Why I Stand For What I Stand For!

Adolf Hitler – we need another one!

ORIGINALLY POSTED 25 Jan 2016 (deleted by wordpress jews)

I’m going to explain a few things here in relatively simple terms, so anyone who is confused or wondering what motivates me can refer to this article.

What Sort Of Society Do I Want To Live In?

I want to live in a society among my own kind, meaning my own race. I do not want to live among those of other races because they are not of my blood and do not share a common world view and basic morality with my race – the White Aryan race. Different breeds (races) of humans are different, and for that reason alone it should make sense to anyone with a thinking brain to keep them separate. Now, despite the fact that there are plenty of arsehole Whites around the place, I’d still a million times over prefer to live with them than non-whites. As for all the Whites who’s natural sense of morality has been led astray, well they need to be re-educated to adhere to proper Christian principles.

Essentially I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality, similar to what we saw in National Socialist Germany. There’s nothing devious or tricky about any of this. It is what it is.

Am I an “Extremist”?

It is not “extreme” to want to live in a White nation with Christian morality. It is a perfectly rational desire for any White person who wants their race and themselves to have a decent future. What is extreme though, is this Jewish agenda to try and force all the non-whites and their foreign belief systems into any White living space, anywhere on earth! That is fucking nuts, pardon my French! So, no, I am not an “extremist” by any stretch. If you want “extremism”, then look no further than the current day Jewish-run political establishment in the west!

Why Won’t I accept Jews, Moslems, Blacks And Other Assorted Mixed-Breeds?

Pretty simple folks – the answer here is that these people (non-whites in general) are trouble makers. People don’t like to hear it, but it’s true and it needs to be said. Follow the historical path of civilization and observe the pattern: White Aryans create the civilization and it flourishes. Then the Jews worm their way in and corrupt everything. Next, they start bringing in other non-whites as slave labour. Finally, we are left with a racially mixed decaying civilization. Hitler explains this in Mein Kampf and it’s true, whether fashionable to say so or not! (it will be fashionable a few years down the track, trust me!) So when I am presented with the options of a White racially pure society or a racially mixed, Jew and negro loving society, which one do you think I’d choose?

Remember – one doesn’t exist without the other.

Do I Have An Irrational Hatred Of Non-Whites?

Absolutely not. I have never been that sort of person. What I do have though, is a perfectly rational hatred for a lot of these people, not because I’m some sort of horrible monster, but because their actions warrant it! They have throughout history caused the downfall of my race’s civilizations, yet I’m supposed to love them all and welcome them in with open arms? People always talk about “learning from history” and if they were serious about it they’d pay attention to my reasoning above.

I Just Can’t Be Bothered With All The Bullshit That Comes Along With A Multicultural (Multiracial) Society

Racial Nationalism is natural. A race or breed should have it’s own territory. You respect the boundaries of your lands, and others should do the same with theirs. If not, you crush the wrong-doer. It’s that simple (in theory anyway).

Multicultural (multiracial) societies run by Jews always turn into Marxist cesspits of competing ethnic groups. This is no good because what it means is the most productive group (Whites) must carry all the useless groups (mostly non-Whites) via taxation and the welfare system until we can’t support it any longer and the society crumbles. Why would I want that?

Anyway, I don’t have any particular feelings of ill-will toward the other races. They can go and do whatever they feel like in their own lands, but not in mine! I just don’t want to live with them or have anything to do with them! Why is that so hard for people to understand?

Feelings About Fags

Faggotry is outside the boundaries of any healthy White Christian society. I do not want their disgusting degeneracy to have any place in my society. I do not uphold the Jewish idea of “freedom” which means anyone anywhere can just do whatever they want, including the dick up bum hole act. This sort of degeneracy all fuels the fire which destroys White society, and that is why I oppose it! A society must have standards if it is to survive!

More About Feelings

I just don’t care about the plight of non-whites. Be they Jews, Arabs, Negroes, Asiatics, or some other exotic mixture, I just don’t care. Never have, never will. I always think “well why would you involve yourself in someone else’s problems?” No, that’s for them in Arab-land or negro-land to figure out. It’s not my business, I don’t care, so they can go cry to someone else about their “oppression”. I won’t bother them if they don’t bother me. It’s pretty simple.

Finally…..

Just to reinforce the point:

I’d like to live in a White nation which operates on a basic code of Christian morality. The best example we have is what we saw in National Socialist Germany:

None of this stuff is hard to understand, nor is it overly complex.

-ETP Admin.

My Melbourne Multicultural Experience

I just recently got back from a New Years trip to Melbourne. I can tell you one thing for sure: Multiculturalism (or more correctly – Multiracialism) does not work. It’s completely ugly, totally unnatural, and strange when you can walk the streets of the town and judging from the people you see, you have absolutely no idea what country you are in. That, for starters, is a pretty good indication that Multiculturalism is a bad idea. As a White man walking the streets of a town in the country which my forefathers built, it is rather unsettling to see virtually no White people. It should make any White person with half a brain realise that something is seriously wrong here. It shouldn’t take a genius to work this out!

This is pretty much the demographic make-up of Melbourne.
This is pretty much the demographic make-up of Melbourne. Take note of the White poof in the background.

Anyway, here’s a few of my general observations, interactions, and thoughts on the whole experience:

I arrived in town by train from Eastern Victoria. The first thing I noticed was that there were hardly any normal looking White people at any of these train stops. There were mainly Asians, Middle-Easterners, and Black Africans getting on and off the train. Not what I expected considering I was still a fair distance out of Melbourne. The other thing I noticed was just how run-down and dilapidated all the buildings looked. Most were completely covered in graffiti, or what the Jew TV now tells us is ‘Street Art’. It’s all just so damn ugly, not to mention fifty million tons of rubbish beside the railway track. I thought sarcastically, “Oh well, this is a nice scenic trip to get to trendy Melbourne”.

Welcome to Melbourne..... Ah, Jeez.... Really....
Welcome to Melbourne….. Ah, Jeez…. Really….

I checked into my hotel, did all the usual boring travelling essentials, and then set out to find something to eat. The first food place I walked past was a Subway. I took a look in there to see what types were making the sandwiches and found two Indians and an African serving people. That made me feel sick, so I kept going. I thought, “Well, screw it all, I’m going to find myself a spot where a White person is working”. By hell, was that a fateful move. I had to walk around for about an hour and a half until I found an American style Chilli Burger place with a White girl working there! There certainly were no other Whites serving food anywhere. This was a great relief since I was feeling like my stomach was going to collapse if I didn’t find edible food soon!

She wasn't this good looking, but at least she was White for something different!
She wasn’t this good looking, but at least she was White!

Right, now that eating was out the way for a while, it was time for a few pints of Guinness! So I went and found a few maps with all the pubs, then set out to drink at the Irish ones. The first one I went into looked like a sound Irish pub, until who should walk out from behind the bar – an Indian. What the hell, I thought I was in an Irish pub! The Indian himself didn’t seem too unfriendly, so I had one pint and thought about how odd it was to see them working Irish pubs. It just isn’t right. You would expect an Irish man or Irish lass, at least someone White for Christ’s sake! So I scoffed the pint quickly and moved on. The next Irish pub was a keeper! Phew, about time! Irish serving the beers, Irish playing the Celtic tunes, and 99% Whites in the pub! Definitely a big highlight of Melbourne! I probably drank a whole keg of Guinness before I left the place! Good times eh!

Oh yeah!
Oh yeah!

The next day, after nursing off the Guinness hangover, I set off for the Queen Victoria Markets. There’s a few good ‘odds and sods’ there, but once again, about five billion Asians, a few blacks, a few Jews, and a handful of Whites. That was the ethnic make-up. Anyone who’s been there knows! Whatever, I knew the markets were like that before I went. I was in a fairly good mood as I left, knowing full-well that I was going to grab a few take-out beers to drink at the hotel before I decided what to do for Saturday night. Even being served by Indians at the liquor store didn’t dampen my spirits! (See, how’s that for a display of tolerance? Take note any Jews who are reading this!)

Upon heading out that night, I was torn between two options:

1)      Go out to the Cricket game and try to enjoy that, or

2)      Just forget the Cricket and go to another Irish pub.

I walked out the hotel still undecided. That was until I saw some of the Cricket fans walking to the oval. Holy shit – that was an impressive sight. A bunch of big fat idiots waddling along wearing their stupid meaningless team colours. That helped me make my decision rather quickly. Either go find a good Irish pub, or pay to sit among a bunch of low IQ morons and drink overpriced beer while they wave their stupid flags and eat hamburgers all night! Easy decision really: another Irish pub!

The alternative to Irish pubs...... KFC is the big sponsor, just to make the fans a bit fatter!
The alternative to Irish pubs…… 20/20 Cricket. KFC is the big sponsor, just to make the fans a bit fatter!

I eventually got to the pub I had in mind and had another good night with mostly Whites and more Irish tunes. One thing came up unexpectedly at the end of the night as I was just finishing my four millionth pint of Guinness – a political discussion. Naturally, I couldn’t help myself. I had to put in my two cents. I overheard the topic of ‘Global Warming’ and I said that it was all a load of bullshit and an utterly feeble hoax. Well, well, did this guy think I was an insane lunatic for doubting what the TV told him! I suppose it isn’t really worth bothering with these types, since they are totally unsusceptible to factual reasoning in the first place, but I couldn’t help myself. I argued back and forth squashing every stupid idea that he had in his head, while just ignoring his childish reactionary behaviour every time I said anything. One thing with the ‘Lefty-Liberal-Jew-Loving-Multiculti-Wanna-be-a-Commie-types’ is that they have no arguments which make any sense, so all it comes back to every time is the old-fashioned name-calling tactic. They all seem to think that they are expert psycho-analysts, and as long as they call you some sort of ‘ist’ or ‘ism’, then they are winning the argument! Eventually I got sick of talking to the guy, but before I went I told him that I was a National Socialist, and a racist anti-Semite. He didn’t particularly like that, of course, and kept rambling on about how the only reason I didn’t approve of Communism was because ‘Perfect Communism’ had never been allowed to flourish!!! I was thinking of bed while listening to this drivel from “Mr. Yawn Dot Com”! Ah well, we can’t win ‘em all, and certainly not by trying to argue with committed Communists! I only did it for fun anyway!

We would have made a good team against Mr. Perfect Communism, but she wasn't there...
We would have made a good team against Mr. “Perfect Communism”, but she wasn’t there…

Next day, and another Guinness hangover and a few hours to waste before I was scheduled to leave Melbourne; what to do? Since the Test Cricket (real cricket) was on, I went to Federation Square to watch a bit of it on the ‘Big Screen’! This place is the ‘absolute-ultimate-double-everything-you-are-already-thinking’ Multicultural hub of Melbourne. It wasn’t that there were absolutely no Whites there, I just don’t think there were too many who weren’t fags or that strange effeminate third gender, where the person is a pathetic skinny piece of shit, technically male I suppose, but with no-testosterone, the ‘emo’ hair, and the skinny-jeans! It’s pretty sickening to look at these types of ‘people’ wandering about the place aimlessly. I felt like bashing the piss out of the one who came and stood near me when I was watching the cricket! Skinny useless weakling!

The strange effeminate one that stood next to me looked like this
The strange effeminate one that stood next to me looked like this… Big muscles for fighting eh!!! We could make a soldier out of him yet…. Yeah right!

Jew architecture of "Fed Square"..... Looks like a weird wacked out lump of shit doesn't it?
Jew architecture of “Fed Square”….. Looks like a weird wacked out lump of shit doesn’t it? Apparently it’s trendy and modern and I’m the one who just refuses to get with the times. You decide.

After leaving Fed Square and all the absolutely horrible Jew architecture which looks like shit – the funniest, but maybe not even the most disturbing creature walked past me. This ‘man’, if you could call him that, was about fifty years old, white, with a bit of stubble, red lipstick, hairy legs, and he was wearing a fucking dress!

He looked a bit like this and I'll bet he felt just as "liberated"...... I'm gonna throw up.
He looked a bit like this and I’ll bet he felt just as “liberated”………… Sickening eh…

I literally burst out laughing. I couldn’t help it. None of the Asians around me got the joke! This wonderful cross-dressing specimen of our own White Race was walking around like that and no-one even seemed to notice. Any White person who doesn’t mock the hell out of these weirdos is a lost cause as far as I’m concerned!

That is about it as far as my ‘Melbourne Multicultural Experience’ goes. It certainly was a disgusting display of what happens when a race has completely forgotten who they are, and are blatantly being overrun by a sick, degenerate, Jewish-enforced ‘culture’.

This is another great example of a trendy "Melburnian" man.
This is another great example of a trendy “Melburnian” man.

To have forty thousand ethnic groups all in one place does not enrich any culture. All it does is weaken and eventually destroy the race responsible for founding the original culture – I.e. the White Race. Melbourne is a done deal from what I’ve seen. The White Race is getting what it deserves in that city because it has been too gutless and cowardly to tell it like it is, or do anything about it (see above picture for proof). All of the pathetic White pieces of shit deserve to be wiped out. I no longer feel any sympathy for them, whatsoever. I hope the Jews and coloured swarms do absorb them, or just finish them off!

The most pressing question for Whites is this:

Now that you can see the precedent of White Genocide being set in all the major cities around the formerly White Nations of the world; can you also tell that this is not going to stop until we are all gone?

Does it have to be any clearer to you White men out there? The Jews are not going to stop flooding our countries until we are FINISHED as a race? EXTERMINATED! BANISHED! This is not a joke.

Something must be done, and it must be done soon!

Hitler certainly was right!

1488

– BDL1983

The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 1 of 5

From The Occidental Observer:

By Brenton Sanderson

Results from the 2011 Australian Census reveal that, for the first time in that nation’s history, the majority of migrants are now arriving from Asia instead of Europe. Indians and Chinese have become the fastest growing sections of the Australian population. Between 2006 and 2011 the number of Australian permanent residents born in India increased by 100 per cent, those born in China increased by 54 per cent, while those born in the Philippines by 42 per cent. These startling figures do not even include those born in Australia to Indian or Chinese parents. The Census also revealed that other non-White immigrant groups are also expanding rapidly, including various African groups. All of this is dismal news for White Australians and, indeed, for White people everywhere. Unfortunately, these figures only mirror what is happening throughout the West, where White people are under demographic and cultural siege from race-replacing levels of Third World immigration and the official embrace of “multiculturalism.”

In just a few decades these malignant policies have transformed Western societies to the detriment of their European-derived populations and culture. It is a remarkable fact that this revolution in immigration and social policy throughout the West occurred at around the same time (1962-1973), and that in all countries these changes reflected the attitude of elites rather than the great mass of citizens. Changes in immigration policy and the imposition of multiculturalism were imposed on resentful European populations despite overwhelming popular opposition to non-European immigration. The driving force behind this totally undemocratic shift in policy was the Jewish intellectual movements and ethno-political activism that Kevin MacDonald documented in The Culture of Critique. For those aware of the pivotal role of Jews in driving the demographic and cultural transformation of the United States, the story of the Jewish role in radically reengineering Australian society will have a depressingly familiar ring to it. 

Australia was the last habitable continent settled by Europeans. In 1901 the British colonies of Australia federated to form an independent nation. The first Act passed by the new federal parliament was the Immigration Restriction Act which, through imposing a dictation test in any European language (usually English), effectively barred non-White immigration to Australia. Until the cultural revolution of the 1960s, Australia remained an unashamedly White Christian nation with a strong Anglo-Celtic ethnic base. Indeed the long-running (now defunct) news magazine The Bulletin maintained the slogan “Australia for the White Man” on its masthead until 1961. By 1947 the non-European population, other than Aborigines, was measured at 0.25 per cent of the total. As a result of the Immigration Restriction Act, Australia had become, by this time, one of the Whitest countries in the world. Ian Cook makes the point that “The ‘White Australia’ policy was a fairly self-conscious and explicit attempt to protect a particular genetic inheritance from being diluted by other genetic lines.”[i] The policy was extraordinarily successful in this endeavor, and the historian Eric Richards observes that, in retrospect, it is extraordinary that so remote a settlement could maintain such a homogeneous population composition.[ii]

Australia and New Zealand were also the two most “British” societies outside the United Kingdom, and Australia was, proportionately, the most Irish society outside Ireland. The imperial loyalties of the Australian colonists were often explained by reference to the “crimson thread of kinship” that existed between Britain and Australia. Australian identity was founded upon three distinct yet interrelated components: racial Whiteness, “Britishness,” and “Australianness.”[iii] The attempted Japanese invasion of northern Australia in WWII proved that the longstanding fear of an Asian invasion (the “Yellow Peril”) was far from the neurotic, xenophobic anxiety disparaged by today’s politically correct historians. In the 1960s there was no popular movement for ending the White Australia policy, a policy that had retained the bipartisan support of Australia’s political class since its inception in 1901. Indeed, Richards notes that “Australia’s adherence to ‘Whiteness’ was its defining characteristic,” and that “None of the other great immigrant countries was able to sustain such a degree of homogeneity.”[iv] Hawkins makes the point that

the primary and identical motivation of Canadian and Australian politicians in trying to exclude first the Chinese, then other Asian migrants and finally all potential non-white immigrants, was the desire to build and preserve societies and political systems in their hard-won, distant lands very like those of the United Kingdom. They also wished to establish without challenge the primary role there of her founding peoples of European origin. … Undisputed ownership of these territories of continental size was felt to be confirmed forever, not only by the fact of possession, but by the hardships and dangers endured by the early explorers and settlers; the years of back-breaking work to build the foundations of urban and rural life. … The idea that other peoples, who had taken no part in these pioneering efforts, might simply arrive in large numbers to exploit important local resources, or to take advantage of these earlier settlement efforts, was anathema.[v]     

Tied in with these natural and legitimate expressions of racial and ethnic solidarity, were concerns hordes of non-White immigrants would drive down the wages and living standards of White Australians. This was a key part of the original rationale for the White Australia policy as articulated by Alfred Deakin, Australia’s first Attorney-General, who argued that

a white Australia does not by any means just mean the preservation of the complexion of the people of this country. It means the multiplying of homes, so that we may be able to defend every part of our continent; it means the maintenance of conditions of life fit for white men and white women; it means equal laws and opportunities for all; it means protection against underpaid labour of other lands, it means the payment of fair wages. A white Australia means a civilisation whose foundations are built on healthy lives, lived in honest toil, under circumstances which imply no degradation; a white Australia means protection.”[vi]  

An analogous view had been expressed as early as 1841 by James Stephen, the powerful head of the British colonial office in London, who declared that Australia should be a land “where the English race shall be spread from sea to sea unmixed with any lower caste.” He maintained that the introduction of Indian “coolies” into New South Wales would “debase by their intermixture the noble European race… bring with them the idolatry and debasing habits of their country… beat down the wages of poor laboring Europeans… [and] cut off the resource for many of our own distressed people.”[vii] Charles Pearson, a British scholar who migrated to the colonies in the late nineteenth century, published a book entitled National Life and Character in 1893. In it, he described Australia as “an unexampled instance of a great continent that has been left for the first civilized people that found it to take and occupy. He warned, nevertheless, that it was still questionable whether the white races would be able to hold on to it in the face of the Asiatic threat:

We know that coloured and white labour cannot exist side by side; we are well aware that China can swamp us with a single year’s surplus of population; and we know that if national existence is sacrificed to the working of a few mines and sugar plantations, it is not the Englishman and Australian alone, but the whole civilized world, that will be the losers.[viii]

Such concerns echoed through the decades of the White Australia policy, where the country explicitly defined its nationhood in terms of Whiteness and a policy of economic protectionism designed to benefit the entire group by preventing, say, Australian capitalists from importing cheap labor that would undercut the standard of living of other White Australians. The policy reflected the desire of Australians to build a strong and prosperous society founded upon the principles of racial and cultural homogeneity and fairness within the racial group. Gwenda Tavan notes that the White Australia policy was a “morally imbued affirmation of the type of society Australians wanted to build: white and British-Australian as well as cohesive, conformist, liberal-democratic and egalitarian.”[ix] One commentator reflected this view when noting in 1939 that “The Australian prides himself on his high standard of living; he wishes to do nothing that will endanger it. Neither does he wish to bring into being a colour problem such as he sees in South Africa.”[x]

 

Early twentieth century Australian poster

Rather than being driven by any shift in public opinion, the impetus for the progressive dismantling of the White Australia policy, and the move from assimilation to multiculturalism between 1966 and 1975 came “from a small group of reformers that began appearing in some Australian universities in the 1960s” who, like their counterparts in the United States and Britain, soon comprised a hostile intellectual, academic and media elite who “developed a sense of being a member of a morally and intellectually superior ingroup battling against Australian parochial non-intellectuals as an outgroup.”[xi] In the changing ideological climate of the 1950s and 1960s, the moral foundations of Australia’s British history were subjected to radical criticism, and once foundational patriotic works like Keith Hancock’s Australia (with its maxim that “among the Australians pride of race counted for more than love of country”) were no longer compulsory reading for students. [xii]

Boasian anthropology and the fall of White Australia

The Boasian ideology of racial egalitarianism (discussed in Chapter 2 of The Culture of Critique as a Jewish intellectual movement) was a critical weapon in opening Australian immigration up to non-White groups. Jewish academic Jon Stratton notes that the dismantling of the White Australia policy and the ultimate adoption of multiculturalism was a direct result of “internal and external pressures related to a general turning away from biological racialism.”[xiii] The Australian Jewish academic Andrew Markus articulates the standard critique of “white racism” that became prominent in the 1960s when he asserts that it was based on the notion that

(i) as a result of some (undefined) “natural” process, national groups (or ‘races’ or ‘cultures’) have inborn (‘essential’) qualities which will never alter; and (ii) there are inherent characteristics in such groups which interpose barriers against harmonious co-existence, not least against interbreeding of populations. Such ideas give rise to closed forms of nationalism which restrict membership to those qualified by birth or descent, in contrast to open forms which grant citizenship to individuals on the basis of residence and adherence to the governing principles of the nation. They justified European colonial rule; the denial of basic human rights and citizenship; segregation in the workplace, housing and education; and policies of genocide culminating in the “factories of death” established in the period of Nazi domination of continental Europe. Rarely challenged in western societies prior to 1940, the idea of biological racial difference lost much of its legitimacy in the aftermath of the Holocaust.[xiv]

It is obvious from this statement just how closely acceptance of the myth of racial equality from the 1960s onwards was bound up with Jewish post-Holocaust ethno-political activism. Note also the outright lies and hypocrisy in the above paragraph. The “(undefined) ‘natural’ process” that Markus claims is the wholly irrational basis for “racism” is the very well-defined process of human evolution itself. The differential evolution of human groups in response to selection pressures imposed by diverse environments, resulted, after thousands of years, in differences in external morphology and psychological traits—including intelligence as measured by IQ tests. The average intelligence of a group will profoundly influence the society that will be created by that group. There is nothing undefined, irrational, or pseudo-scientific about this whatsoever.

Professor Andrew Markus: Propagating “noble lies”

In his description of “closed” forms of nationalism which restrict “membership to those qualified by birth or descent” Markus could be describing traditional Judaism, with its strict endogamy and built-in assumptions of Jewish racial, intellectual and moral superiority. As always, however, Judaism is outside the critical frame of reference of such reflexively anti-White Jewish intellectuals. Jewish ethno-nationalism (exemplified in Israel’s racially restrictive immigration laws) is tacitly held to be legitimate and uncontroversial (indeed a moral imperative), while White nationalism is inherently illegitimate and morally corrupt.

The rampant hypocrisy of this is particularly striking given that Australian Jews have “been at the forefront of support for the right of the state of Israel to exist as a Jewish state, to determine its own security agenda, and to do what is needed to ensure its own survival.”[xv]  Indeed, the academic and Australian Jewish activist Danny Ben Moshe points out that Australian Jewry is fiercely Zionist and “outdoes all other Diasporas in their commitment to Israel.” A 1993 survey of Melbourne Jewry found that 63 per cent had visited Israel with over 40 per cent having done so two or more times. This is compared with 36 per cent of American Jews. Australia also has the highest rate of aliyah in the world.[xvi] While strongly in favor of non-White immigration and racial-mixing among the non-Jews in Australia, a publication like the Australian Jewish News can openly express the view that for Jews, “Intermarriage has always been and will always be an individual, spiritual and communal tragedy. No amount of petty rationalising will ever change that.”[xvii]

Noting the incredible hypocrisy involved in simultaneously condemning white racialism while defending the Jewish ethno-nationalist state of Israel (and traditional Jewish prohibitions against intermarriage), Kevin MacDonald observes in The Culture of Critique that:

Ironically, many intellectuals who absolutely reject evolutionary thinking and any imputation that genetic self-interest might be important in human affairs also favor policies that are rather self-interestedly ethnocentric, and they often condemn the self-interested ethnocentric behavior of other groups, particularly any indication that the European-derived majority… is developing a cohesive group strategy and high levels of ethnocentrism in reaction to the groups strategies of others. …  A Jew maintaining this argument should, to retain intellectual consistency, agree that the traditional Jewish concern with endogamy and consanguinity has been irrational. Moreover, such a person would also believe that Jews ought not attempt to retain political power in Israel because there is no rational reason to suppose that any particular group should have power anywhere. Nor should Jews attempt to influence the political process … in such a manner as to disadvantage another group or benefit their own. And to be logically consistent, one should also apply this argument to all those who promote immigration of their own ethnic groups, the mirror image of group-based opposition to such immigration.[xviii]  

Since the academic world is international and hierarchical, it was inevitable that intellectual movements originating in elite American universities spread throughout the West (see “Liberal Bias in Academia: The role of Jewish academics in the creation and maintenance of academic liberalism“) As a consequence of the growing influence of the Jewish intellectual movements described in The Culture of Critique, and direct Jewish activism in Australia, “Such views [i.e. the assumption racial equality] became standard within schools and universities and provided the intellectual basis for campaigns against racial discrimination in the late 1950s and 1960s.”[xix] Tavan notes that: “As a result of these shifts, universities in particular became ‘hotbeds of resistance’ to White Australia during the late 1950s and early 1960s. … The emergence of a body of Marxist-inspired social theory in Europe and the United States at that time also reinvigorated radical left-wing political theory in Australia.” For Tavan, the new critical theory of the Frankfurt School “played a crucial role in exposing the racist underpinnings of many of Australia’s key institutions and values.”[xx] The Frankfurt School abandoned the White working class because they were insufficiently radical and had succumbed to fascism in Germany and Italy. This caused them to reject the orthodox Marxist emphasis on class struggle, replacing it by advocating non-White immigration and multiculturalism, as well as recruiting Whites who had complaints against the traditional culture, particularly feminists and sexual minorities, into a new coalition of the left.

With the adoption in 1963 of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, member governments were urged to eliminate racial discrimination from their society altogether. Internal intellectual currents were thus augmented by mounting external political opposition to the White Australia policy, especially during the years of European decolonization in Africa and Asia. Eric Richards notes how

Prime Minister Menzies [1949-1966] was increasingly vexed by the intrusion of racial and immigration issues at meetings of Commonwealth Heads of Government. Menzies (and even more vehemently, one of his successors, John Gorton) loathed the way in which he was lectured on the “principle of racial equality” by newcomer members of the Commonwealth. Menzies and Gorton [1968-1971] believed that Australia’s immigration policy was perfectly defensible and, in any case, none of their business. But the die was already cast. Australia in the 1960s felt pressure from within and from beyond, and its immigration policy was a growing embarrassment.[xxi]    

Senior Australian public servants serving on a committee formed to respond to the changed situation agreed in 1964 that “there was an urgent need to remove, as far as practicable, instances of racial discrimination in Australia in order to ensure Australia’s international reputation and influence are not to be seriously endangered.”[xxii] In response to these internal and external pressures, the administrative apparatus of the White Australia policy was gradually dismantled from the mid-1960s, until, in 1974, the then Labor Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam (1972-1975), declared in a speech that: “On Immigration, we have removed the last remaining pieces of legislation which could be described as discriminatory on racial grounds.”[xxiii]

According to the Australian academic and multicultural activist Bronwyn Hinz, this policy change merely formalized shifts in policy approach that had begun in the 1960s in response to reforms to the United States migration policy.[xxiv] Richards observes that this “hesitating shift towards a non-discriminatory Australia” triggered “a social and demographic revolution” in Australia[xxv] In both America and Australia, Jewish intellectual movements and political activism were pivotal in driving this revolution. The national editor of the Australian Jewish News, Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges this, noting that: “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.” The exact nature of this crusade will be explored in subsequent parts of this essay. 

Source Article & References

Part 2 of 5 – The History of Judaism in Australia –

Part 3 of 5 – Walter Lippmann – The Jewish architect of Australian Multiculturalism

Part 4 of 5 – Opposition to multiculturalism in Australia and the Jewish response

Part 5 of 5 – Jewish anti-White activism and Australia’s Aborigines

An absolutely irrefutable, superb series of articles proving why we say it’s the Jews behind our “multicultural” woes in Australia.

– BDL1983