Tag Archives: Jews

The Toothless Tiger in the Face of Mystery Babylon

CelticCrosstika

It’s time for some hard truths about the Toothless Tiger known as “White Nationalism” or the “Alt-Right” in it’s more modern trendy incarnation.

I’ve been awake to the race and jew thing for about 8 years now, and as a result I’m very well acquainted with White Nationalism and how it works. Well, actually, how it doesn’t work and never will. There are an infinite number of reasons why, and I’m going to attempt to explain a few things here – things I’ve been pondering lately. The immediate reality is depressing and if White Nationalism is what we are hoping is going to save us, then we are already fucked. 100%, absolutely no doubt about it – fucked. BUT, with a deeper understanding of why we are in this disastrous situation, everything becomes clear! We have no hope at all if we approach our problems through the WN way of thinking. It is a shallow worldview and devoid of any real moral substance, let alone the fact that WN is completely out of touch with reality AND it’s a tried and proven failure.

Now, let’s be honest and 100% realistic about White Nationalism:

If we look around at our current situation we see nothing but a society that’s completely lost it’s identity, lost it’s culture, and is simultaneously being racially dissolved. To put it mildly, what we have now constituting the “general public” is a mess. It is a multiracial, fat, lazy, stupid, degenerate cesspool, where most white people are too far gone to ever be “woken up”. (Not that a majority ever “wake up”, but for them to even conform to basic moral norms of a healthy society.)

Now that that’s established, let’s prove how naive (or just plain stupid) most White Nationalists are concerning their plight of creating an all-white nation somewhere as an answer to the global jewish problem. For better or worse, or whatever, most White Nationalists look up to and idolize National Socialist Germany as an example of WN success. I can appreciate that angle because NS Germany was indeed a great example of how well a white society can function. Now, being 100% clear and logical here – The only way Hitler rebuilt Germany out of the ‘ashes’ of the Weimar Republic was by utilizing the racial stock already present in Germany. The Weimar Republic may have been a cesspool of jewish degeneracy, BUT there was still an overwhelming GERMAN majority to work with. Now, we all know how great the Third Reich functioned as a society and the fight it put up in WW2. Well, it’s now time for that dreaded bitter pill – Germany lost the war and ultimately failed. I don’t like to think about that bitter pill either, but it’s still a fact. It was the best resistance a “kingdom of man” could offer the jewish beast, and it failed because the beast’s power base was able to use all the other white countries to destroy it.

jewish power in this globalized age is almost total

Even if somehow a white country somewhere managed to pull-off the task of creating a kind of “Fourth Reich”, they would be destroyed by the jews controlling the rest of the world. And if you doubt this – consider the fact that jewish power was consolidated (i.e. increased – state of Israhell, U.N. formed, entire world reinforcing Allied victors agenda, etc…) after WW2 into the global behemoth it is now. The Third Reich was destroyed by a lesser jewish power than we have to contend with in 2017. So, if we think we can politic our way into defeating the jews, then maybe we should think again! Add to all this, the fact that society is completely fucked up – I mean, where is this “Fourth Reich” coming from, and who’s going to organize and build it? It would also have to be superior to the Third Reich because jew power has gone up, not down, since then. This is why WN is a joke. It is a toothless tiger.

Another interesting point about WN is that it’s something that has been tried and proven to fail, over and over throughout history. The western countries we now live in were all created based on varying formats of “White Nationalism”. True, it is easy to come up with ideas like “oh, it would have worked if they excluded the jews in the constitution” etc, but ultimately it wouldn’t have worked because the jews, through corrupt men, would have weaseled their way in, eventually. White Nationalism is always destined to failure because it attempts to create another “kingdom of man” ruled by men and their inherent flaws – rather than a Kingdom of God. The only reason the Third Reich was as successful as it was, is because it was inspired and based very closely on correct biblical precepts. It is the closest example of God’s Kingdom on earth as a “kingdom of man” could replicate. It had a few flaws, but not many, because Adolf Hitler was a divinely inspired man with his heart in the right spot – with God and his German people.

Revelation Chapter 18 and the fall of Mystery Babylon

White Nationalist’s who reject Christianity will never understand this because they don’t want to, but the state of affairs we find ourselves in is a punishment from God. The Mystery Babylon described in chapters 17 and 18 of Revelation are exactly where we find ourselves placed in world history, right now! Mystery Babylon put simply is a global order of jewish (satanic) rule by money, an abomination of abominations on the earth. It is described as falling rather quickly (in biblical terms).

The most important thing for someone to know about the current Mystery Babylon is that it is parasitic and contradictory in nature. It is akin to the serpent (jewish) eating it’s own tail. It destroys itself given the right amount of time, however long that happens to be. We have absolutely no political means to fight the beast in it’s current state. If we did, we would, but that’s not a possibility. The jewish beast has to, and will, weaken itself significantly in the future. If you don’t see how that could happen, then you haven’t considered the true source of their strength. WE are the true source of their power, for without us, the White Adamic race, to toil and naively provide them with all the material wealth of the earth, they are nothing but shallow soulless vessels of destruction – vampires with no blood left to drink. When the time is right, God’s wrath will be upon the house of Esau (today’s jews) via our hands:

Obadiah 1:18 –

And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it.

None left of the house of Esau! When you combine this with the fall of Mystery Babylon in Revelation 18, which happens in a relatively short period of time, you can see why the jews are going to do anything they can to keep their satanic grip on power. Once they self-destruct, their time is short. And they know it.

As I said above, the jews are a parasitic entity. They know we have provided them with the world’s material wealth, yet they still hate and seek to destroy us – bastards! Stupid bastards too, when looked at logically, but the jews can’t help it because they are cursed from Genesis 3:15. God put enmity between our seed and the serpent’s seed, meaning they literally cannot NOT try to destroy our race, hence why the jews have a special hatred for us and flood our nations with non-whites (Revelation 17:15), either in the hope of mixing us out of existence or them killing us.

Awaiting the Fall of Mystery Babylon

Once you understand the real nature of what is in the Bible, you will soon see that it offers us the only ironclad defense system capable of eliminating anything jewish.

While we await the fall of Mystery Babylon we should be trying to uphold a code of basic Christian morality in our own personal lives, as a start. God knows, we all do things wrong. I probably do heaps of things wrong myself, but I try to do right!

In a proactive sense, our job right now is to remove ourselves from Babylon as much as possible (Revelation 18:4) and network with good like-minded White people and tell the truth. Spread the truth to those willing to hear – “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.” If the person you are talking to doesn’t want to hear, then just cast them aside, as they are in all likelihood a lost cause before you even opened your mouth.

In the end we win. God assures us of that in the Scriptures. What we do now on a personal level, we can only hope hastens the process! God’s Law leads us to victory and there is no getting around it. The longer we refuse to adhere to it, the longer our race will be punished.

For info on the Revelation go to ChristReich.org.

– BDL1983

Love & Hate…. AGAIN!

Remember - one doesn't exist without the other.

Remember – one doesn’t exist without the other.

The thing about us allegedly being driven by hate never stops coming up. According to the leftist Jew-loving communist types, people of our political persuasion are just about the only people on the planet who’ve ever hated anything. Without us the world would be one big happy love-fest, arms linked around a camp fire singing ‘Kumbaya’….. Yeah right.

Well, in multicultural tolerance land this happens all the time. Why don't you White Supremacists get on board?

Well, in “multicultural tolerance land” this happens all the time. Why don’t you White Supremacists get on board?

So why mention all this again? Because if you have a look at the faces in this article it is clear which side of the political divide is driven by hatred. It is definitely not our side, and I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone who’d claim to be driven by hatred. The hatred I encounter all the time from our side is a perfectly rational one. Since the Jews and commie bastards want to destroy our race, which we love (sometimes I don’t know why), then it follows that you will hate them for wanting to do that!

We would never have to explain such simple concepts as ‘opposing emotions’ if humans weren’t such a dim-witted species. Unfortunately, humans ARE dim-witted for the most part, so here we go again:

Everything is explained in this old article which I may as well re-post in its entirety:

The Thing About Love And Hate.

We often hear a lot in this ‘movement’ about there being too much hate. People often complain about hate as if it is somehow an irrational, unnecessary emotion for humans to feel toward someone or something. Well, the truth of the matter is that if hate were an unnecessary part of the human make-up, then we would have been born with an innate inability to feel hate. Anyone who is honest and has more than half a brain knows that they hate certain things in life – everyone does. There’s nothing wrong with feeling hate. It’s natural, normal and healthy.

Love and hate are polar opposites emotionally. This is a simple fact of nature, like how good and evil are also polar opposites. This is where the cunning Jew likes to confuse matters. The Jew knows very well that 99% of well-intentioned people like the sound of “love and good” far more than they like the sound of “hate and evil”. So, being the eternal deceiver and liar that he is, he tricks people’s minds into believing that ‘hate’ = ‘evil’, and ‘love’ = ‘good’. It is a cunning deception as usual, but it can be easily exposed for the deception it is by highlighting the fact that if hate equals evil, and love equals good, then why would we need different words to express the exact same emotion? Hate is not necessarily evil, nor is love necessarily good – this is what the Jew doesn’t want anyone to think about rationally and it’s also why they put so much effort into ‘combating hate’ and crap like that. The purpose of their campaign against ‘hate’ is to turn whatever it is that someone doesn’t like into a psychological disorder then get “Dr. Rosenblum” to prescribe Jew psychiatric pharmaceuticals to cure the ‘hater’!

A couple simple case examples:

If someone came to your house, murdered your family and stole a bunch of things, would you hate them? Of course you would! The ‘hate’ in this case is a healthy force for good! If you loved this person you’d be a mental patient.

If someone helped you through some personal problems, let you use their car, and gave you some financial help, would you love and appreciate them? Of course you would! The ‘love’ in this case is a wholesome healthy emotion! If you hated this person you’d be a mental patient once again!

I rest my case.

The main reason I think they are so fixated on eliminating ‘hate’ is because Jews know that Jewish behaviour is so fundamentally unlikeable to anyone of any race, that portraying the ‘hater’ as a social outcast or a psychopath is the only tactic they can use to convince the rest of society that “this is where ‘hating’ gets you”. The Jews know damn well that when the inevitable backlash against them comes, they want a world with as few ‘haters’ as possible – haters of them, that is. Funny how the Jew doesn’t care about any communist or left-wing hate which is very, very often directed toward us, and blatantly so. Once again the Jew is exposed for the hypocritical liar that he is!

This is how ‘love and hate’ works through my eyes:

We, on the National Socialist truthful-side-of-politics stand for and love our own race (despite their current problematic state). This comes from our innate healthy instincts which tell us to do so. These instincts are strong and can’t be over-ridden. It follows logically from here that since we are telling the truth about our love for our race, then we would also hate anything and everything which poses a threat to our racial well-being and survival. That’s just common sense from my perspective.

They, on the Jewish/Communist/Left-Wing side of politics hate our White race. They seek our destruction because as an infinitely more capable race than any other, we shatter their stupid and utterly wrongful delusions of racial equality and multiculturalism. We are the only real threat to the Jewish plan for world domination and the Communists idea of everyone being equal. Clearly they are the psychopathic side of this argument, since all of their ideas are not based on reality or nature, but on delusion! The only love felt on this side of the political fence is self-love and the love of their own unrestrained egoism. This is because they have nothing worth loving, no true ideals, and are either Jews or disaffected, detached individuals with no capacity for truly caring about the most important thing everyone has right in front of them – their own genetic race – their own bloodline!

The Jews (and their lackeys) hate us because our race is an obstacle to them achieving their agenda. There is no other reason for their hatred of us; for they know very well that we have not persecuted them. We have always been provoked by them and eventually got fed up with their behaviour and given them the boot!

We hate the Jews because of what they do. If they didn’t constantly work toward our racial destruction and just left us alone and went and lived among themselves somewhere else, then we would never have had a problem with them! It’s that simple.

Finally, to any of our Jewish friends or communist lackeys reading this – here’s something to bear in mind:

When the White man with racial love and pride in his heart finally gets furious, you’ll find out that your hatred is nothing compared to ours, for you have no true love. We do, and it gives us infinite strength to crush our enemies with!

This quote from George Lincoln Rockwell sums the situation up nicely:

Without a deadly hatred of that which threatens what we love, love is an empty catchword for hippies, queers, and cowards…

Also very relevant reading: Why I Stand For What I Stand For!

– BDL1983

The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 1 of 5

Note: I’m REPOSTING this article because bugger-all White Australians know about the Jewish role in disposing of the White Australia Policy. White Australians – memorise the Jewish names mentioned so you can rattle them off when quizzed on the subject. (People listen if you actually know what you’re talking about… well, they might…..)

From The Occidental Observer:

By Brenton Sanderson

Results from the 2011 Australian Census reveal that, for the first time in that nation’s history, the majority of migrants are now arriving from Asia instead of Europe. Indians and Chinese have become the fastest growing sections of the Australian population. Between 2006 and 2011 the number of Australian permanent residents born in India increased by 100 per cent, those born in China increased by 54 per cent, while those born in the Philippines by 42 per cent. These startling figures do not even include those born in Australia to Indian or Chinese parents. The Census also revealed that other non-White immigrant groups are also expanding rapidly, including various African groups. All of this is dismal news for White Australians and, indeed, for White people everywhere. Unfortunately, these figures only mirror what is happening throughout the West, where White people are under demographic and cultural siege from race-replacing levels of Third World immigration and the official embrace of “multiculturalism.”

In just a few decades these malignant policies have transformed Western societies to the detriment of their European-derived populations and culture. It is a remarkable fact that this revolution in immigration and social policy throughout the West occurred at around the same time (1962-1973), and that in all countries these changes reflected the attitude of elites rather than the great mass of citizens. Changes in immigration policy and the imposition of multiculturalism were imposed on resentful European populations despite overwhelming popular opposition to non-European immigration. The driving force behind this totally undemocratic shift in policy was the Jewish intellectual movements and ethno-political activism that Kevin MacDonald documented in The Culture of Critique. For those aware of the pivotal role of Jews in driving the demographic and cultural transformation of the United States, the story of the Jewish role in radically reengineering Australian society will have a depressingly familiar ring to it.

Australia was the last habitable continent settled by Europeans. In 1901 the British colonies of Australia federated to form an independent nation. The first Act passed by the new federal parliament was the Immigration Restriction Act which, through imposing a dictation test in any European language (usually English), effectively barred non-White immigration to Australia. Until the cultural revolution of the 1960s, Australia remained an unashamedly White Christian nation with a strong Anglo-Celtic ethnic base. Indeed the long-running (now defunct) news magazine The Bulletin maintained the slogan “Australia for the White Man” on its masthead until 1961. By 1947 the non-European population, other than Aborigines, was measured at 0.25 per cent of the total. As a result of the Immigration Restriction Act, Australia had become, by this time, one of the Whitest countries in the world. Ian Cook makes the point that “The ‘White Australia’ policy was a fairly self-conscious and explicit attempt to protect a particular genetic inheritance from being diluted by other genetic lines.”[i] The policy was extraordinarily successful in this endeavor, and the historian Eric Richards observes that, in retrospect, it is extraordinary that so remote a settlement could maintain such a homogeneous population composition.[ii]

Australia and New Zealand were also the two most “British” societies outside the United Kingdom, and Australia was, proportionately, the most Irish society outside Ireland. The imperial loyalties of the Australian colonists were often explained by reference to the “crimson thread of kinship” that existed between Britain and Australia. Australian identity was founded upon three distinct yet interrelated components: racial Whiteness, “Britishness,” and “Australianness.”[iii] The attempted Japanese invasion of northern Australia in WWII proved that the longstanding fear of an Asian invasion (the “Yellow Peril”) was far from the neurotic, xenophobic anxiety disparaged by today’s politically correct historians. In the 1960s there was no popular movement for ending the White Australia policy, a policy that had retained the bipartisan support of Australia’s political class since its inception in 1901. Indeed, Richards notes that “Australia’s adherence to ‘Whiteness’ was its defining characteristic,” and that “None of the other great immigrant countries was able to sustain such a degree of homogeneity.”[iv] Hawkins makes the point that

the primary and identical motivation of Canadian and Australian politicians in trying to exclude first the Chinese, then other Asian migrants and finally all potential non-white immigrants, was the desire to build and preserve societies and political systems in their hard-won, distant lands very like those of the United Kingdom. They also wished to establish without challenge the primary role there of her founding peoples of European origin. … Undisputed ownership of these territories of continental size was felt to be confirmed forever, not only by the fact of possession, but by the hardships and dangers endured by the early explorers and settlers; the years of back-breaking work to build the foundations of urban and rural life. … The idea that other peoples, who had taken no part in these pioneering efforts, might simply arrive in large numbers to exploit important local resources, or to take advantage of these earlier settlement efforts, was anathema.[v]     

Tied in with these natural and legitimate expressions of racial and ethnic solidarity, were concerns hordes of non-White immigrants would drive down the wages and living standards of White Australians. This was a key part of the original rationale for the White Australia policy as articulated by Alfred Deakin, Australia’s first Attorney-General, who argued that

a white Australia does not by any means just mean the preservation of the complexion of the people of this country. It means the multiplying of homes, so that we may be able to defend every part of our continent; it means the maintenance of conditions of life fit for white men and white women; it means equal laws and opportunities for all; it means protection against underpaid labour of other lands, it means the payment of fair wages. A white Australia means a civilisation whose foundations are built on healthy lives, lived in honest toil, under circumstances which imply no degradation; a white Australia means protection.”[vi]  

An analogous view had been expressed as early as 1841 by James Stephen, the powerful head of the British colonial office in London, who declared that Australia should be a land “where the English race shall be spread from sea to sea unmixed with any lower caste.” He maintained that the introduction of Indian “coolies” into New South Wales would “debase by their intermixture the noble European race… bring with them the idolatry and debasing habits of their country… beat down the wages of poor laboring Europeans… [and] cut off the resource for many of our own distressed people.”[vii] Charles Pearson, a British scholar who migrated to the colonies in the late nineteenth century, published a book entitled National Life and Character in 1893. In it, he described Australia as “an unexampled instance of a great continent that has been left for the first civilized people that found it to take and occupy. He warned, nevertheless, that it was still questionable whether the white races would be able to hold on to it in the face of the Asiatic threat:

We know that coloured and white labour cannot exist side by side; we are well aware that China can swamp us with a single year’s surplus of population; and we know that if national existence is sacrificed to the working of a few mines and sugar plantations, it is not the Englishman and Australian alone, but the whole civilized world, that will be the losers.[viii]

Such concerns echoed through the decades of the White Australia policy, where the country explicitly defined its nationhood in terms of Whiteness and a policy of economic protectionism designed to benefit the entire group by preventing, say, Australian capitalists from importing cheap labor that would undercut the standard of living of other White Australians. The policy reflected the desire of Australians to build a strong and prosperous society founded upon the principles of racial and cultural homogeneity and fairness within the racial group. Gwenda Tavan notes that the White Australia policy was a “morally imbued affirmation of the type of society Australians wanted to build: white and British-Australian as well as cohesive, conformist, liberal-democratic and egalitarian.”[ix] One commentator reflected this view when noting in 1939 that “The Australian prides himself on his high standard of living; he wishes to do nothing that will endanger it. Neither does he wish to bring into being a colour problem such as he sees in South Africa.”[x]

 

Early twentieth century Australian poster

Rather than being driven by any shift in public opinion, the impetus for the progressive dismantling of the White Australia policy, and the move from assimilation to multiculturalism between 1966 and 1975 came “from a small group of reformers that began appearing in some Australian universities in the 1960s” who, like their counterparts in the United States and Britain, soon comprised a hostile intellectual, academic and media elite who “developed a sense of being a member of a morally and intellectually superior ingroup battling against Australian parochial non-intellectuals as an outgroup.”[xi] In the changing ideological climate of the 1950s and 1960s, the moral foundations of Australia’s British history were subjected to radical criticism, and once foundational patriotic works like Keith Hancock’s Australia (with its maxim that “among the Australians pride of race counted for more than love of country”) were no longer compulsory reading for students. [xii]

Boasian anthropology and the fall of White Australia

The Boasian ideology of racial egalitarianism (discussed in Chapter 2 of The Culture of Critique as a Jewish intellectual movement) was a critical weapon in opening Australian immigration up to non-White groups. Jewish academic Jon Stratton notes that the dismantling of the White Australia policy and the ultimate adoption of multiculturalism was a direct result of “internal and external pressures related to a general turning away from biological racialism.”[xiii] The Australian Jewish academic Andrew Markus articulates the standard critique of “white racism” that became prominent in the 1960s when he asserts that it was based on the notion that

(i) as a result of some (undefined) “natural” process, national groups (or ‘races’ or ‘cultures’) have inborn (‘essential’) qualities which will never alter; and (ii) there are inherent characteristics in such groups which interpose barriers against harmonious co-existence, not least against interbreeding of populations. Such ideas give rise to closed forms of nationalism which restrict membership to those qualified by birth or descent, in contrast to open forms which grant citizenship to individuals on the basis of residence and adherence to the governing principles of the nation. They justified European colonial rule; the denial of basic human rights and citizenship; segregation in the workplace, housing and education; and policies of genocide culminating in the “factories of death” established in the period of Nazi domination of continental Europe. Rarely challenged in western societies prior to 1940, the idea of biological racial difference lost much of its legitimacy in the aftermath of the Holocaust.[xiv]

It is obvious from this statement just how closely acceptance of the myth of racial equality from the 1960s onwards was bound up with Jewish post-Holocaust ethno-political activism. Note also the outright lies and hypocrisy in the above paragraph. The “(undefined) ‘natural’ process” that Markus claims is the wholly irrational basis for “racism” is the very well-defined process of human evolution itself. The differential evolution of human groups in response to selection pressures imposed by diverse environments, resulted, after thousands of years, in differences in external morphology and psychological traits—including intelligence as measured by IQ tests. The average intelligence of a group will profoundly influence the society that will be created by that group. There is nothing undefined, irrational, or pseudo-scientific about this whatsoever.

Professor Andrew Markus: Propagating “noble lies”

In his description of “closed” forms of nationalism which restrict “membership to those qualified by birth or descent” Markus could be describing traditional Judaism, with its strict endogamy and built-in assumptions of Jewish racial, intellectual and moral superiority. As always, however, Judaism is outside the critical frame of reference of such reflexively anti-White Jewish intellectuals. Jewish ethno-nationalism (exemplified in Israel’s racially restrictive immigration laws) is tacitly held to be legitimate and uncontroversial (indeed a moral imperative), while White nationalism is inherently illegitimate and morally corrupt.

The rampant hypocrisy of this is particularly striking given that Australian Jews have “been at the forefront of support for the right of the state of Israel to exist as a Jewish state, to determine its own security agenda, and to do what is needed to ensure its own survival.”[xv]  Indeed, the academic and Australian Jewish activist Danny Ben Moshe points out that Australian Jewry is fiercely Zionist and “outdoes all other Diasporas in their commitment to Israel.” A 1993 survey of Melbourne Jewry found that 63 per cent had visited Israel with over 40 per cent having done so two or more times. This is compared with 36 per cent of American Jews. Australia also has the highest rate of aliyah in the world.[xvi] While strongly in favor of non-White immigration and racial-mixing among the non-Jews in Australia, a publication like the Australian Jewish News can openly express the view that for Jews, “Intermarriage has always been and will always be an individual, spiritual and communal tragedy. No amount of petty rationalising will ever change that.”[xvii]

Noting the incredible hypocrisy involved in simultaneously condemning white racialism while defending the Jewish ethno-nationalist state of Israel (and traditional Jewish prohibitions against intermarriage), Kevin MacDonald observes in The Culture of Critique that:

Ironically, many intellectuals who absolutely reject evolutionary thinking and any imputation that genetic self-interest might be important in human affairs also favor policies that are rather self-interestedly ethnocentric, and they often condemn the self-interested ethnocentric behavior of other groups, particularly any indication that the European-derived majority… is developing a cohesive group strategy and high levels of ethnocentrism in reaction to the groups strategies of others. …  A Jew maintaining this argument should, to retain intellectual consistency, agree that the traditional Jewish concern with endogamy and consanguinity has been irrational. Moreover, such a person would also believe that Jews ought not attempt to retain political power in Israel because there is no rational reason to suppose that any particular group should have power anywhere. Nor should Jews attempt to influence the political process … in such a manner as to disadvantage another group or benefit their own. And to be logically consistent, one should also apply this argument to all those who promote immigration of their own ethnic groups, the mirror image of group-based opposition to such immigration.[xviii]  

Since the academic world is international and hierarchical, it was inevitable that intellectual movements originating in elite American universities spread throughout the West (see “Liberal Bias in Academia: The role of Jewish academics in the creation and maintenance of academic liberalism“) As a consequence of the growing influence of the Jewish intellectual movements described in The Culture of Critique, and direct Jewish activism in Australia, “Such views [i.e. the assumption racial equality] became standard within schools and universities and provided the intellectual basis for campaigns against racial discrimination in the late 1950s and 1960s.”[xix] Tavan notes that: “As a result of these shifts, universities in particular became ‘hotbeds of resistance’ to White Australia during the late 1950s and early 1960s. … The emergence of a body of Marxist-inspired social theory in Europe and the United States at that time also reinvigorated radical left-wing political theory in Australia.” For Tavan, the new critical theory of the Frankfurt School “played a crucial role in exposing the racist underpinnings of many of Australia’s key institutions and values.”[xx] The Frankfurt School abandoned the White working class because they were insufficiently radical and had succumbed to fascism in Germany and Italy. This caused them to reject the orthodox Marxist emphasis on class struggle, replacing it by advocating non-White immigration and multiculturalism, as well as recruiting Whites who had complaints against the traditional culture, particularly feminists and sexual minorities, into a new coalition of the left.

With the adoption in 1963 of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, member governments were urged to eliminate racial discrimination from their society altogether. Internal intellectual currents were thus augmented by mounting external political opposition to the White Australia policy, especially during the years of European decolonization in Africa and Asia. Eric Richards notes how

Prime Minister Menzies [1949-1966] was increasingly vexed by the intrusion of racial and immigration issues at meetings of Commonwealth Heads of Government. Menzies (and even more vehemently, one of his successors, John Gorton) loathed the way in which he was lectured on the “principle of racial equality” by newcomer members of the Commonwealth. Menzies and Gorton [1968-1971] believed that Australia’s immigration policy was perfectly defensible and, in any case, none of their business. But the die was already cast. Australia in the 1960s felt pressure from within and from beyond, and its immigration policy was a growing embarrassment.[xxi]    

Senior Australian public servants serving on a committee formed to respond to the changed situation agreed in 1964 that “there was an urgent need to remove, as far as practicable, instances of racial discrimination in Australia in order to ensure Australia’s international reputation and influence are not to be seriously endangered.”[xxii] In response to these internal and external pressures, the administrative apparatus of the White Australia policy was gradually dismantled from the mid-1960s, until, in 1974, the then Labor Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam (1972-1975), declared in a speech that: “On Immigration, we have removed the last remaining pieces of legislation which could be described as discriminatory on racial grounds.”[xxiii]

According to the Australian academic and multicultural activist Bronwyn Hinz, this policy change merely formalized shifts in policy approach that had begun in the 1960s in response to reforms to the United States migration policy.[xxiv] Richards observes that this “hesitating shift towards a non-discriminatory Australia” triggered “a social and demographic revolution” in Australia[xxv] In both America and Australia, Jewish intellectual movements and political activism were pivotal in driving this revolution. The national editor of the Australian Jewish News, Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges this, noting that: “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.” The exact nature of this crusade will be explored in subsequent parts of this essay. 

Source Article & References

Part 2 of 5 – The History of Judaism in Australia –

Part 3 of 5 – Walter Lippmann – The Jewish architect of Australian Multiculturalism

Part 4 of 5 – Opposition to multiculturalism in Australia and the Jewish response

Part 5 of 5 – Jewish anti-White activism and Australia’s Aborigines

An absolutely irrefutable, superb series of articles proving why we say it’s the Jews behind our “multicultural” woes in Australia.

– BDL1983

Who “kicked-off” the modern Western Terrorism Paradigm in 2001?

911mossad

All we ever hear about these days is the threat of “terrorism” from ISIS, so it seems appropriate to once again reinforce the fact that it was JEWS who did 9-11 and “kicked-off” the modern western terrorism paradigm, NOT MUSLIMS:

And in case anyone is unaware, all of those supposed beheadings of western journalists by ISIS militants are fake. It is exactly the same sort of crap the Jews sold us with the Osama Bin Laden videos, aka Mossad playing dress-ups, and the fake WMD’s. It’s all bullshit to brainwash us into accepting the latest Jewish war by “involving us” in some way.

Don’t get me wrong here – I’m not saying ISIS aren’t a brutal bunch of murdering bastards – They are. They’re absolute scum, just like the Jews who are bankrolling them!

How’s this for prophesy then:

As for ISIS, I like my description from an older article:

The so-called “ISIS crisis” created by Islamic militants to establish an “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria” is nothing more than a Jew-controlled and funded operation for them to further their aims in the middle-east, using Islamic fighters to do the dirty work. They came from nowhere and were instantly a well coordinated organisation – this sort of thing doesn’t happen without Jewish money, and especially not among unsophisticated Arabs! The idea is if they can destabilize the region further and take Syria and Iraq into the Jewish-controlled ISIS net, then they move another step closer to establishing their “Greater Israel“. We mustn’t forget that the Jews haven’t yet succeeded in getting rid of Bashar al-Assad and his regime, so if they can use ISIS to get rid of Assad, then they probably will.

I should also add that whilst ISIS is a Jew funded operation, this doesn’t mean that the Islamic mongrels fighting for it aren’t genuine… It’s just that they don’t know they are doing the Jews dirty work! Oy Vey, who’d ‘av thunk it?

– BDL1983

10 Hard Facts About the Holocaust

Video found at Hardon’s Blog.

As boring as it is to rehash and endlessly crap on about how the Holocaust is a hoax, it must still be repeated continually until a critical mass of people “get it”!

Why? 

Because the Holocaust is the reason they say we must accept the current status quo! Without the Holocaust as the number one Jewish propaganda weapon, their power base begins to crumble. Take the Holocaust weapon away from the Jews and people will eventually see these evil demonic bastards for what they are….

If you don’t want to know the facts, then shut the fuck up.

You can’t say you weren’t warned. 

– BDL1983

The Holocaust Hoax and the Jewish Promotion of Perversity

From The End Of Zion:

PornoHolocaust

We have fallen a long way in the last few decades, in regard to the filth that is allowed in our society. What happened?

If anything you would think that the Jews would be thanking us for defeating the Germans and liberating the millions of the so-called ‘survivors’ from the so-called ‘Nazi death camps.’ That’s not how they operate though.  They believe that there is a hatred for them that lies somewhere in all gentiles and that we can begin Holocausting them out of nowhere at any time.

This constant state of paranoia that the Jews live in is exacerbated by the fact that they ruthlessly exploit any society they are allowed to live in. Just simply allowing people to know the truth about their behavior is enough to guarantee their deportation to Israel at the very least, so they are forced to lie and suppress the truth constantly. This reality causes them to harbor a burning hatred and fanatical aggression toward all non-Jews.

The only way for the Jews to quell this fear of the gentiles turning on them is by completely neutralizing and weakening us so as to make an organized resistance, as what happened in 1930s Germany, impossible.

The promotion of sexual perversion, pornography and obscenity is one of the biggest weapons in the Jews’ arsenal for achieving this aim. The deliberate moral corruption of society can thus be seen as a preventative measure against a potential future Holocaust. The more people are masturbating and thinking about sex, the less they are thinking about what the Jews are doing—much less organizing to fight against them.

B7C7D7D33

This makes the Jews nervous.

pic_1527

This doesn’t.

Sexual immorality weakens a nation in many ways, not the least of which is by breaking down the nuclear family. The use of pornography, in particular, is very harmful to men. It strips them of their masculinity and makes them docile, weak and apathetic.

An overt example of how the Jews have purposely used pornography as a weapon to destabilize an enemy is when Israeli soldiers took over Palestinian TV stations in 2002 and immediately started broadcasting porn over the airwaves. Professor E. Michael Jones wrote about this:

“The Israelis have recently shown themselves well-versed in what one could call the military use of pornography. At 4:30 PM on March 30, 2002, Israeli military forces took over Palestinian TV stations when they occupied Ramallah in the West Bank, immediately shutting them down. What followed was a little more unusual. Shortly after occupying the Al-Watan TV station, the Israeli forces began broadcasting pornography over its transmitter. Eventually, according to a report from The Advertiser, an Australian newspaper, the Israelis expanded their cultural offensive against the Palestinian people by broadcasting pornography over two other Palestinian stations, the Ammwaj and Al-Sharaq channels. One 52-year-old Palestinian mother of three children, according to the report in The Advertiser, complained about ‘the deliberate psychological damage caused by these broadcasts.‘”

Jews view White people in the West as every bit of an enemy to them as the Palestinian Arabs in the Middle East. Injecting pornography into Western culture had to be done through a much less overt process than what had been done in Palestine though, as their war against the West has been a subversive one, rather than a military one.

To read the full article, click below. Leave comments at EOZ (they’re closed here anyway!)

EndOfZion

New Migrants and Homegrown Jihadists

More insanity from our wonderful Jew-loving government, as usual…..

From Adelaide Now:

Jihad

Scumbags

DON’T migrate to Australia unless you want to join “Team Australia” Tony Abbott has declared, ahead of his meetings with Muslim leaders this week.

The Prime Minister will sit down with community heads in Sydney today in a bid to allay fears about the recently announced beefed up counter-terror laws.

We’ve got a serious problem of radicalised people going to the Middle East to fight with terrorist groups,” Mr Abbott told 2GB Radio this morning.

“Some of them will want to come back to Australia and they do pose a risk if they do, because they’ve been radicalised, militarised and brutalised by the experience.”

The Prime Minister said about two-thirds of people who returned from Afghanistan went on to be involved in “home-grown terrorist plotting”.

“So we do have to be vigilant against it, and my position is that everyone has got to be on Team Australia,” he said.

“Everyone has got to put this country, its interests, its values and its people first, and you don’t migrate to this country unless you want to join our team and that’s the point I’ll be stressing.”

Mr Abbott, who has recently announced beefed up counter-terrorism laws, urged the “moderate mainstream” to speak out.

Read More

We sure do live in a world gone totally insane. Common sense and logical reasoning have been thrown out the window, especially in the corridors of power! Tony “Wingnut” Abbott clearly likes making his job as difficult as possible, but then again he has to, because that’s the agenda his Jew masters insist he carry out.

Let’s think this through logically:

Tony Abbott wants everyone to join “Team Australia“. Meanwhile, we are fighting wars on behalf of World Jewry in the mid-east. This means that we are aiding the process of radicalizing Islamic Jihadist fighters. Now clearly anyone with half a brain can tell that inviting these radical Islamic nutters into the fray of “Team Australia” and expecting “Team Australia” to unite as a team is a complete idiot!

The scenario here is akin to inviting in the disgruntled/displaced people of a country you are at war with and expecting them to all of a sudden love your country. We’re at war with these supposedly evil terrorists on one hand, then on the other it’s the all-inclusive multicultural Jew Marxist attitude of “come on in, we’re all the same after all“! I mean, what the hell – let’s do something insane like allow our evil enemies in, then tell them in some pathetic manner that they must abandon Islamic Jihad and join “Team Australia” – yeah Tony, they’re really going to listen to you!

This also begs the question – if you were really concerned about “Islamic Terrorism”, like our Jew controlled government pretends to be, then you would shut the borders immediately, right? That would be the common sense response to such a threat. The reality is of course that what people know as “Islamic Terrorism” is really Jewish terrorism. What I’m referring to here is the “9-11, 7-7 style” coordinated Jew Mossad false-flag jobs. Any example of a big slick TV-style “terrorist attack” is always a Jew operation, whereas the real deal with “Islamic Terrorism” is that it’s more like a bunch of guerilla fighters gunning for Jihad, than anything else. (Click the link above for an example of Jihadist terrorism. I know ISIS is a Jew-funded operation, but the Islamist bastards are still showing their style here… sickening)

White, or very nearly white Jihadist Robert Cerantonio

White, or very nearly white Jihadist Robert Cerantonio

Finally, something a little bit weird that I feel like mentioning. In this article here we see an extreme Jihadist keeping strange company:

AUSTRALIAN men as young as 16 are feared to be among the followers of extremist Robert “Musa” Cerantonio.

An expert believes an 18-year-old suicide bomber from Melbourne, who killed five people in Iraq last week, would have been spurred on by the jihadist’s online posts.

Mr Cerantonio arrived at Melbourne Airport on Wednesday after he was deported from the Philippines for having an invalid visa.

Australian Federal Police officers told him on arrival that he would be watched.

It is understood he was taken to stay with his Catholic family, who would not respond to the Herald Sun.

Read More

What the hell is an alleged Islamic Jihad extremist doing staying with his Catholic family? Wouldn’t you think he’d have disowned them long ago if he were anywhere near as extreme as they say he is? It all seems a bit strange to me…… I thought this oddity was worth a mention anyway.

The bottom-line is that we need to be rid of Jews AND Muslims in both their racial AND “religious” incarnations. All they equal is trouble, and nothing good will ever become of these scumbags, mark my words!

– BDL1983

Living The Dream!!

With so much shit going on around the world, sometimes it’s extremely refreshing to just forget about it for an afternoon!

These clips should make any half-way normal person feel better. Listen to them loudly and get yourself a fucking beer (or stout if you’re in the southern hemisphere), and enjoy refreshing your soul! John Fogerty is brilliant in these live recordings.

Note: some fuckarse disabled the thing where you can watch the video outside JewTube. What a fucking idiot thing to do eh..? Oh well, I’m sure we can all manage to click the appropriate link to watch the associated video!!! Haha. If not, you don’t deserve to watch it!!

Delicious Coopers Stout! And yes, I've had more than the safe amount of alcohol no doubt, but I don't give a fuck about that!!

Delicious Coopers Stout! And yes, I’ve had more than the safe amount of alcohol no doubt, but I don’t give a fuck!! It’s nice and I’ll live longer than all these fucking teetotalers anyway, don’t you worry about that!!

The magazine sitting there on the bar is the “Homebrewer” which is another project I’m extremely interested in because beer is a holy fluid to me!! If you can make it yourself then life makes sense!!

Note the fierce warrior cat in the background. He lunged at me the other night and nearly tore half my fucking leg off by the way. He’s more dangerous than what you might think!

WFall

Been trekking today and this is the waterfall at the bottom of the track. It’s a fucking beautiful place to do a good workout!

Here’s another picture of the scenery around my trekking spot:

AHForestRange

If you’re wondering why I’m posting this, then here’s the reason: because everything in this post is stuff that I like! You have to be a human sometimes and forget the Jew for a bit, otherwise his destructive ways and negativity will drag you down. You know what I think – fuck the Jew, he’s not going to stop me enjoying things!

This is also a great song and Willie Nelson is a classic. Apparently he wants to be rolled up and smoked when he dies! Hahaha, funny shit:

If you don’t like this post then please fuck off because I’m done with miserable bastards.

Oh, and how could I forget this song? It’s such a great film clip:

– BDL1983

Nature Versus Nurture – How the Jews Lie to You

We’ve all heard the old argument of Nature versus Nurture – Race versus Environment. It’s a valid and relevant argument to have. The problem is that, like everything else, the Jews have injected their poison into it.

no-jews-allowed

The prevailing ideology of today, used by Jews and their liberal lackeys in academia, is that there is no such thing as race and even if there is, then it is due to environmental factors alone. For the Jew, as the eternal racial-integrationalist of the west, there simply cannot be any such thing as real racial differences, otherwise we have a clear and logical reason to live separate of other races. The Jewish motivation is obvious: they want white people to racially mix themselves out of existence, so they target our countries for integration/ multiculturalism, while they don’t really care about the non-white countries because they pose no threat to Jewish plans of world domination. One of the original proponents of the “no such thing as race” idea was the Jew Franz Boaz, and you better believe it – the Jews in academia and their lackeys latched onto this “theory”! It has been turned into a modern Jewish form of racial “gospel” where if you disagree with it, then you are an evil racist.

Franz "Oy Vey" Boaz

Franz “Oy Vey” Boaz

Anyway, here’s a bit of crap from Jew Franz Boaz’s wikipedia article showing how this “groundbreaking” Jew miraculously disproved everything anyone had said before about the obvious biological and scientific truth of race:

In a series of groundbreaking studies of skeletal anatomy he showed that cranial shape and size was highly malleable depending on environmental factors such as health and nutrition, in contrast to the claims by racial anthropologists of the day that held head shape to be a stable racial trait. Boas also worked to demonstrate that differences in human behavior are not primarily determined by innate biological dispositions, but are largely the result of cultural differences acquired through social learning. In this way, Boas introduced culture as the primary concept for describing differences in behavior between human groups, and as the central analytical concept of anthropology.

So basically, health and nutrition is why my skull shape and physique is White Nordic European, but I could have acquired a Negro shaped skull through different health and nutritional practices?

What an absolute load of shit!

Maybe if I eat some of this I'll turn into a Jew?!!!!

Maybe if I eat some of this I’ll turn into a Jew?!!!!

If skull shape is so malleable then why do we see such obvious consistency of skull shape in one race and a completely different shape in another race?

Answer – the other racial anthropologists of Boaz’s day were correct – head shape is a stable racial trait – and Boaz is a lying Jew!

Different races are anthropologically different. Funny how no-one denies this obvious fact when it comes to animal species and sub-groups!

Different races are anthropologically different. Funny how no-one denies this obvious fact when it comes to animal species and sub-groups!

If head shape were not a stable trait, then no racial identification could be made from ancient burial sites. Do we see confusion here?

No, not a bit. Any anthropologist could identify the race of the person by skull shape in no time! It deserves repeating: Boaz is a lying Jew and a contributor of nothing but deception to the field of racial science and anthropology!

The same bullshit Jewish lying continues today with the likes of Jared Diamond promoting all the same propaganda about race not existing and environment/nurture being the only factor responsible for different achievements among different human populations.

Do you think there are any biological/racial factors involved here:

Picture 1

Picture 1

Picture 2

Picture 2

I shouldn’t really have to answer the above question, but seriously – if someone showed you pictures of leopards, lions, and tigers and told you that they were biologically the same and it was only the environment that made them different; would you believe them? Of course not, and that’s because it’s bullshit.

Boaz and Diamond are Jewish bullshit artists to state the bleeding obvious!

Anyway, enough of the Jewish liars for now. Let’s be honest and analyse this rationally. Is it Race or is it Nurture? Clearly it’s both and anyone with common sense will understand what I’m talking about here:

1.) Take any homogeneous racial group, divide it up, and place all the different groups in the same environment. What would you logically expect? Same race, same environment, equals very similar outcome, pretty much the same.

2.) Take any homogeneous racial group, divide it up, and place all the different groups in different environments. What would you logically expect? Same race, different environment, equals an outwardly different outcome, but with inner similarities bound uniquely to the biological character of the unique racial group involved. This is exactly the reason why when you look at the achievements of the white race in all different environments (mid-east, Europe, Africa) you see progressive, inventive, and creative civilizations. It is also exactly the same reason why if you look to see what the black races have achieved, no matter what environment they are in, there is absolutely nothing of note beyond primitive savage tribal life. No civilization to speak of. No creative ability whatsoever.

3.) Take several different racial groups, keep them divided, and place them in the same environment, although separate obviously. What would you logically expect? Different race, same environment, equals different outcome. The easiest case example here is the African continent. Everywhere whites colonized we saw advanced, progressive, inventive civilizations popping up. Meanwhile the black races achieved nothing. There is no blaming the environment in this case because it is the same. It is 100% clear and obvious why the two races behaved completely different to each other, despite very similar environmental conditions – because the races are biologically and fundamentally different in nature! The Jews will say that whites were oppressing the blacks, but we know this is bullshit because the blacks were doing nothing before the white man appeared anyway!

4.) Different racial groups in different environments; this needs no explanation.

That’s it in a nutshell. I’ll leave it up to the reader to argue with others about the percentages of Race versus Environment, but I’ll tell you one thing that is clear: Race is a huge factor in this argument. Environment is definitely an important factor, but Race is the ultimate key factor to understanding not only this question, but understanding history. All of a sudden, history and everything occurring around you makes perfect sense when you understand Race!

Now that the argument of Race/Nature versus Environment/Nurture is all cleared up, we might like to see what a former Prime Minister of Britain said about race, and this man just so happened to be a Jew.

Benjamin Disraeli, Jewish British PM - 1868 & 1874-80.

Benjamin Disraeli, Jewish British PM – 1868 & 1874-80.

Take it away Mr Benjamin Disraeli:

“No one may be indifferent to the racial principle, the racial question. It is the key to world history. History is often confusing because it is written by people who did not understand the racial question and the aspects relevant to it… Race is everything, and every race that does not keep its blood from being mixed will perish. . . Language and religion do not determine a race–blood determines it.”

I don’t care that a Jew said that quote. It is still true and always will be. Besides, Jews don’t tell the truth very often, so make the most of it!!

An interesting point to finish with here is the fact that there has never been any such thing as a racially pure Jew. They have always been of a mixed-race stock which can probably be better described as a breed – in the Jews case – a Satanic breed.

What’s the natural reaction of an impure breed of human to one which is racially pure? An inbuilt instinct to destroy – that’s what. I think this is a major motivation of the Jew to encourage racial inter-mixture, because it drags everyone else down to their level. We should bear in mind that the Jew is not preserving his racial purity by mixing mainly with others of Jewish lineage. No, he is only preserving his “breed” and it’s virus-like characteristics.

Race is the truth.

Blood is what matters.

Stand up for your race.

Or die out.

– BDL1983

The Jewish Vampire Will Fall!

One day this sort of attitude will be widespread:

Not yet though.

The worldwide Jewish vampire system is gradually self-destructing. The more problems he creates, the closer he edges towards his prophesied destruction. We certainly can’t take down the system of the beast as it stands now – it’s still way too strong. The time for the Jews overthrow is growing ever nearer though, and we will instinctively know when the time is right!

Until then, we must stay strong, stay true, spread the right message, and get as many people on our side as we can.

– BDL1983