarket chains. This has driven many farmers to ruin and even suicide. I would like to see the reestablishment of orderly marketing of agricultural products via grower co-ops to allow collective bargaining by farmers for the sale of their produce. This would return to the farmers greater control of their own industries and a greater share of the retail value of their products. Collectively, these measures would go a long way to rebuild our crucial rural industries.

My next biggest concern is rural infrastructure development. First and foremost, my priority is water. Thanks to grossly inadequate water capture and storage, less than one per cent of the rainwater that falls on this continent is captured and used. Nowhere is this infrastructure failure more acute than in the bush. I want to remedy this. My first solution is to build the Bradfield scheme. In 1938, JJC Bradfield, the same civil engineer who designed both the Sydney Harbour and Story bridges, proposed a massive irrigation plan to turn the far northern rivers inland to irrigate vast areas west of the dividing range. The scheme involved diverting water from the upper reaches of the Johnson, Tully, Herbert and Burdekin rivers, which, fed by the annual monsoon, currently flow out into the ocean. Envisaged was the construction of a series of massive dams in north and western Queensland. It would also include raising the wall of the existing Burdekin Falls Dam by 14.6 metres, as intended in the original Joh-era plan, which would increase its capacity by nearly five times and droughtproof Townsville for the next century. Water accumulating was then proposed to be diverted through a tunnel under the Great Dividing Range. When completed, the Bradfield scheme would be the greatest nation-building project this country has ever seen, totally dwarfing the Snowy scheme, and would, at a stroke, ensure the prosperity of Australia for many generations to come. This would provide employment for many tens of thousands of people and would not only ensure our own food requirements are met but also provide food for many hundreds of thousands in other countries as well. To imagine the benefits of the Bradfield proposal, we only need to see what has been achieved in places like Israel and California, both places in which virtual deserts have been transformed into enormous food bowls which help drive their respective economies. My second infrastructure priority is ports. A key issue in determining the profitability of exports of mining and primary products is the distance they have to be carried to reach a port. In the UK, there is a port every 65 kilometres. In the most productive parts of India, its 57 kilometres. But in Queensland, it’s 1,000 kilometres. Rather than taking the product to the port, the solution is to take the port to the product. Microports constructed along the Queensland coast every 60 to 80 kilometres would greatly increase the viability of exports. And it goes without saying that I’m an enthusiastic supporter of mining, including coalmine development in the Galilee Basin. I strongly support government building the required railway to allow mining in this area to proceed. It would be the salvation of Townsville. Of course, to more effectively manage our resources with regard to proposals like the Bradfield Scheme, multiple microport construction, Galilee Basin coalmines et cetera, we have to have the political will to remove the obstacles put in the way of progress by extreme left-wing Luddites. Only by following the example of true nation-building leaders like Ben Chifley, Bob Menzies, John Curtin and Joh can we hope to provide for the security and prosperity of generations to come.

The next critical problem that we need to address is immigration. Australia currently has the highest per capita immigration rate in the world. Last Tuesday, Australia’s population hit 25 million—22 years ahead of previous government predictions. That means that since 1971 the population of Australia has doubled, with immigrants now around one-third of our population. The huge numbers of people allowed to flood into Australia in recent years are unsustainable, with immigration quotas apparently set by successive governments on a whim and without any regard for the necessary infrastructure that these people would require or the ability of those that came here to assimilate. Ethnocultural diversity, which is known to undermine social cohesion, has been allowed to rise to dangerous levels in many suburbs. In direct response, self-segregation, including white flight from poorer inner-urban areas, has become the norm. I believe that immigration to our country should be a privilege, not an obligation-free right provided to anyone from the Third World who demands it. First, 457 visas, which simply steal jobs from Australians, should be abolished unless expressly approved by the immigration minister. This will create more jobs for Australians and end the massive rorting of these for backdoor permanent immigration. Second, ‘family reunion’ must be restricted to the husband or wife and/or dependent children within a family. Third, student visas should be drastically reduced in number. This will create more university places for Australians, whose parents have actually paid for the universities with their taxes in the first place. Those studying here who decide to apply to immigrate should be required to return to their country of origin after their qualification and to apply as part of the general migration program. Fourth, net immigration must be reduced to a level which can be supported and, therefore, must be set following detailed modelling and planning for the associated necessary accommodation, facilities and infrastructure. Fifth, but most important of all, diversity should be managed to remain compatible with social cohesion and national identity.

We as a nation are entitled to insist that those who are allowed to come here predominantly reflect the historic European Christian composition of Australian society and embrace our language, culture and values as a people. In order for us to remain the nation that we are now, those who come here need to assimilate and integrate. Those who are most similar to the mainstream majority in terms of ethnicity, culture, language and values most readily do so. Historically, however, the one immigrant group here and in other Western nations that has consistently shown itself to be the least able to assimilate and integrate is Muslims. The first terrorist act on Australian soil was in 1915, when two Muslim immigrants opened fire on a picnic train of innocent women and children in Broken Hill—and Muslim immigrants have been a problem ever since. To paraphrase the words of Sir Winston Churchill: The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power.

The influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those that follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. I believe that the reasons for ending all further Muslim immigration are both compelling and self-evident. The record of Muslims who have already come to this country in rates of crime, welfare dependency and terrorism is the worst of any migrants and vastly exceeds any other immigrant groups. A majority of Muslims in Australia of working age do not work and live on welfare. Muslims in New South Wales and Victoria are three times more likely than other groups to be convicted of crimes. We have black African Muslim gangs terrorising Melbourne. We have ISIS-sympathising Muslims trying to go overseas to fight for ISIS and, while all Muslims are not terrorists, certainly all terrorists these days are Muslims. So why would anyone want to bring more of them here?

Finally, it should go without saying that, as a nation, we are entitled to require that those who come here not only have useful work skills and qualifications but also the commitment to work and pay taxes. In truth, it appears that many of those who claim to be asylum seekers are actually just welfare seekers who only come to Australia to live on welfare in public housing at the expense of working Australians. In the days of Menzies, immigrants arriving here were not allowed to apply for welfare and that attracted exactly the right sort of hard-working people this country needed. We should go back to that and ban all immigrants receiving welfare for the first five years after they arrive. The final solution to the immigration problem is, of course, a popular vote. We don’t need a plebiscite to cut immigration numbers; we just need a government that is willing to institute a sustainable population policy, end Australian-job-stealing 457 visas and make student visas conditional on foreign students returning to the country they came from. What we do need a plebiscite for is to decide who comes here. Whitlam didn’t ask the Australian people whether they wanted wholesale non-European migration when he introduced it and neither has any subsequent government. Who we allow to come here will determine what sort of nation we will have in the future, so therefore this isn’t the right of any one government to decide. It’s too important for that. Instead, we need a plebiscite to allow the Australian people to decide whether they want wholesale non-English speaking immigrants from the Third World and, in particular, whether they want any Muslims or whether they want to return to the predominantly European immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus. I for one will be very happy to abide by their decision.

My next political objective is affordable home ownership. Home ownership is a vital social good. It not only steadily improves the net wealth of Australians but provides for a comfortable and secure retirement. It also provides an asset for us all to pass onto our children. However, thanks to foreign property speculators and spiraling demand from excessive immigration, housing prices have been absurdly inflated and, as a result, Australian home ownership levels are starting to fall. Today, first homebuyers see the dream of home ownership receding like a mirage. This disastrous state of affairs must be reversed. I would like to see a return to the policy of earlier decades in which those who were not permanent residents or Australian citizens were barred from buying residential property. In addition to a drastic immigration cut, I want to see a statutory cap on state government fees and charges, which currently make up 50 per cent of land cost, reducing them to no more than 25 per cent. In industry, I would like to see the re-establishment of Australian manufacturing via a collaborative relationship between pro-business unions and business leaders, as occurred in Germany in the aftermath of World War II. Konrad Adenauer’s postwar German economic miracle, which ultimately led to both high wages and high profits for companies, is a model for the re-industrialisation of Australia and a means to return to widespread employment in secondary industry. While Australian wages mean that we cannot compete on price with Third World slave labour manufacturers, we should not need to. First, products of high quality and value can already be produced and sold successfully despite paying reasonable wages. A classic example of this is RM Williams. Second, to help re-establish Australian manufacturing, import restrictions on certain classes of goods should also be considered, following the example of Taiwan, which successfully transitioned from a rural tea-growing province to a manufacturing dynamo with high wage levels. As Australian icon Dick Smith has asked: are Australians prepared to pay a bit more for manufactured goods if it means that their kids will have a job? I think so. That is what I’m asking the Australian people to do so that we can rebuild our manufacturing industries and create hundreds of thousands of jobs in manufacturing. I also have fiscal objectives. I’d like to see a drastic cut in government spending and borrowing, but, with around 50 per cent of the budget now consumed by welfare, no spending reform is possible without welfare reform. The age pension should be quarantined from any cuts, however. Instead, reform needs to begin with working-class income replacement welfare. We constantly hear that Australia has less than six per cent unemployment when, in fact, this is simply false. If we count the legions of professional freeloaders who are of working age and have settled into a life without work, on pensions, we actually have around 20 per cent paid unemployment in this country. Welfare needs to be a safety net for those of us who are temporarily in need of income support. If people of working age receive a pension from the state, then they have opted out of the workforce permanently and expect everyone else to carry them for life. I believe this is unsustainable and totally un-Australian. Unless we are going to follow the path of Greece, we need to stop finding new ways to give handouts and start increasing workforce participation.

The best form of welfare is a job, and massive investment in nation-building infrastructure is the first step to helping to create jobs. Finally, and perhaps most importantly of all, I want to see a cultural counter-revolution to restore a central role for traditional values, to redefine our national identity and to create a new social contract between the governing and the governed. So many of the anti-democratic controls on our liberty, on the restriction of free speech, on our ability to decide who comes to this country and on the outpouring of foreign aid have been driven by the gross abuse of the external affairs powers in section 51 of the Constitution. Since Whitlam—and clearly contrary to the intent of our founding fathers—the external affairs powers given to the Commonwealth to sign treaties with other nations has been abused to overrule other provisions of the Constitution and override other laws made by our own democratically elected representatives. I do not only want to withdraw from these UN treaties but want to counter the dictatorial intent of the successors of Whitlam with an amendment to section 51 of the Constitution. This needs to specifically prohibit the signing of any treaty contrary to any other provision of the Constitution or existing Australian laws.

More broadly, however, what we need is a cultural reconquest of our own country to take back Australia from Gramsci-inspired left-wing elites that have subverted the very basis of our society, for in the end what is Australia? What makes Australia a nation is not the happenstance of shared geography but what unites us: our common history, values, language and ethnicity, our common culture and our shared vision of our future as a people. Ethnicity is not just skin-deep. More than anything else, it is our ethnoreligious identity that defines us and shapes our national identity. Few nations are fortunate enough to have so condensed their national character in so short a space of time that, 60 years after Federation, all who lived here, from children to old men, from paupers to Prime Ministers, could have a shared understanding of who we were that crossed the political divide. But today all that is rapidly unraveling, and we stand now at the turn of the tide. The great cohesive vision of our nation’s founding fathers, all that those who came before us struggled to build, all that our fathers and grandfathers fought wars to defend, stands at hazard as the stranglehold of the Gramsci-ite elites on our institutions, political organisations and the media continues to tighten. Now, on the brink of irreversible change, it is time for us to decide whether we as a people will rise up against this, hold fast to the crimson threads of kinship that define and unite us and strive once more for the light on the hill or concede the field to enemies of Western civilization and see all that we were and all that we might yet have become fall away to ruin.

Transcript Source

Thank you Mr. Anning for having the courage to say what all the other useless, pathetic, piece of shit, treasonous bastards in parliament would never dare to.

– BDL1983

Axe-Wielding Afghan Goes On Rampage On German Train

Surprise, surprise. Here we go again….

Blood everywhere inside the train.

Blood everywhere inside the train.

From Fox News:

Multiple people were injured after a teenage Afghan refugee went on a slashing spree armed with an axe and knife on a train in southern Germany on Monday night before he was shot to death by police, officials said.

Wuerzburg police said on their Facebook page that three of the victims suffered serious injuries and one was slightly injured. Another 14 people were being treated for shock.

Bavaria’s top security official, state Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann, told Germany’s ARD television that the attacker had been identified as a 17-year-old Afghan refugee.

Herrmann said initial information was that the suspect came to Germany as an unaccompanied minor and had lived in the Wuerzburg area for some time, initially at a refugee facility in the town of Ochsenfurt and more recently with a foster family.

Read More

For fuck’s sake, this shit is just getting crazy. If people can’t work out why fucking shit-skin Afghans don’t belong in Germany, then they are idiots. German people do not do this sort of thing. However, an “axe-wielding slashing rampage” is just the sort of thing you’d expect from a fucking useless arab, and it’s exactly what’s happened here.

My blood boils every time I hear the latest thing the shit-skins have been up to in Europe. These people are fucking scum and White folks better damn well get that through their thick heads, and quickly! If not, then this shit-skin behaviour is just going to happen more and more often until Western Civilization is no more. The rate we’re going we should all look into candle manufacturing as a business opportunity. It may well be the west’s number one industry in the future given the number of fucking vigils the weaklings like having.

– BDL1983

Today’s Society Is Pathetic

We’re all used to it now. Every second day it seems there is another terrorist attack of some sort. Whether it’s a genuine Moslem attack or a Mossad operation is beside the point. The overall reaction of society toward being attacked is retarded and it’s the same over and over again.

Who gives a fuck whether you're afraid or not?

Who gives a fuck whether you’re afraid or not?

I just don’t get it. Do these candle-lit vigil attendees and “Not Afraid” card holders actually think what they are doing is going to make one iota of difference to the crazed perpetrators of “terror“? As you are being blown up the last thing of any relevance is your emotional state! Saying that you are not afraid and burning candles in order to prevent further attacks is without doubt the most stupid response imaginable. It boggles the mind.

What also boggles the mind is the typical complete lack of anger in people. When you’re attacked isn’t it a natural instinct to seek out and deal with the attackers? Well, where the hell is the general anger at the attackers and their associated religion/ideology. Why is there no will to do anything about it? The lack of anger is remarkable, to say the least.

If you have a problem the first thing you do is try to identify the cause. Once the cause is known, you then try and get rid of it so you can be problem-free, right? Well, let’s just take the usual mainstream narrative of the “terrorist attack” – Moslem goes to crowded place, blows a bunch of people up or shoots them or runs them over (new one) or whatever, and that’s about it. Now, considering this same narrative has occurred over and over again and the attacks just keep coming, wouldn’t a logically minded person (or nation) want to root out the cause so the attacks stop? I mean, call me crazy, but is that not a fair way of analysing the scenario? All it takes is some brainy-act to sit down and go, “hmmm, there seems to be a pattern here and a certain underlying cause…” In this scenario it’s “Moslems come to country, blow people up”. Wasn’t happening before they started coming, but it is now, therefore they are the underlying cause. To fix the problem Moslems must be removed or it’ll just keep happening. It’s not rocket science and if the authorities were genuinely concerned about the “terror” problem, then this would be the first measure taken. That is simple logic.

Instead of using logic though, the reality is like this:

“Well, it’s not all Moslems” – Of course not all Moslems have committed acts of “terror”. If they had then the whole planet would be blown to fuck already! Accepting them into your country is akin to eating apples with the knowledge that 1 in 50 is poisoned. It’s not a bright idea is it?

“We should stand in ‘solidarity’ with Moslems because they’re the real victims” – What the fuck kind of logic is that? If they’re the ones doing the blowing up, then they are the perpetrators. The victims are the ones that got blown up. People are fucking dopes if they can’t work that out (and they cant).

So when you add together all this fucking ‘solidarity’ crap and multikulti at all costs, basically you have a recipe for disaster. If you are going to stand side by side with your racial enemies and invite them in to live with you, then what the fuck? You can’t expect things to turn out well.

Moslems (1)

Trying to live in ‘solidarity’ with people like this isn’t a good idea.

Anyone with eyes should be able to tell that Moslems are never going to be any fun to live with. Why would you want them in the first place? They’re all nothing but trouble. Mark my words.

– BDL1983

French Insanity Update

Thank you Andrew for saying it and saving me the trouble:

valls

Regarding the “totally unpredictable” French terror attacks:

Hollande came out with some stupid talk following the attacks. Something about how France is stronger than the terrorists – a statement which has no meaning.

Other world leaders came out with various stupid, meaningless statements along these same lines of “we shall prevail.”

Read More

It’s all akin to “we’re going to fix it with candle-lit vigils” basically. Well, good luck with that you fucking do-gooder dickheads!!

– BDL1983

Aussie Election Day Tomorrow…

Tomorrow is the once every three years event where we get to head to the polls and make our votes count…..

Bob Dole or CLIN-TON?

Bob Dole or CLIN-TON? Either way, they’ll exchange long protein strands in private!

…… Well, that’s what they’d like us to think anyway. Of course, voting makes no difference when essentially your choices are Tweedledee or Tweedledum.

So, just to get the political passions flowing, let’s examine (mock) the two characters, one of whom will be the Prime Minister after tomorrows proceedings. My bet is on the “same old same old”, I.e. no change in PM, but only time will tell (bite nails with anticipation)!

First up we have this person:

Current PM Malcolm Turnbull - looks trustworthy...

Current PM Malcolm Turnbull – Looks trustworthy…

I’m quite sure he will win tomorrows election. Not because he’s anything great, but because his opposition is even more fundamentally unappealing, which we’ll get to in a second. If you’re Australian you are probably familiar with him minus the Jew hat, up there smiling at the TV camera and speaking in a Prime-Ministerial way. If you compare how Turnbull comes across compared to Tony Abbott, then you will see why they got rid of Abbott. He was all ‘ummmms and aaaaaahs’ stuttering around trying to put a sentence together. Turnbull can at least form sentences and he’s very good friends with the Jewish community, being one himself!

Now to the opposition.

This is Malcolm’s rival:

Labor leader Bill Shorten - Also very trustworthy....

Labor leader Bill Shorten – Also very trustworthy….

The thing about Bill Shorten is that he doesn’t look the part for Prime Minister, despite the signage behind him in that picture. He comes across as a small weaselly type of man, and although he can speak, he doesn’t have the ability to make himself seem like someone capable of leadership. This is why he will lose the election.

Apart from the above, he is of course (like all Labor politicians) an ex-unionist, which means essentially a communist or not far off. These types are all the same and I hate them all.

Another thing Bill has working against him is that he has a very funny shaped head. This picture helps illuminate:

AlienBill

Alien Bill.

Although it’s obviously a digitally altered image, Bill Shorten doesn’t look a bit out of place in Star Trek garb. The top of his head is so large that if he were painted light green he could easily audition for an acting role as an alien. I suspect he is part-alien, part-man, and is on a mission to deceive us all!

He also reminds me of these two:

Kodos and Kang.

Kodos and Kang.

“You won’t win, so return to your home planet Bill. Let the earthlings live freely” – election message from Kodos.

Who’ll it be? Jew Malcolm or Commie Bill? The choice is agonizing.

Happy voting tomorrow Australia!

– BDL1983

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – Straight Cucked!

Here’s an article written by a mate of mine from the Australia First Party.

Pen Name: Mr Happy Pantß – Hahaha…..

What does the term “cucked” mean?”

You might say:

A new-found adjective, deriving from the term ‘cuckold’, popularised in the US as a weapon to cut the legs from underneath neo-cons who put the interests of foreigners before their own fellow countrymen.

Originally an S&M term for a white male who watches on as a black male has it on with his wife – coming from the practice of the cuckoo bird, which will eat another birds eggs & lay it’s own in their place, leaving the unsuspecting parent to rear it’s young, thereby ‘cuckolding’ that parent bird.

This then also becomes a tag for those who would literally take on offspring from outside races into their family (or by extension: into their nation) & treat them as their own, literally.

The One Nation Party fits these pyjamas snug like a pair of bike pants – a so-called “Nationalist” party, who go out of their way to stress that “Australia is multiracial”, even more so than the bloody mainstream parties!

I’ve already confronted Pauline on her absolutely cucked policy on multiculturalism & she went on to point out that Yugoslavians, Ukrainians, Italians and Greeks all “assimilated” well to Australian culture, so therefore we must excuse non-white immigration into Australia provided they all assimilate, of course…

Pauline-Hanson-goes-Cuckservative

Recalling this conversation reminds me of the infamous “Brangelina” Cucks!

Pathological altruism gone mad

Pathological altruism gone mad

I tagged along to a small meeting chaired by Pauline’s SA candidate Steve Burgess, just for a sticky-beak. He opened the meeting, not with a welcome, but with, “Australia is a multiracial society. Everybody agree…?” As if that hadn’t made me sick enough, he was met with a unanimous, resounding “Yes” from the 16 or so around the table.

Discussing this with Steve the same day I confronted Pauline, he also defended Asian immigrant “Australians” saying, “they work hard…” Bit of a stark contrast to Pauline’s ’98 rhetoric about “defending Australia from the Asian invasion”. But hey, she’s cleared that up – we all just got the wrong idea after the media fabricated footage of her literally saying “Australia is being swamped by Asians”.

sketch-1465250237448

Steve loves his new boat kids more than his old kids. They assimilate very well!

A wander into Steve’s page on the One Nation website brought no surprises. Steve fights for Australians. Well that’s good. But unfortunately, his definition of the term Australian, just like Pauline’s, is straight out of the greens play-book.

IMG_20160607_214940

Come here, work & we couldn’t care less who you are. We’ll even fight for your rights!

Looking at One Nation’s policy on multiculturalism, one has to wonder how this garbage can be palatable to any of Pauline’s followers. The conclusion is then reached that they obviously haven’t read it. It states that, while being FOR Multi-racialism, they will “abolish multiculturalism & promote assimilation & NATIONALISM to the non-white hordes.”(!!!) Right……

Yep, gonna teach this lot some "Australian Nationalism" - then sit back while they assimilate.

Yep, gonna teach this lot some “Australian Nationalism” – then sit back while they ASSIMILATE?!

It’s also interesting to note the amount of friendly publicity Pauline’s been receiving the last month or so, compared to the sort of publicity genuine nationalists receive. More to the point, compared to the negative publicity Pauline received back in ’98.

pauline-and-demi

Pauline's had to do a lot of virtue signalling to regain status as a mainstream politician

Pauline’s had to do a lot of virtue signalling to regain status as a mainstream politician.

She’s definitely managed to turn things around in the media, which leads many of us to certain conclusions. In fact, she’s turned her whole ideology around!

One Nation's new ideal - the assimilated "Australian" family

One Nation’s new ideal – the assimilated “Australian” family.

And thus, one question this author would like to put to Pauline & crew is this: how much of One Nation’s funding has come from sources tied to the Liberal Party &/or JEWISH sources?

Given that her policies are now perfectly in line with the single issue anti-Islamist groups like Reclaim Australia and Australian Liberty Alliance, it is fair to assume she is another sell-out, just like all the other “Kosher conservatives.” The anti-Islam stuff and pro-multicultural rhetoric used by One Nation and these fake groups is only there to serve Israeli war interests in the mid-east and the Jewish led agenda to destroy Australia’s White identity.

Source Article

– Mr Happy Pantß

Love & Hate…. AGAIN!

Remember - one doesn't exist without the other.

Remember – one doesn’t exist without the other.

The thing about us allegedly being driven by hate never stops coming up. According to the leftist Jew-loving communist types, people of our political persuasion are just about the only people on the planet who’ve ever hated anything. Without us the world would be one big happy love-fest, arms linked around a camp fire singing ‘Kumbaya’….. Yeah right.

Well, in multicultural tolerance land this happens all the time. Why don't you White Supremacists get on board?

Well, in “multicultural tolerance land” this happens all the time. Why don’t you White Supremacists get on board?

So why mention all this again? Because if you have a look at the faces in this article it is clear which side of the political divide is driven by hatred. It is definitely not our side, and I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone who’d claim to be driven by hatred. The hatred I encounter all the time from our side is a perfectly rational one. Since the Jews and commie bastards want to destroy our race, which we love (sometimes I don’t know why), then it follows that you will hate them for wanting to do that!

We would never have to explain such simple concepts as ‘opposing emotions’ if humans weren’t such a dim-witted species. Unfortunately, humans ARE dim-witted for the most part, so here we go again:

Everything is explained in this old article which I may as well re-post in its entirety:

The Thing About Love And Hate.

We often hear a lot in this ‘movement’ about there being too much hate. People often complain about hate as if it is somehow an irrational, unnecessary emotion for humans to feel toward someone or something. Well, the truth of the matter is that if hate were an unnecessary part of the human make-up, then we would have been born with an innate inability to feel hate. Anyone who is honest and has more than half a brain knows that they hate certain things in life – everyone does. There’s nothing wrong with feeling hate. It’s natural, normal and healthy.

Love and hate are polar opposites emotionally. This is a simple fact of nature, like how good and evil are also polar opposites. This is where the cunning Jew likes to confuse matters. The Jew knows very well that 99% of well-intentioned people like the sound of “love and good” far more than they like the sound of “hate and evil”. So, being the eternal deceiver and liar that he is, he tricks people’s minds into believing that ‘hate’ = ‘evil’, and ‘love’ = ‘good’. It is a cunning deception as usual, but it can be easily exposed for the deception it is by highlighting the fact that if hate equals evil, and love equals good, then why would we need different words to express the exact same emotion? Hate is not necessarily evil, nor is love necessarily good – this is what the Jew doesn’t want anyone to think about rationally and it’s also why they put so much effort into ‘combating hate’ and crap like that. The purpose of their campaign against ‘hate’ is to turn whatever it is that someone doesn’t like into a psychological disorder then get “Dr. Rosenblum” to prescribe Jew psychiatric pharmaceuticals to cure the ‘hater’!

A couple simple case examples:

If someone came to your house, murdered your family and stole a bunch of things, would you hate them? Of course you would! The ‘hate’ in this case is a healthy force for good! If you loved this person you’d be a mental patient.

If someone helped you through some personal problems, let you use their car, and gave you some financial help, would you love and appreciate them? Of course you would! The ‘love’ in this case is a wholesome healthy emotion! If you hated this person you’d be a mental patient once again!

I rest my case.

The main reason I think they are so fixated on eliminating ‘hate’ is because Jews know that Jewish behaviour is so fundamentally unlikeable to anyone of any race, that portraying the ‘hater’ as a social outcast or a psychopath is the only tactic they can use to convince the rest of society that “this is where ‘hating’ gets you”. The Jews know damn well that when the inevitable backlash against them comes, they want a world with as few ‘haters’ as possible – haters of them, that is. Funny how the Jew doesn’t care about any communist or left-wing hate which is very, very often directed toward us, and blatantly so. Once again the Jew is exposed for the hypocritical liar that he is!

This is how ‘love and hate’ works through my eyes:

We, on the National Socialist truthful-side-of-politics stand for and love our own race (despite their current problematic state). This comes from our innate healthy instincts which tell us to do so. These instincts are strong and can’t be over-ridden. It follows logically from here that since we are telling the truth about our love for our race, then we would also hate anything and everything which poses a threat to our racial well-being and survival. That’s just common sense from my perspective.

They, on the Jewish/Communist/Left-Wing side of politics hate our White race. They seek our destruction because as an infinitely more capable race than any other, we shatter their stupid and utterly wrongful delusions of racial equality and multiculturalism. We are the only real threat to the Jewish plan for world domination and the Communists idea of everyone being equal. Clearly they are the psychopathic side of this argument, since all of their ideas are not based on reality or nature, but on delusion! The only love felt on this side of the political fence is self-love and the love of their own unrestrained egoism. This is because they have nothing worth loving, no true ideals, and are either Jews or disaffected, detached individuals with no capacity for truly caring about the most important thing everyone has right in front of them – their own genetic race – their own bloodline!

The Jews (and their lackeys) hate us because our race is an obstacle to them achieving their agenda. There is no other reason for their hatred of us; for they know very well that we have not persecuted them. We have always been provoked by them and eventually got fed up with their behaviour and given them the boot!

We hate the Jews because of what they do. If they didn’t constantly work toward our racial destruction and just left us alone and went and lived among themselves somewhere else, then we would never have had a problem with them! It’s that simple.

Finally, to any of our Jewish friends or communist lackeys reading this – here’s something to bear in mind:

When the White man with racial love and pride in his heart finally gets furious, you’ll find out that your hatred is nothing compared to ours, for you have no true love. We do, and it gives us infinite strength to crush our enemies with!

This quote from George Lincoln Rockwell sums the situation up nicely:

Without a deadly hatred of that which threatens what we love, love is an empty catchword for hippies, queers, and cowards…

Also very relevant reading: Why I Stand For What I Stand For!

– BDL1983

Australia First Party Protests Harvey Norman Over Their Hiring Policy

Our protest on Saturday. Note "RAPEfugees" on the banner. That was good!

Our protest on Saturday at Harvey Norman Gepps Cross.

Billionaire Gerry Harvey decided recently that he’d prefer to offer jobs in his Harvey Norman electrical appliance store chain to none other than 12,000 Syrian RAPEfugees, rather than give some jobless Australians a chance. What a low-life scumbag selling his own struggling countrymen up shit creek! We thought we’d give him a piece of our mind so we stood out there with our signs, passed out a few leaflets etc, for about 45 minutes or so. I know it’s only a small thing to do, but at least we did something to try and get the right message out there in the real world!

The public response was 80-90% positive I’d say, apart from a couple disinterested ethnic sorts, which is to be expected, and a couple of disgruntled granny’s who were too crazy to care what anyone’s got to say anymore regardless! Store management wasn’t overly thrilled to see us there, but they didn’t care too much provided we didn’t harass the customers. We just agreed with management since we weren’t harassing them anyway, and carried on as before. And that was it, pretty much. Then we had a few beers afterwards.

Sydney Protest November Last Year:

HardlyNormalsProtestSydney

AustFirst

– BDL1983

Why I Stand For What I Stand For!

Adolf Hitler - we need another one!

Adolf Hitler – we need another one!

I’m going to explain a few things here in relatively simple terms, so anyone who is confused or wondering what motivates me can refer to this article.

What Sort Of Society Do I Want To Live In?

I want to live in a society among my own kind, meaning my own race. I do not want to live among those of other races because they are not of my blood and do not share a common world view and basic morality with my race – the White Aryan race. Different breeds (races) of humans are different, and for that reason alone it should make sense to anyone with a thinking brain to keep them separate. Now, despite the fact that there are plenty of arsehole Whites around the place, I’d still a million times over prefer to live with them than non-whites. As for all the Whites who’s natural sense of morality has been led astray, well they need to be re-educated to adhere to proper Christian principles.

Essentially I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality, similar to what we saw in National Socialist Germany. There’s nothing devious or tricky about any of this. It is what it is.

Am I an “Extremist”?

It is not “extreme” to want to live in a White nation with Christian morality. It is a perfectly rational desire for any White person who wants their race and themselves to have a decent future. What is extreme though, is this Jewish agenda to try and force all the non-whites and their foreign belief systems into any White living space, anywhere on earth! That is fucking nuts, pardon my French! So, no, I am not an “extremist” by any stretch. If you want “extremism”, then look no further than the current day Jewish-run political establishment in the west!

Why Won’t I accept Jews, Moslems, Blacks And Other Assorted Mixed-Breeds?

Pretty simple folks – the answer here is that these people (non-whites in general) are trouble makers. People don’t like to hear it, but it’s true and it needs to be said. Follow the historical path of civilization and observe the pattern: White Aryans create the civilization and it flourishes. Then the Jews worm their way in and corrupt everything. Next, they start bringing in other non-whites as slave labour. Finally, we are left with a racially mixed decaying civilization. Hitler explains this in Mein Kampf and it’s true, whether fashionable to say so or not! (it will be fashionable a few years down the track, trust me!) So when I am presented with the options of a White racially pure society or a racially mixed, Jew and negro loving society, which one do you think I’d choose?

Remember - one doesn't exist without the other.

Remember – one doesn’t exist without the other.

Do I Have An Irrational Hatred Of Non-Whites?

Absolutely not. I have never been that sort of person. What I do have though, is a perfectly rational hatred for a lot of these people, not because I’m some sort of horrible monster, but because their actions warrant it! They have throughout history caused the downfall of my race’s civilizations, yet I’m supposed to love them all and welcome them in with open arms? People always talk about “learning from history” and if they were serious about it they’d pay attention to my reasoning above.

I Just Can’t Be Bothered With All The Bullshit That Comes Along With A Multicultural (Multiracial) Society

Racial Nationalism is natural. A race or breed should have it’s own territory. You respect the boundaries of your lands, and others should do the same with theirs. If not, you crush the wrong-doer. It’s that simple (in theory anyway).

Multicultural (multiracial) societies run by Jews always turn into Marxist cesspits of competing ethnic groups. This is no good because what it means is the most productive group (Whites) must carry all the useless groups (mostly non-Whites) via taxation and the welfare system until we can’t support it any longer and the society crumbles. Why would I want that?

Anyway, I don’t have any particular feelings of ill-will toward the other races. They can go and do whatever they feel like in their own lands, but not in mine! I just don’t want to live with them or have anything to do with them! Why is that so hard for people to understand?

Feelings About Fags

Faggotry is outside the boundaries of any healthy White Christian society. I do not want their disgusting degeneracy to have any place in my society. I do not uphold the Jewish idea of “freedom” which means anyone anywhere can just do whatever they want, including the dick up bum hole act. This sort of degeneracy all fuels the fire which destroys White society, and that is why I oppose it! A society must have standards if it is to survive!

More About Feelings

I just don’t care about the plight of non-whites. Be they Jews, Arabs, Negroes, Asiatics, or some other exotic mixture, I just don’t care. Never have, never will. I always think “well why would you involve yourself in someone else’s problems?” No, that’s for them in Arab-land or negro-land to figure out. It’s not my business, I don’t care, so they can go cry to someone else about their “oppression”. I won’t bother them if they don’t bother me. It’s pretty simple.

Finally…..

Just to reinforce the point:

I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality. The best example we have is what we saw in National Socialist Germany:

NSChristianAlter

None of this stuff is hard to understand, nor is it overly complex.

– BDL1983

A Germanic Analysis of A Streetcar Named Desire: The Plantation “Melting Pot Mentality”, The Politicization of Poon, and Covert Communism Masked As Capitalism

Here is an article sent to me by a “Viking stranded in the USA”:

Introduction

I used to run another blog that explored the dynamics of the Plantation USA and its relationship with Dispersed Europeans, specifically Germanics.  A few years back, I came to the realization that Germanics worldwide have been targeted by the New World Order for genocide. I came to this realization after seeing time and time again how “white” victims of violent crime in the USA were fair-haired, Germanic in visage.

The Genocide of Germanics is worldwide and its engineering is to be found in Plantation USA; however, the roots of the engineering of this worldwide Genocide of Germanics began in Europe.

The Politicization of Poon in the Kwa (USA), Its Napoleonic Roots, & Covert Communism Via the Covenant of Mixed Race Marriage

As an American, I have been purposely isolated via our education system from understanding my European roots. The American government has always purposely distanced its citizens from their tribes in Europe, but as it stands for Dispersed Europeans today in the colonies, this distancing needs to be bridged.

Most Americans do not mean to be ignorant, they just are.  Many do not recognize the brainwashing to which they have been subjected. As I was born in Canada and had a Northern European father, a Dutchman, I was able to separate myself from the Plantation and see through the bullshit.

Being of “mixed race” has been elevated here in the states by the Jew-run media. This mixed race, melting pot adulation here has its roots in the Napoleonic Civil codes that were enacted in France at the conclusion of the French Revolution. These codes with regards to marriage I see as the way of normalizing race mixing as the husband could go ahead and screw outside of the marriage as long as he never brought the woman home with him and as long as he never acknowledged his mulatto offspring; however, the wife was not afforded the same “freedom”.

Napoleonic Civil Codes with regards to marriage also implanted the idea that marriage = the unification of resources, or “what’s yours is mine” and this idea will be explored in my brief analysis of A Streetcar Named Desire.

I see Napoleonic marriage codes as the pathway to which Jews were able to re-enter European life at that time socially and materially. One has got to wonder if Napoleon had some Jewish heritage in him as his stature and looks would suggest.

Napoleon freed the Jews, who were then able to go and intermarry with the French Europeans and then latch on to European social and material capital, a sort of wealth distribution and a lower level covert communism. There is the belief that Judaism goes through the Mother, and this belief is held by Catholics as well, YET, the woman must take the husband’s last name, indicating that her children are of HIS bloodline and are his property. Consequently, you had numbers of Jewish men looking to bed and marry Shiksas so as to usurp genetic and material capital.

Northern Europe did not want the Napoleonic codes and did not want this New Europe and this resistance set the stage for the World Wars to come.

Napoleonic Civil Codes then extended to Haiti, Quebec, Canada; and Louisiana, USA. New Orleans is the epicenter of race mixing in the USA and it was known for its mixed race prostitutes and mistresses. Haiti had a revolution that ended with African males taking French European women for their wives. Quebec is a clusterfuck that saps many Anglican Canadians of their taxes and many up there wish it would secede, but I digress….

The Napoleonic codes served a number of purposes for today’s NWO:

  • Set the stage for the European Union
  • Covertly promoted mixed race marriages that involve the transferring of social, genetic, and material capital from Europeans to Non Europeans, who were African or Jews.
  • Cloaked Communism as “Crapitalism” via “freedom”, meaning one could screw, procreate with, and/or marry someone outside of his or her race with no genetic and/or material consequence, which many men and women today with tribal sense are recognizing today is NOT the case.

A Streetcar Named Desire

streetcar

The movie is set in Mystery Meat Mecca New Orleans. The main characters are Blanche (played by Vivian Leigh), Stella who is Blanche’s sister, and Stanley (played by Marlon Brando).

Stella and Stanley live in a small apartment in a loud and rowdy, racially mixed New Orleans.  Stanley is a Pollock, but really, for all intent, his character could be an African or Jew, but I believe his character was crafted as Eastern European to be more palatable for the audiences at that time. **Interesting how Mediterranean Brando was well-suited for this role.

Stanley’s wife, Stella, who hails from the Old South Anglican plantation lineage, finds excitement with Stanley. He “turns the lights on” for her so to speak.

streetcar2

Enter Blanche, Stella’s sister, who still seems to be stuck in a post-traumatized fugue.  ***Interesting how Vivian Leigh, the English actress who played Scarlett O’Hara in Gone With The Wind, plays this character. Her name means “white” or “blanco”. She visits the couple because she really has nowhere to go and she has with her paperwork showing that there is nothing left to the family estate.

She is unmarried and claims to be virginal despite having been with men. Physically she is not a virgin, but psychologically, psychically, and materially she is virginal as these men “have taken nothing from her”. Aside: The true meaning of virgin means unmarried woman.

Stella represents the ideal woman of the New Jew World Order. She is Germanic yet has race mixed by marrying Stanley and has given herself and her social capitol away to the gruff Stanley Kowalski, who by today’s standards, could be an African, Muzzie, or Jew.

Stanley is the Mystery Meat Man of the New World Order. He is the usurper of resources via Napoleonic Marriage and he is without couth about it. He takes what he wants, fucks who he wants, and he earns his keep off the backs of women. His view of marriage is what he can get materially, genetically, and socially from his woman. He is a tyrant who rules and thinks with his dick in place of his mind.

Blanche is the antithesis of the Jew World Order as she resists marriage with Mystery Meat Men and still holds on to her Old World Identity. Despite having been with men and despite having lost money and property, she maintains her distinction, her separateness, her Anglican and really Germanic identity. Nothing can be taken from her. She is traumatized yet free.

There is tension throughout the story. Stanley recognizes that even though he married Stella, Blanche’s sister with the possible hopes of gaining some resources, well, that “shite” is just not happening. The estate is gone as Blanche relays to Stanley and Stella during her visit, due to her male relatives’ philandering (with Mystery Meat Mamas?).

Without going through the whole story, towards the end, Blanche is raped by Stanley, who to me personifies the Jew World Order ravishing and ravaging the social and material capitol of the Old Germanic Empire, personified by Blanche. Stanley has also uncovered some gossip concerning Blanche’s past in Mississippi. He defiles her not only by rape, but by spreading gossip about her, such as her supposed dalliance with a student of hers –Blanche was previously an English teacher. There are also stories circulating that Blanche cavorted with prostitutes as she lived in a hotel for awhile.

Stanley “witchifies” Blanche in an effort to discredit her not unlike how the Jew-run media witchifies white women today.

In the weeks that follow the rape, Blanche is still in a traumatic fugue. He exerts his power over her brutally, but in the end, he pays karmically, as his own Anglican wife, Blanche’s sister Stella, leaves him. Before she leaves, they argue and he mentions how they are in a “Napoleonic marriage” and that “what is yours is mine”.

The Melting Pot’s Resisters: Amerikwa & Europe Today:

Tennessee Williams wrote the play A Streetcar Named Desire in 1947. It is interesting how the themes from a racial consciousness lens in that story are still alive and play out today. The media, primarily run by Jews, is picking up in intensity with regards to its “politicization of poon” and its promotion of race mixing, yet there are scores of women who have resisted. These women may be single mothers, divorcees, and mothers who have chosen to go the sperm donor route because they did not meet their mate. These women are often “witchified” by the media in an effort to isolate them and abuse them, when in fact, they are not defective, but the Jew World Order is defective as it views them as genetic chattel to be defiled.

The same thing can be said of European men who have a sense of ethnic identity. They have been isolated and in a sense, emasculated. Despite the brainwashing by porn that defiles Germanic looking women and that promotes the Mystery Meat mash, there are scores of Dispersed European men who have resisted.

The EU is crumbling and both the USA and Europe are fragmented and being invaded by hostile hordes from the Carribean, Mexico, Asia, Africa, and Asia. Despite these invasions, the Northern European and/or Germanic spirit still lives as pockets of resistance spring up throughout Scandanavia, England, and Germany. The USA is a wildcard in comparison because who knows how things will turn out here, yet underneath, tremors are felt.

There are many Blanches through the USA and Europe that have resisted the Stanleys. They may be tired and worn, but it is their resistance that will model how their sisters AND brothers can escape the hands of their Judaic Handlers and the clutches of the New World Order.

It is only a matter of time.

– Viking Stranded in the USA

Thanks for the article Viking!

PS – Original article contributions will be considered for publishing provided they are decent, thought provoking, and relevant. This helps me give the site a more regular output of material. If you have something original or a link to an article worth re-posting, then drop the link in a comment section. If it’s an original then say so, and I’ll contact you via email!

Cheers!

– BDL1983