Tag: United Nations

The Great Global Warming Swindle (It’s a hoax!)

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbAKkMfMjpg&w=640&h=360]

The video above should demolish any belief anyone may have in the man-made, CO2, Global Warming/Climate Change hoax. The lies of the IPCC (branch of the U.N.) are clearly exposed. Basically, the IPCC’s job is to get sell-out ‘scientists‘ to find any variance in temperature, anywhere in the world, and then blame it on CO2 emissions. As you’ll see, the IPCC and the U.N. are completely full of shit!

The video below takes bits and pieces of the ‘Great Global Warming Swindle’ documentary, and shows how the bullshit ‘greenie‘ agenda fits into the Jew World Order agenda. They don’t mention the Jews though. It’s the New World Order to them………. Whatever.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFZv90oHO1E&w=640&h=360]

Related articles from this site:

Climate Change is a Jewish Hoax

Religious Leaders Unite on Climate

John Friend’s Interview with Dr. Eric Karlstrom

This should be enough information for any reasonably intelligent person to see that human-induced ‘Global Warming’ is complete & utter bollocks!

– BDL1983

A Couple of Radio Shows Well-Worth the Listen:

First up, John Friend’s interview with Dr. Eric Karlstrom. This man knows his stuff regarding the whole issue of ‘Global Warming‘, or ‘Climate Change‘ (Climate Change is what the so-called experts label it, when unsure if temperatures are going up or down).

CO2 SCAM

The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), is a branch of the United Nations, and therefore a political organisation. The UN and the Oil companies are controlled by Jews. Since Kikes are pushing BOTH sides of this agenda, then obviously one side must be wrong. The way you tell is by the evidence and the labelling of the nay-sayers. On the Al Gore, TV, UN side, there is no evidence other than fearmongering propaganda. On the other side, there is a mountain of evidence suggesting that the man-made CO2, ‘Global Warming’ theory is a load of bullshit, and the epithet of ‘Climate Change DENIER‘ being thrown at those who doubt the UN’s bogus claims!

Holocaust = Hoax, therefore ‘Holocaust Denier’ is the smear term used against those who question.

Climate Change = Hoax, therefore ‘Climate Change Denier’ is the smear term used against those who question.

You do the mathematics.

It’s purpose is to sell the idea that humans are destroying the planet by pumping too much life-giving CO2 into the atmosphere, and catastrophically warming things up. It is just a guilt-trip used on ‘White’ countries to con us into paying ‘carbon’ taxes, where they can go, “Look, too much of a carbon footprint here, let’s cut back on resource use in the WHITE countries, because Whitey ‘pollutes’ too much, then pretend to use our carbon offsets to help starving Africans”. All the while, Mr. Jew just pockets the money anyway, because all the ‘developing’ countries are already in huge debt! Mr. Jew only wants to use this issue to lower our White living standards, as he simultaneously ‘multiculturalises’ us!

White Nationalists: Pay Attention, this is the TRUTH!

Older article about Jew Climate scam

Also, listen to this show with Kyle Hunt interviewing Thomas Goodrich. It’s all about the disgusting Jew-led WAR CRIMES against Germany; mass rape, murder, torture etc….. Truly horrible stuff that SHOULD BE COMMON KNOWLEDGE AMONGST EVERYONE! It is a very significant event in our history, illustrating what these filthy, disgusting, fucking kikes have done to our race….. (and are perfectly capable of repeating, if given the chance)

Older article about what the filthy Jews did to the Germans

That’s all.

– Brett

Syria: A catastrophe in the making, by Lasha Darkmoon

Syria lies waiting, exposed and vulnerable.
When will the vultures move in for kill?

syria-attack

The Syrian situation changes by the hour. Writing about it can be a frustrating task, for almost everything one says about it has to be modified later as new events occur. This is where we stand right now:

The UK and France have backed out of joining the US in its plan to attack Syria. They say they want to wait for more evidence of Syrian “wrongdoing”. They point out that they will feel happier about attacking Syria if and when the UN chemical inspectors in Syria have completed their report. The US, which has already made up its mind that the Assad government is guilty, is apparently not interested in “evidence of guilt”. It is now determined to “go it alone.”

A barrage of missiles fired at regime targets from the sea appears to be the most likely option. These include the Presidential palace, Military intelligence, the National Security HQ, the Ministry of Defense, Parliament, and the Central bank. The regime’s greatest strength, its elite forces, foremost among which is the 4th armored division, will have to be taken out. Syria’s substantial air defenses, which include multiple arrays of Russian-made missiles, will also have to be destroyed.

If stockpiles of chemical weapons are hit in the punitive process, deadly neurotoxins will be released over a wide region, causing huge numbers of deaths among civilians. Far more innocent people are likely to die at America’s hands than were killed in recent chemical attacks laid to Assad’s account.

Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, warned the West of “extremely dangerous consequences”, and went on to add that “using force without the approval of the UN Security Council is a very grave violation of international law.”

Russia does not wish to get involved in any future conflict, Lavrov hinted, but the implication was that Russia might have to get involved if Mad Dog America went too far—for example, by killing Russian advisers, many of whom are to be found in Syria right now. Any attack on Russian ships in the region, moreover, could lead to only one outcome: World War III.

The Obama administration has rejected seeking Congressional approval for its planned attack on Syria, doubtless afraid that the US Congress will strongly disapprove of its headlong rush into “a totally unapproved, extralegal war.”

For the same reason, the US government has ordered the UN inspectors to leave Syria at once, without completing their report, “apparently hoping to avoid the report proving them wrong and throwing a monkey wrench into the war scheme.”

The UN inspectors will be forced to leave Syria today (Saturday, August 31) before completing their investigation satisfactorily.

The UN inspectors’ report is in any case a red herring.

All the participants know very well that the inspectors’ mandate is simply to ascertain if a chemical attack actually took place, not to point the finger of blame at any particular party.

♣

The chemical attack in Syria, which has reportedly claimed the lives of 322 civilians, has been described by US secretary of state John Kerry as a “moral obscenity”.

The American-backed military dictatorship in Egypt, however, killed 1,295 innocent civilians in a two-day period. Did America protest? On the contrary, they backed the carnage there. And Kerry even went so far as to make the fatuous comment that the military dictatorship, which had just ousted a democratically elected government, was doing its best to “restore democracy.” (Seumas Milne, The Guardian, 28 August, “An attack on Syria will only spread the war and killing”).

To paraphrase an excellent point made by Paul Craig Roberts here: one reason for the rush to war is to prevent the UN inspectors coming up with a contradictory report, thus disproving Washington’s unsubstantiated claim that Assad was responsible for killing his own people with nerve gas. This would only serve to underline the fact that Washington was itself responsible for a false flag attack against Syria, carried out by its own hired terrorists known as “the Syrian rebels.”

This disreputable bunch of jihadis, including remnants of Al Qaeda, are arguably the ones responsible for herding a large number of children into one place and then gassing them to death—the blame then being pinned on the Syrian government by Washington.

NWS_20130823_IME_022_28687752_I1

Syrian children probably killed by the Syrian “rebels” with chemical weapons given to them by Israel. So think many respected commentators like George Galloway. (See here). Others believe that the chemical weapons came from the Saudis, but then who gave the Saudis the chemical weapons? No gold stars for guessing that.

♣

The planned attack on Syria will be America’s ninth military intervention in a Muslim country in 15 years. These are eight other Muslim countries America has attacked under the pretence that it wants peace with the world: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, Mali, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan. After it has attacked Syria, at the bidding of its Zionist master, America then intends to round off its  “peace mission” by destroying Iran.

America is one of those countries constantly looking for pretexts to attack other sovereign states, usually democratic ones, in the interests of its Zionist master; and if there are no pretexts for war, it will invent pretexts—and then fabricate the evidence to justify its belligerence. It did this in Vietnam with the Gulf of Tonkin incident; and it did so again to spectacular effect in Iraq, inventing imaginary weapons of mass destruction which could apparently reach London in 45 minutes.

In retaliation for an alleged Al Qaeda attack, America bombed a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan, killing and wounding scores of innocent Sudanese civilians. America doesn’t seem to care who it kills. Its latest “hate affair” with Syria is a case in point. Should America wait for the UN inspectors to gather their evidence and present a full report? Good heavens, no! Why bother?  Bomb first, ask questions later!

The use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime is, according to US Secretary of State John Kerry, a “moral obscenity“, but the infinitely more lethal deployment of nuclear weapons by America and Israel is evidently not.

While we don’t know for sure that Assad has used chemical weapons—and the likelihood is that he has not—we do know for sure that America used atom bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Quite needlessly, as it turns out. Since the war was effectively over and Japan was only too anxious to surrender.

We also know for a fact that America has used vast quantities of depleted uranium in Iraq, causing monstrous birth deformities there, and that it has used white phosphorus and Agent Orange both in the Middle East and beyond.

It smacks of hypocrisy for America to scold Syria for its alleged use of chemical weapons. This is one pot that certainly can’t afford to call the kettle black.

Paul Craig Roberts again:

The corrupt British government has declared that Syria can be attacked without UN authorization, just as Serbia and Libya were militarily attacked without UN authorization. In other words, the Western democracies have already established precedents for violating international law. “International law? We don’t need no stinking international law!” The West knows only one rule: Might is Right. As long as the West has the Might, the West has the Right.

israelkilling32

This is what the US does almost every day of the week in “Afpak” (the region between Afghanistan and Pakistan) to Afghan and Pakistani civilians, mostly women and children, with its killer drones. It’s what the Israelis have been doing in Israel to the Palestinians for the last 65 years. These two nations that openly flout international law, America and Israel, have killed between them a thousand times—perhaps ten thousand times—more innocent civilians than Assad is alleged to have killed in recent chemical attacks.

♣

Read More: http://www.darkmoon.me/2013/syria-a-catastrophe-in-the-making-by-lasha-darkmoon/

More: http://www.dailystormer.com/syria-a-catastrophe-in-the-making/

Good article from Lasha Darkmoon.

– BDL1983

“Climate Change” is a Jewish Hoax!

climatechang-455x341

Here’s an article I wrote as a summary of a “Global Warming Hoax” DVD back in May 2009…

I was reading Mein Kampf for the first time back then and I was only a “beginner” on the Jewish Problem…….

– BDL1983

It is very important that the general public knows the truth behind this ‘Global Warming’ or ‘Climate Change’ scare. It is not a real environmental issue, but a very real political issue with huge implications for everyone on this planet if our so-called governments ‘act’ on it. After recently viewing a ‘Sovereignty International Environmental Perspectives Inc.’ production entitled ‘Global Warming or Global Governance’ (including snippets from the ‘Great Global Warming Swindle’ documentary), it is obvious for the good of humanity, that the powerful Global Warming lobby needs to be dealt a political death blow. Otherwise we must welcome multi-national corporate global enslavement, and the death of all national sovereignty. Sounds bad, it is! Here’s why:

The essence of the problem is summed up well by Dr. Vincent Gray, an Expert IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations body) Reviewer, Climate Consultant for New Zealand. He States, “The IPCC is a political organisation, set up by the UN, to provide evidence to support the framework convention on Climate Change, it’s been signed by governments, it’s entirely political”. Furthermore, “They made up what they were going to do beforehand and then chose whatever science they could find which they thought might support it, that’s my view”. On the government policies formulated from UN/IPCC findings he states, “Now, this summary for policy makers isn’t a summary for policy makers at all, it’s a summary by policy makers, in other words, it is a summary agreed line by line by government representatives”. Dr. Gray hits the nail on the head with these statements. This sums up the political process used by the IPCC, but what about the climate science and the media portrayal of this issue?

The controlled mass-media loves dramatizing this issue. Most often their examples supposedly linked to man-made global warming show floods, hurricanes, droughts, fires etc. You name it, it’ll be on the TV screen, in the paper, or on the net. Drama, Fear, Catastrophe, we should be scared because it’s our fault, or is it? They fail to mention that history shows natural catastrophes are more regular and dramatic in colder periods, not warmer ones. Anyone willing to do the research will find examples of natures’ fury throughout all history and that there has been no abnormal increase in natural disasters, but why not blame global warming for the disasters we do get? Seems to make people agree with the loony carbon dioxide idea!

Ian Clark, Professor of Earth Sciences at the University of Ottawa and director, G.G. Hatch Isotope Laboratories, one of Canada’s leading analytical facilities says, “In fact, there is no evidence of humans being the cause (of Climate Change), overwhelmingly it is the sun”. Even among IPCC reports they have not established greenhouse gasses as responsible for warming the earth.

Data and Consensus?

The misleading use of data is incredible. Al Gore is a liar who uses misleading graphs to convince uninformed crowds of his ‘inconvenient truth’, or should we say ‘convenient lie’! He shows two separate graphs asserting that the temperature graph follows the carbon dioxide graph, when in truth it is the carbon dioxide that follows temperature with about an 800 year lag. An important lesson in cause and effect, don’t you think Mr. Gore? Very hypocritical of Mr. Gore to preach to us to cut down on carbon emissions when in fact he uses seventeen times the energy of an average American! But he says he uses ‘green’ energy so it’s OK since the rich can afford it!

Al Gore LIAR!

The other piece of data these liars use is a discredited ‘hockey stick’ graph which shows temperature increases over the last thirty years or so. The ‘hockey stick’ data is contaminated by the Urban Heat Island effect as well as old unreliable measurements. Hot year 1998 is often thrown into the mix when discussing Global Warming and they conveniently forget that increased water vapour as a result of El Niño caused this one degree spike in temperatures. But it doesn’t end there; a look back thousands of years into earths’ history will reveal many warmer and cooler periods than today’s temperatures, and that the climatic conditions of today are nothing out of the ordinary.

And as for consensus? A 2003 Heartland Institute survey revealed 55.8% of scientists agree with the orthodox climate theory whilst 30% flatly disagreed. The reason for 55.8% agreeing is that without climate catastrophe, there is no government funding for them and they would have to look for a new job! To support this claim, John Christy, a Lead Author on the 2001 IPCC Report stated, “I was at the table with three Europeans having lunch and they were talking about their role as lead authors, they were talking about how they were trying to make the report so dramatic, that the US would have to sign up to the Kyoto Protocol”. This illustrates the attitude of those in the IPCC ‘agreeing’ with the Global Warming theory. Not to mention it was the same group of people pleading for funds by stoking up the ‘Global Cooling’ rubbish of the seventies!

Despite the fact that so-called ‘Climate Action’ groups are interested in getting carbon dioxide listed as an official pollutant, there have been many studies that reveal not only is carbon dioxide beneficial to plant life planet wide, but that carbon dioxide levels have been up to ten times more concentrated without any corresponding warming! Amazing! With more carbon dioxide, agriculture would thrive and world food production would soar. Climate scientist, Dr. Tim Patterson states, “Research has shown that an increase in carbon dioxide up to five times the current levels would not have a detrimental effect on earth’s biosphere”. Anyone ever wondered why we aren’t told of these remarkable studies? There are many studies and scientists that thoroughly agree with this statement but we wouldn’t know it!

And before anyone says that Global Warming ‘Sceptics’ are funded by oil companies (a small number of studies have been), it must be stated: if one side of this story is guilty of receiving loads of funding by those with vested interests, it is the Global Warming proponents! Government funding is how the entire ‘climate beast’ really built its’ industry.

More political implications…

Don Young, the Former Chairman, House Resources Committee states, “The environment is being used for a power struggle, used for centralised government, used to make a one-world government, and if you don’t think this is occurring, just see what’s happening in the US, this is an awakening call, that we are facing a battle against those who want to destroy a great United States of America”.

This statement should strike a chord with those aware of the UN’s position in global politics. They are an international body hell-bent on getting countries signed onto the Kyoto Protocol to relinquish their sovereignty, (through Cap & Trade/ Carbon Tax schemes) to this potential international ruler of nations. The ‘Climate Change’ issue illustrates clearly that the UN has an agenda to start with, then they send home delegates from member countries to implement their policies. But, above all this, Russia and China are not signed onto the Kyoto Protocol, so they can continue polluting regardless, making the efforts to cut emissions by those bounded by Kyoto, totally pointless anyway. The Kyoto Protocol is really about destroying the economies of the stronger more developed nations, and the environment is the excuse to do it!

The economic effects of ‘Climate Change’ legislation will be devastating. By its very nature it will crush small businesses, which won’t be able to cover the costs, allowing multi-nationals the monopolies they crave, wipe out the middle classes since only the rich will be able to afford commodities and the so-called ‘eco lifestyle’. We will be left with very rich aristocratic rulers and poverty for most of humanity, which equals enslavement.

As US Senator James Inhofe put it in 2007, “Offsets & credits are gimmicks used by the wealthy so they don’t have to change their lifestyles”.

Carroll Quigley, author of Tragedy and Hope, who, from within, had access to secretive world government conspiratorial documents and records said on page 324 of his book, “The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central bankers of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences”.

It is for these reasons people should be very weary of propaganda manufactured by certain exclusive clubs. Bilderberg, CFR, Trilateral Commission, UN, Club of Rome. The list continues but this is the truth of the ‘Climate Change’ story!

round_table05_01

This diagram sums it up nicely!

– BDL1983