Category Archives: Communism

Axe-Wielding Afghan Goes On Rampage On German Train

Surprise, surprise. Here we go again….

Blood everywhere inside the train.

Blood everywhere inside the train.

From Fox News:

Multiple people were injured after a teenage Afghan refugee went on a slashing spree armed with an axe and knife on a train in southern Germany on Monday night before he was shot to death by police, officials said.

Wuerzburg police said on their Facebook page that three of the victims suffered serious injuries and one was slightly injured. Another 14 people were being treated for shock.

Bavaria’s top security official, state Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann, told Germany’s ARD television that the attacker had been identified as a 17-year-old Afghan refugee.

Herrmann said initial information was that the suspect came to Germany as an unaccompanied minor and had lived in the Wuerzburg area for some time, initially at a refugee facility in the town of Ochsenfurt and more recently with a foster family.

Read More

For fuck’s sake, this shit is just getting crazy. If people can’t work out why fucking shit-skin Afghans don’t belong in Germany, then they are idiots. German people do not do this sort of thing. However, an “axe-wielding slashing rampage” is just the sort of thing you’d expect from a fucking useless arab, and it’s exactly what’s happened here.

My blood boils every time I hear the latest thing the shit-skins have been up to in Europe. These people are fucking scum and White folks better damn well get that through their thick heads, and quickly! If not, then this shit-skin behaviour is just going to happen more and more often until Western Civilization is no more. The rate we’re going we should all look into candle manufacturing as a business opportunity. It may well be the west’s number one industry in the future given the number of fucking vigils the weaklings like having.

– BDL1983

Today’s Society Is Pathetic

We’re all used to it now. Every second day it seems there is another terrorist attack of some sort. Whether it’s a genuine Moslem attack or a Mossad operation is beside the point. The overall reaction of society toward being attacked is retarded and it’s the same over and over again.

Who gives a fuck whether you're afraid or not?

Who gives a fuck whether you’re afraid or not?

I just don’t get it. Do these candle-lit vigil attendees and “Not Afraid” card holders actually think what they are doing is going to make one iota of difference to the crazed perpetrators of “terror“? As you are being blown up the last thing of any relevance is your emotional state! Saying that you are not afraid and burning candles in order to prevent further attacks is without doubt the most stupid response imaginable. It boggles the mind.

What also boggles the mind is the typical complete lack of anger in people. When you’re attacked isn’t it a natural instinct to seek out and deal with the attackers? Well, where the hell is the general anger at the attackers and their associated religion/ideology. Why is there no will to do anything about it? The lack of anger is remarkable, to say the least.

If you have a problem the first thing you do is try to identify the cause. Once the cause is known, you then try and get rid of it so you can be problem-free, right? Well, let’s just take the usual mainstream narrative of the “terrorist attack” – Moslem goes to crowded place, blows a bunch of people up or shoots them or runs them over (new one) or whatever, and that’s about it. Now, considering this same narrative has occurred over and over again and the attacks just keep coming, wouldn’t a logically minded person (or nation) want to root out the cause so the attacks stop? I mean, call me crazy, but is that not a fair way of analysing the scenario? All it takes is some brainy-act to sit down and go, “hmmm, there seems to be a pattern here and a certain underlying cause…” In this scenario it’s “Moslems come to country, blow people up”. Wasn’t happening before they started coming, but it is now, therefore they are the underlying cause. To fix the problem Moslems must be removed or it’ll just keep happening. It’s not rocket science and if the authorities were genuinely concerned about the “terror” problem, then this would be the first measure taken. That is simple logic.

Instead of using logic though, the reality is like this:

“Well, it’s not all Moslems” – Of course not all Moslems have committed acts of “terror”. If they had then the whole planet would be blown to fuck already! Accepting them into your country is akin to eating apples with the knowledge that 1 in 50 is poisoned. It’s not a bright idea is it?

“We should stand in ‘solidarity’ with Moslems because they’re the real victims” – What the fuck kind of logic is that? If they’re the ones doing the blowing up, then they are the perpetrators. The victims are the ones that got blown up. People are fucking dopes if they can’t work that out (and they cant).

So when you add together all this fucking ‘solidarity’ crap and multikulti at all costs, basically you have a recipe for disaster. If you are going to stand side by side with your racial enemies and invite them in to live with you, then what the fuck? You can’t expect things to turn out well.

Moslems (1)

Trying to live in ‘solidarity’ with people like this isn’t a good idea.

Anyone with eyes should be able to tell that Moslems are never going to be any fun to live with. Why would you want them in the first place? They’re all nothing but trouble. Mark my words.

– BDL1983

French Insanity Update

Thank you Andrew for saying it and saving me the trouble:

valls

Regarding the “totally unpredictable” French terror attacks:

Hollande came out with some stupid talk following the attacks. Something about how France is stronger than the terrorists – a statement which has no meaning.

Other world leaders came out with various stupid, meaningless statements along these same lines of “we shall prevail.”

Read More

It’s all akin to “we’re going to fix it with candle-lit vigils” basically. Well, good luck with that you fucking do-gooder dickheads!!

– BDL1983

Aussie Election Day Tomorrow…

Tomorrow is the once every three years event where we get to head to the polls and make our votes count…..

Bob Dole or CLIN-TON?

Bob Dole or CLIN-TON? Either way, they’ll exchange long protein strands in private!

…… Well, that’s what they’d like us to think anyway. Of course, voting makes no difference when essentially your choices are Tweedledee or Tweedledum.

So, just to get the political passions flowing, let’s examine (mock) the two characters, one of whom will be the Prime Minister after tomorrows proceedings. My bet is on the “same old same old”, I.e. no change in PM, but only time will tell (bite nails with anticipation)!

First up we have this person:

Current PM Malcolm Turnbull - looks trustworthy...

Current PM Malcolm Turnbull – Looks trustworthy…

I’m quite sure he will win tomorrows election. Not because he’s anything great, but because his opposition is even more fundamentally unappealing, which we’ll get to in a second. If you’re Australian you are probably familiar with him minus the Jew hat, up there smiling at the TV camera and speaking in a Prime-Ministerial way. If you compare how Turnbull comes across compared to Tony Abbott, then you will see why they got rid of Abbott. He was all ‘ummmms and aaaaaahs’ stuttering around trying to put a sentence together. Turnbull can at least form sentences and he’s very good friends with the Jewish community, being one himself!

Now to the opposition.

This is Malcolm’s rival:

Labor leader Bill Shorten - Also very trustworthy....

Labor leader Bill Shorten – Also very trustworthy….

The thing about Bill Shorten is that he doesn’t look the part for Prime Minister, despite the signage behind him in that picture. He comes across as a small weaselly type of man, and although he can speak, he doesn’t have the ability to make himself seem like someone capable of leadership. This is why he will lose the election.

Apart from the above, he is of course (like all Labor politicians) an ex-unionist, which means essentially a communist or not far off. These types are all the same and I hate them all.

Another thing Bill has working against him is that he has a very funny shaped head. This picture helps illuminate:

AlienBill

Alien Bill.

Although it’s obviously a digitally altered image, Bill Shorten doesn’t look a bit out of place in Star Trek garb. The top of his head is so large that if he were painted light green he could easily audition for an acting role as an alien. I suspect he is part-alien, part-man, and is on a mission to deceive us all!

He also reminds me of these two:

Kodos and Kang.

Kodos and Kang.

“You won’t win, so return to your home planet Bill. Let the earthlings live freely” – election message from Kodos.

Who’ll it be? Jew Malcolm or Commie Bill? The choice is agonizing.

Happy voting tomorrow Australia!

– BDL1983

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – Straight Cucked!

Here’s an article written by a mate of mine from the Australia First Party.

Pen Name: Mr Happy Pantß – Hahaha…..

What does the term “cucked” mean?”

You might say:

A new-found adjective, deriving from the term ‘cuckold’, popularised in the US as a weapon to cut the legs from underneath neo-cons who put the interests of foreigners before their own fellow countrymen.

Originally an S&M term for a white male who watches on as a black male has it on with his wife – coming from the practice of the cuckoo bird, which will eat another birds eggs & lay it’s own in their place, leaving the unsuspecting parent to rear it’s young, thereby ‘cuckolding’ that parent bird.

This then also becomes a tag for those who would literally take on offspring from outside races into their family (or by extension: into their nation) & treat them as their own, literally.

The One Nation Party fits these pyjamas snug like a pair of bike pants – a so-called “Nationalist” party, who go out of their way to stress that “Australia is multiracial”, even more so than the bloody mainstream parties!

I’ve already confronted Pauline on her absolutely cucked policy on multiculturalism & she went on to point out that Yugoslavians, Ukrainians, Italians and Greeks all “assimilated” well to Australian culture, so therefore we must excuse non-white immigration into Australia provided they all assimilate, of course…

Pauline-Hanson-goes-Cuckservative

Recalling this conversation reminds me of the infamous “Brangelina” Cucks!

Pathological altruism gone mad

Pathological altruism gone mad

I tagged along to a small meeting chaired by Pauline’s SA candidate Steve Burgess, just for a sticky-beak. He opened the meeting, not with a welcome, but with, “Australia is a multiracial society. Everybody agree…?” As if that hadn’t made me sick enough, he was met with a unanimous, resounding “Yes” from the 16 or so around the table.

Discussing this with Steve the same day I confronted Pauline, he also defended Asian immigrant “Australians” saying, “they work hard…” Bit of a stark contrast to Pauline’s ’98 rhetoric about “defending Australia from the Asian invasion”. But hey, she’s cleared that up – we all just got the wrong idea after the media fabricated footage of her literally saying “Australia is being swamped by Asians”.

sketch-1465250237448

Steve loves his new boat kids more than his old kids. They assimilate very well!

A wander into Steve’s page on the One Nation website brought no surprises. Steve fights for Australians. Well that’s good. But unfortunately, his definition of the term Australian, just like Pauline’s, is straight out of the greens play-book.

IMG_20160607_214940

Come here, work & we couldn’t care less who you are. We’ll even fight for your rights!

Looking at One Nation’s policy on multiculturalism, one has to wonder how this garbage can be palatable to any of Pauline’s followers. The conclusion is then reached that they obviously haven’t read it. It states that, while being FOR Multi-racialism, they will “abolish multiculturalism & promote assimilation & NATIONALISM to the non-white hordes.”(!!!) Right……

Yep, gonna teach this lot some "Australian Nationalism" - then sit back while they assimilate.

Yep, gonna teach this lot some “Australian Nationalism” – then sit back while they ASSIMILATE?!

It’s also interesting to note the amount of friendly publicity Pauline’s been receiving the last month or so, compared to the sort of publicity genuine nationalists receive. More to the point, compared to the negative publicity Pauline received back in ’98.

pauline-and-demi

Pauline's had to do a lot of virtue signalling to regain status as a mainstream politician

Pauline’s had to do a lot of virtue signalling to regain status as a mainstream politician.

She’s definitely managed to turn things around in the media, which leads many of us to certain conclusions. In fact, she’s turned her whole ideology around!

One Nation's new ideal - the assimilated "Australian" family

One Nation’s new ideal – the assimilated “Australian” family.

And thus, one question this author would like to put to Pauline & crew is this: how much of One Nation’s funding has come from sources tied to the Liberal Party &/or JEWISH sources?

Given that her policies are now perfectly in line with the single issue anti-Islamist groups like Reclaim Australia and Australian Liberty Alliance, it is fair to assume she is another sell-out, just like all the other “Kosher conservatives.” The anti-Islam stuff and pro-multicultural rhetoric used by One Nation and these fake groups is only there to serve Israeli war interests in the mid-east and the Jewish led agenda to destroy Australia’s White identity.

Source Article

– Mr Happy Pantß

Love & Hate…. AGAIN!

Remember - one doesn't exist without the other.

Remember – one doesn’t exist without the other.

The thing about us allegedly being driven by hate never stops coming up. According to the leftist Jew-loving communist types, people of our political persuasion are just about the only people on the planet who’ve ever hated anything. Without us the world would be one big happy love-fest, arms linked around a camp fire singing ‘Kumbaya’….. Yeah right.

Well, in multicultural tolerance land this happens all the time. Why don't you White Supremacists get on board?

Well, in “multicultural tolerance land” this happens all the time. Why don’t you White Supremacists get on board?

So why mention all this again? Because if you have a look at the faces in this article it is clear which side of the political divide is driven by hatred. It is definitely not our side, and I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone who’d claim to be driven by hatred. The hatred I encounter all the time from our side is a perfectly rational one. Since the Jews and commie bastards want to destroy our race, which we love (sometimes I don’t know why), then it follows that you will hate them for wanting to do that!

We would never have to explain such simple concepts as ‘opposing emotions’ if humans weren’t such a dim-witted species. Unfortunately, humans ARE dim-witted for the most part, so here we go again:

Everything is explained in this old article which I may as well re-post in its entirety:

The Thing About Love And Hate.

We often hear a lot in this ‘movement’ about there being too much hate. People often complain about hate as if it is somehow an irrational, unnecessary emotion for humans to feel toward someone or something. Well, the truth of the matter is that if hate were an unnecessary part of the human make-up, then we would have been born with an innate inability to feel hate. Anyone who is honest and has more than half a brain knows that they hate certain things in life – everyone does. There’s nothing wrong with feeling hate. It’s natural, normal and healthy.

Love and hate are polar opposites emotionally. This is a simple fact of nature, like how good and evil are also polar opposites. This is where the cunning Jew likes to confuse matters. The Jew knows very well that 99% of well-intentioned people like the sound of “love and good” far more than they like the sound of “hate and evil”. So, being the eternal deceiver and liar that he is, he tricks people’s minds into believing that ‘hate’ = ‘evil’, and ‘love’ = ‘good’. It is a cunning deception as usual, but it can be easily exposed for the deception it is by highlighting the fact that if hate equals evil, and love equals good, then why would we need different words to express the exact same emotion? Hate is not necessarily evil, nor is love necessarily good – this is what the Jew doesn’t want anyone to think about rationally and it’s also why they put so much effort into ‘combating hate’ and crap like that. The purpose of their campaign against ‘hate’ is to turn whatever it is that someone doesn’t like into a psychological disorder then get “Dr. Rosenblum” to prescribe Jew psychiatric pharmaceuticals to cure the ‘hater’!

A couple simple case examples:

If someone came to your house, murdered your family and stole a bunch of things, would you hate them? Of course you would! The ‘hate’ in this case is a healthy force for good! If you loved this person you’d be a mental patient.

If someone helped you through some personal problems, let you use their car, and gave you some financial help, would you love and appreciate them? Of course you would! The ‘love’ in this case is a wholesome healthy emotion! If you hated this person you’d be a mental patient once again!

I rest my case.

The main reason I think they are so fixated on eliminating ‘hate’ is because Jews know that Jewish behaviour is so fundamentally unlikeable to anyone of any race, that portraying the ‘hater’ as a social outcast or a psychopath is the only tactic they can use to convince the rest of society that “this is where ‘hating’ gets you”. The Jews know damn well that when the inevitable backlash against them comes, they want a world with as few ‘haters’ as possible – haters of them, that is. Funny how the Jew doesn’t care about any communist or left-wing hate which is very, very often directed toward us, and blatantly so. Once again the Jew is exposed for the hypocritical liar that he is!

This is how ‘love and hate’ works through my eyes:

We, on the National Socialist truthful-side-of-politics stand for and love our own race (despite their current problematic state). This comes from our innate healthy instincts which tell us to do so. These instincts are strong and can’t be over-ridden. It follows logically from here that since we are telling the truth about our love for our race, then we would also hate anything and everything which poses a threat to our racial well-being and survival. That’s just common sense from my perspective.

They, on the Jewish/Communist/Left-Wing side of politics hate our White race. They seek our destruction because as an infinitely more capable race than any other, we shatter their stupid and utterly wrongful delusions of racial equality and multiculturalism. We are the only real threat to the Jewish plan for world domination and the Communists idea of everyone being equal. Clearly they are the psychopathic side of this argument, since all of their ideas are not based on reality or nature, but on delusion! The only love felt on this side of the political fence is self-love and the love of their own unrestrained egoism. This is because they have nothing worth loving, no true ideals, and are either Jews or disaffected, detached individuals with no capacity for truly caring about the most important thing everyone has right in front of them – their own genetic race – their own bloodline!

The Jews (and their lackeys) hate us because our race is an obstacle to them achieving their agenda. There is no other reason for their hatred of us; for they know very well that we have not persecuted them. We have always been provoked by them and eventually got fed up with their behaviour and given them the boot!

We hate the Jews because of what they do. If they didn’t constantly work toward our racial destruction and just left us alone and went and lived among themselves somewhere else, then we would never have had a problem with them! It’s that simple.

Finally, to any of our Jewish friends or communist lackeys reading this – here’s something to bear in mind:

When the White man with racial love and pride in his heart finally gets furious, you’ll find out that your hatred is nothing compared to ours, for you have no true love. We do, and it gives us infinite strength to crush our enemies with!

This quote from George Lincoln Rockwell sums the situation up nicely:

Without a deadly hatred of that which threatens what we love, love is an empty catchword for hippies, queers, and cowards…

Also very relevant reading: Why I Stand For What I Stand For!

– BDL1983

Australia First Party Protests Harvey Norman Over Their Hiring Policy

Our protest on Saturday. Note "RAPEfugees" on the banner. That was good!

Our protest on Saturday at Harvey Norman Gepps Cross.

Billionaire Gerry Harvey decided recently that he’d prefer to offer jobs in his Harvey Norman electrical appliance store chain to none other than 12,000 Syrian RAPEfugees, rather than give some jobless Australians a chance. What a low-life scumbag selling his own struggling countrymen up shit creek! We thought we’d give him a piece of our mind so we stood out there with our signs, passed out a few leaflets etc, for about 45 minutes or so. I know it’s only a small thing to do, but at least we did something to try and get the right message out there in the real world!

The public response was 80-90% positive I’d say, apart from a couple disinterested ethnic sorts, which is to be expected, and a couple of disgruntled granny’s who were too crazy to care what anyone’s got to say anymore regardless! Store management wasn’t overly thrilled to see us there, but they didn’t care too much provided we didn’t harass the customers. We just agreed with management since we weren’t harassing them anyway, and carried on as before. And that was it, pretty much. Then we had a few beers afterwards.

Sydney Protest November Last Year:

HardlyNormalsProtestSydney

AustFirst

– BDL1983

Why I Stand For What I Stand For!

Adolf Hitler - we need another one!

Adolf Hitler – we need another one!

I’m going to explain a few things here in relatively simple terms, so anyone who is confused or wondering what motivates me can refer to this article.

What Sort Of Society Do I Want To Live In?

I want to live in a society among my own kind, meaning my own race. I do not want to live among those of other races because they are not of my blood and do not share a common world view and basic morality with my race – the White Aryan race. Different breeds (races) of humans are different, and for that reason alone it should make sense to anyone with a thinking brain to keep them separate. Now, despite the fact that there are plenty of arsehole Whites around the place, I’d still a million times over prefer to live with them than non-whites. As for all the Whites who’s natural sense of morality has been led astray, well they need to be re-educated to adhere to proper Christian principles.

Essentially I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality, similar to what we saw in National Socialist Germany. There’s nothing devious or tricky about any of this. It is what it is.

Am I an “Extremist”?

It is not “extreme” to want to live in a White nation with Christian morality. It is a perfectly rational desire for any White person who wants their race and themselves to have a decent future. What is extreme though, is this Jewish agenda to try and force all the non-whites and their foreign belief systems into any White living space, anywhere on earth! That is fucking nuts, pardon my French! So, no, I am not an “extremist” by any stretch. If you want “extremism”, then look no further than the current day Jewish-run political establishment in the west!

Why Won’t I accept Jews, Moslems, Blacks And Other Assorted Mixed-Breeds?

Pretty simple folks – the answer here is that these people (non-whites in general) are trouble makers. People don’t like to hear it, but it’s true and it needs to be said. Follow the historical path of civilization and observe the pattern: White Aryans create the civilization and it flourishes. Then the Jews worm their way in and corrupt everything. Next, they start bringing in other non-whites as slave labour. Finally, we are left with a racially mixed decaying civilization. Hitler explains this in Mein Kampf and it’s true, whether fashionable to say so or not! (it will be fashionable a few years down the track, trust me!) So when I am presented with the options of a White racially pure society or a racially mixed, Jew and negro loving society, which one do you think I’d choose?

Remember - one doesn't exist without the other.

Remember – one doesn’t exist without the other.

Do I Have An Irrational Hatred Of Non-Whites?

Absolutely not. I have never been that sort of person. What I do have though, is a perfectly rational hatred for a lot of these people, not because I’m some sort of horrible monster, but because their actions warrant it! They have throughout history caused the downfall of my race’s civilizations, yet I’m supposed to love them all and welcome them in with open arms? People always talk about “learning from history” and if they were serious about it they’d pay attention to my reasoning above.

I Just Can’t Be Bothered With All The Bullshit That Comes Along With A Multicultural (Multiracial) Society

Racial Nationalism is natural. A race or breed should have it’s own territory. You respect the boundaries of your lands, and others should do the same with theirs. If not, you crush the wrong-doer. It’s that simple (in theory anyway).

Multicultural (multiracial) societies run by Jews always turn into Marxist cesspits of competing ethnic groups. This is no good because what it means is the most productive group (Whites) must carry all the useless groups (mostly non-Whites) via taxation and the welfare system until we can’t support it any longer and the society crumbles. Why would I want that?

Anyway, I don’t have any particular feelings of ill-will toward the other races. They can go and do whatever they feel like in their own lands, but not in mine! I just don’t want to live with them or have anything to do with them! Why is that so hard for people to understand?

Feelings About Fags

Faggotry is outside the boundaries of any healthy White Christian society. I do not want their disgusting degeneracy to have any place in my society. I do not uphold the Jewish idea of “freedom” which means anyone anywhere can just do whatever they want, including the dick up bum hole act. This sort of degeneracy all fuels the fire which destroys White society, and that is why I oppose it! A society must have standards if it is to survive!

More About Feelings

I just don’t care about the plight of non-whites. Be they Jews, Arabs, Negroes, Asiatics, or some other exotic mixture, I just don’t care. Never have, never will. I always think “well why would you involve yourself in someone else’s problems?” No, that’s for them in Arab-land or negro-land to figure out. It’s not my business, I don’t care, so they can go cry to someone else about their “oppression”. I won’t bother them if they don’t bother me. It’s pretty simple.

Finally…..

Just to reinforce the point:

I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality. The best example we have is what we saw in National Socialist Germany:

NSChristianAlter

None of this stuff is hard to understand, nor is it overly complex.

– BDL1983

A Germanic Analysis of A Streetcar Named Desire: The Plantation “Melting Pot Mentality”, The Politicization of Poon, and Covert Communism Masked As Capitalism

Here is an article sent to me by a “Viking stranded in the USA”:

Introduction

I used to run another blog that explored the dynamics of the Plantation USA and its relationship with Dispersed Europeans, specifically Germanics.  A few years back, I came to the realization that Germanics worldwide have been targeted by the New World Order for genocide. I came to this realization after seeing time and time again how “white” victims of violent crime in the USA were fair-haired, Germanic in visage.

The Genocide of Germanics is worldwide and its engineering is to be found in Plantation USA; however, the roots of the engineering of this worldwide Genocide of Germanics began in Europe.

The Politicization of Poon in the Kwa (USA), Its Napoleonic Roots, & Covert Communism Via the Covenant of Mixed Race Marriage

As an American, I have been purposely isolated via our education system from understanding my European roots. The American government has always purposely distanced its citizens from their tribes in Europe, but as it stands for Dispersed Europeans today in the colonies, this distancing needs to be bridged.

Most Americans do not mean to be ignorant, they just are.  Many do not recognize the brainwashing to which they have been subjected. As I was born in Canada and had a Northern European father, a Dutchman, I was able to separate myself from the Plantation and see through the bullshit.

Being of “mixed race” has been elevated here in the states by the Jew-run media. This mixed race, melting pot adulation here has its roots in the Napoleonic Civil codes that were enacted in France at the conclusion of the French Revolution. These codes with regards to marriage I see as the way of normalizing race mixing as the husband could go ahead and screw outside of the marriage as long as he never brought the woman home with him and as long as he never acknowledged his mulatto offspring; however, the wife was not afforded the same “freedom”.

Napoleonic Civil Codes with regards to marriage also implanted the idea that marriage = the unification of resources, or “what’s yours is mine” and this idea will be explored in my brief analysis of A Streetcar Named Desire.

I see Napoleonic marriage codes as the pathway to which Jews were able to re-enter European life at that time socially and materially. One has got to wonder if Napoleon had some Jewish heritage in him as his stature and looks would suggest.

Napoleon freed the Jews, who were then able to go and intermarry with the French Europeans and then latch on to European social and material capital, a sort of wealth distribution and a lower level covert communism. There is the belief that Judaism goes through the Mother, and this belief is held by Catholics as well, YET, the woman must take the husband’s last name, indicating that her children are of HIS bloodline and are his property. Consequently, you had numbers of Jewish men looking to bed and marry Shiksas so as to usurp genetic and material capital.

Northern Europe did not want the Napoleonic codes and did not want this New Europe and this resistance set the stage for the World Wars to come.

Napoleonic Civil Codes then extended to Haiti, Quebec, Canada; and Louisiana, USA. New Orleans is the epicenter of race mixing in the USA and it was known for its mixed race prostitutes and mistresses. Haiti had a revolution that ended with African males taking French European women for their wives. Quebec is a clusterfuck that saps many Anglican Canadians of their taxes and many up there wish it would secede, but I digress….

The Napoleonic codes served a number of purposes for today’s NWO:

  • Set the stage for the European Union
  • Covertly promoted mixed race marriages that involve the transferring of social, genetic, and material capital from Europeans to Non Europeans, who were African or Jews.
  • Cloaked Communism as “Crapitalism” via “freedom”, meaning one could screw, procreate with, and/or marry someone outside of his or her race with no genetic and/or material consequence, which many men and women today with tribal sense are recognizing today is NOT the case.

A Streetcar Named Desire

streetcar

The movie is set in Mystery Meat Mecca New Orleans. The main characters are Blanche (played by Vivian Leigh), Stella who is Blanche’s sister, and Stanley (played by Marlon Brando).

Stella and Stanley live in a small apartment in a loud and rowdy, racially mixed New Orleans.  Stanley is a Pollock, but really, for all intent, his character could be an African or Jew, but I believe his character was crafted as Eastern European to be more palatable for the audiences at that time. **Interesting how Mediterranean Brando was well-suited for this role.

Stanley’s wife, Stella, who hails from the Old South Anglican plantation lineage, finds excitement with Stanley. He “turns the lights on” for her so to speak.

streetcar2

Enter Blanche, Stella’s sister, who still seems to be stuck in a post-traumatized fugue.  ***Interesting how Vivian Leigh, the English actress who played Scarlett O’Hara in Gone With The Wind, plays this character. Her name means “white” or “blanco”. She visits the couple because she really has nowhere to go and she has with her paperwork showing that there is nothing left to the family estate.

She is unmarried and claims to be virginal despite having been with men. Physically she is not a virgin, but psychologically, psychically, and materially she is virginal as these men “have taken nothing from her”. Aside: The true meaning of virgin means unmarried woman.

Stella represents the ideal woman of the New Jew World Order. She is Germanic yet has race mixed by marrying Stanley and has given herself and her social capitol away to the gruff Stanley Kowalski, who by today’s standards, could be an African, Muzzie, or Jew.

Stanley is the Mystery Meat Man of the New World Order. He is the usurper of resources via Napoleonic Marriage and he is without couth about it. He takes what he wants, fucks who he wants, and he earns his keep off the backs of women. His view of marriage is what he can get materially, genetically, and socially from his woman. He is a tyrant who rules and thinks with his dick in place of his mind.

Blanche is the antithesis of the Jew World Order as she resists marriage with Mystery Meat Men and still holds on to her Old World Identity. Despite having been with men and despite having lost money and property, she maintains her distinction, her separateness, her Anglican and really Germanic identity. Nothing can be taken from her. She is traumatized yet free.

There is tension throughout the story. Stanley recognizes that even though he married Stella, Blanche’s sister with the possible hopes of gaining some resources, well, that “shite” is just not happening. The estate is gone as Blanche relays to Stanley and Stella during her visit, due to her male relatives’ philandering (with Mystery Meat Mamas?).

Without going through the whole story, towards the end, Blanche is raped by Stanley, who to me personifies the Jew World Order ravishing and ravaging the social and material capitol of the Old Germanic Empire, personified by Blanche. Stanley has also uncovered some gossip concerning Blanche’s past in Mississippi. He defiles her not only by rape, but by spreading gossip about her, such as her supposed dalliance with a student of hers –Blanche was previously an English teacher. There are also stories circulating that Blanche cavorted with prostitutes as she lived in a hotel for awhile.

Stanley “witchifies” Blanche in an effort to discredit her not unlike how the Jew-run media witchifies white women today.

In the weeks that follow the rape, Blanche is still in a traumatic fugue. He exerts his power over her brutally, but in the end, he pays karmically, as his own Anglican wife, Blanche’s sister Stella, leaves him. Before she leaves, they argue and he mentions how they are in a “Napoleonic marriage” and that “what is yours is mine”.

The Melting Pot’s Resisters: Amerikwa & Europe Today:

Tennessee Williams wrote the play A Streetcar Named Desire in 1947. It is interesting how the themes from a racial consciousness lens in that story are still alive and play out today. The media, primarily run by Jews, is picking up in intensity with regards to its “politicization of poon” and its promotion of race mixing, yet there are scores of women who have resisted. These women may be single mothers, divorcees, and mothers who have chosen to go the sperm donor route because they did not meet their mate. These women are often “witchified” by the media in an effort to isolate them and abuse them, when in fact, they are not defective, but the Jew World Order is defective as it views them as genetic chattel to be defiled.

The same thing can be said of European men who have a sense of ethnic identity. They have been isolated and in a sense, emasculated. Despite the brainwashing by porn that defiles Germanic looking women and that promotes the Mystery Meat mash, there are scores of Dispersed European men who have resisted.

The EU is crumbling and both the USA and Europe are fragmented and being invaded by hostile hordes from the Carribean, Mexico, Asia, Africa, and Asia. Despite these invasions, the Northern European and/or Germanic spirit still lives as pockets of resistance spring up throughout Scandanavia, England, and Germany. The USA is a wildcard in comparison because who knows how things will turn out here, yet underneath, tremors are felt.

There are many Blanches through the USA and Europe that have resisted the Stanleys. They may be tired and worn, but it is their resistance that will model how their sisters AND brothers can escape the hands of their Judaic Handlers and the clutches of the New World Order.

It is only a matter of time.

– Viking Stranded in the USA

Thanks for the article Viking!

PS – Original article contributions will be considered for publishing provided they are decent, thought provoking, and relevant. This helps me give the site a more regular output of material. If you have something original or a link to an article worth re-posting, then drop the link in a comment section. If it’s an original then say so, and I’ll contact you via email!

Cheers!

– BDL1983

Strong Foundation = Strong Worldview

Iron Cross Swastika

Do People Even Have Worldviews?

The other day I was busy thinking about the worldviews people have, and whether what most people consider their own opinions even constitute worldviews? After careful consideration I decided that even the weak minded TV brainwashed types do have worldviews, it’s just that they don’t have any solid foundations for them. The Jew has worked his poison of moral relativism and the idea that because things in the world are ‘ever changing’, then your worldview should always be adjusting itself according to the changes. If something was deemed morally wrong in the past, the Jew says that this was just the fashion at the time and that it isn’t necessarily wrong now (sodomites are a great example). In using that sort of technique the Jews and their Marxist minions have continually chipped away at the now ‘thin wall’ of basic morality and solid principles which once upheld western civilization.

The Two Contrasting Types Of Worldview:

1.) The Rock Solid Worldview – The person with strong convictions is always going to lay down strong principles which will be the foundation of their worldview. Being one of these sorts of people, I know that my principles, which govern exactly how I think, cannot be bent. They do not change. And when your principles are correct it makes it impossible for anyone with a decent amount of common sense to argue with you.

2.) The Moral Relativist Worldview – Like I mentioned above, people with this sort of worldview shift and morph their views according to what suits the current moment in time. The vast majority of people fit into this category today because we are almost completely void of the solid Christian worldview (National Socialism is the best expression of it, by the way) which protected us against any variety of Jewish poison. I’ve also heard the moral relativist worldview referred to as the ‘fluid worldview‘, which sounds to me like a way of someone admitting they don’t really know why they think what they do, but nonetheless they do. Then down the track they’ll change their minds in direct correlation with pop culture anyway.

This man laid down a solid worldview in his book!

This man laid down a strong worldview in his book!

Strong Men Have Strong Worldviews

It’s really no coincidence, but you wont find many weak-looking faggy males who are attracted to a strong message and strong principles. They are always repelled by strength of any sort and seek to hide behind the pathetic protection of the Jew and his moral relativist creed. Try having a conversation with one of these sorts if you want to learn first-hand how pathetic and shitty their ‘arguments’ truly are!

My Conversation With The Lefty Faggot At The Pub

After the last Reclaim Australia rally I ended up talking to this flabby weak looking male and a bunch of other lefties at a pub in town, just for the hell of it really. He knew what I was about and I knew what he was about, so I talked to this effeminate fag for about an hour.  We discussed why I thought what I did and vice versa, and every time I showed him why his opinions were at best very naive and mostly completely stupid. I told him that Hitler was right and that the Jews were the cause of our problems and explained my case logically, but to no avail of course! He ended up getting offended by my swastika ring and despite a relatively peaceful discussion (the “agree to disagree” type because the idiot wouldn’t change his mind), he refused to even shake my hand because of the ring! What pathetic cowardly conduct! I was prepared to shake his hand even though he’d just been preaching communism to me for an hour, mainly because at least he agreed to have a conversation. Our enemies are all pathetic cowards anyway; that’s my point.

Strong men should have no problem putting their worldview out there for others to examine. That’s what I’ve always done and always will!

– BDL1983