Might is Reality, but is it Right?

might_is_right
Is it?

We often hear the phrase ‘Might is Right’ among those who know about ‘Race’ and ‘The Jew’.  So what exactly does this phrase mean? Is Might Right? What are we trying to describe when using this phrase?

This is what I think:

There are two lines of thought which need to be defined here:

1.)    We can be talking about what is natural, i.e. Nature. All true philosophies are coherent with nature’s law; otherwise they eventually crumble under the weight of their internal contradictions. Nature is what it is; therefore Nature represents the forces of natural selection, survival of the fittest etc. Whatever occurs in Nature is natural, whether it is a desirable force or not. It just is.

2.)    We could also be talking about a ‘Moral Code’ of right and wrong. In a technical sense, ‘right and wrong’ are abstract concepts which Nature pays no regard to. But this is only in a technical sense, since we are natural beings and have developed ethical codes by which we conduct our lives. For example: we don’t go murdering people, because it is wrong and unethical, and we do help people in need, because it is the decent thing to do. It’s all just basic common sense ‘right and wrong’.

The contradiction I see in the phrase ‘Might is Right’ is that ‘Might’ translates into ‘Force’, which is what governs the natural world, while the other half of the phrase says that it is ‘Right’. When we judge something to be right or wrong, we do so by our own moral concept of what right and wrong is. Nature doesn’t pay much regard to whether we like something or not. Whatever is meant to happen happens. If a good strong person gets struck down with a disease and dies an undeserved early death, is that ‘right’? Of course it isn’t, but Nature allowed it to happen. Clearly, we judge whether something is right or wrong by our own moral and ethical standards. Therefore, ‘Might’ is not necessarily ‘Right’, but it is most definitely ‘Reality’. The phrase ‘Might is Right’ is worded misleadingly and draws from each of the two lines of thought outlined above, respectively.

Does this mean that we National Socialists, who believe in Nature as our god, are bad, horrible people? Do we want cruel, brutal, and unjust things dealt by Nature to happen to unfortunate beings? Of course we don’t. We simply acknowledge that we are a part of Nature, and we will never master Nature. How arrogant and conceited would we have to be to believe that we know better than Nature? Nature created everything on this earth and is therefore the ultimate boss! How can we say that Nature’s seemingly random acts of cruelty and unfairness aren’t done for some unknown reason, like a ‘cruel-to-be-kind’ method of assisting a species to evolve upwardly? The point is: we don’t know all the mysteries or the reasoning of Nature. She is a mysterious creature who clearly has some different methods when compared to our ‘Moral Code of Ethics’ developed by us specifically. Our moral code only applies among our White Race, is unique to us, and in an overall sense, it is how we would desire Nature to be; i.e. fair, just, decent, equitable etc. The fact that Nature doesn’t reflect only us, but also everything else she created, is why we are outraged by some seemingly unjust natural occurrences.

National Socialists believe in ‘Reality’. Nature is our boss, our godhead if you like. Everything and everyone is a part of Nature’s great mysterious plan, whether we like it or not!

Sometimes ‘Might is Right’ according to morals and ethics, and other times it is cruel and brutal.

‘Might is Reality’.

That is the truth.

Right or wrong, there’s no escaping it!

Nature is God.

88

SIEG HEIL!!!!

– BDL1983

THE INFINITY PARADOX & OUR PERCEPTION OF REALITY…..

The concept of infinity is one of the most baffling concepts ever conceived in human thought. The idea that something can continue ‘infinitely’, without any starting point or ending point is beyond the capacity of human comprehension. No-one can explain it because the infinity concept destroys our entire understanding of what we perceive as reality…. None of even the most incredible minds in all of history have come up with adequate explanations of ‘infinity’ and why it contradicts our perceived reality!! This is because we do not understand the true nature of our existence, what put us here, and why we exist….. Why does the world exist as it does, or the universe for that matter? What is the true nature of our reality? Can our minds even fathom it? Or can we only establish for certain that we don’t understand absolute reality?

infinite

These questions are fascinating to think about when you’re in the right mood. I believe that humans in their current state cannot ever fathom the true nature of reality and existence. It is beyond our comprehension. I believe we CAN establish that we don’t understand the true nature of reality; but that is where it ends…… Here’s how I see things:

The perceivable reality in front of us is a 3D world. We perceive distance, direction, force, speed, sound, time (I know; this is the 4th dimension…), weight, hot, cold and on and on…… For the purpose of this argument I’m going to use distance and time as my measurable mediums. Distance is a finite and numerically definable quantity in our everyday world. If something is 4 kilometres down the road or 35 millimetres away, we can establish a relative sense of how far away the object in question is….. This is simple logic. The same idea applies when analysing how we think of time intervals. It is all relative in a finite sense. As long as we keep our thought processes within our everyday finite reality; distance and time make sense to us!

Now take distance and time, and apply ‘infinity’ to them.

starrynight

For ‘distance’, picture yourself on a dark starry night pointing directly upwards. If our perceived 3D reality was the absolute truth, then we could in theory travel an infinite distance in that direction and NEVER stop or reach an end point; effectively heading for infinity. But where is infinity? Our minds cannot properly fathom this concept. If you went the longest distance into the universe it still wouldn’t matter because according to our finite understanding of reality, you could always travel one millimetre further! This is where I think various scientists like to promote the idea of the universe having a non-linear shape, thereby “explaining” away the ‘infinite universe’ concept. What they can NEVER explain is the fact that if the universe has a non-linear shape (curved) and ‘point to point’ distance (a straight line) is a finite concept and true throughout the universe (as we understand it here on earth), then what’s to stop something heading DIRECTLY STRAIGHT until it leaves THIS universe? I don’t think there is any way humans can ever really understand infinite space….

Our ‘universal’ understanding of reality tells us that there cannot be an end-point in outer space; therefore it MUST continue infinitely; while our earthly perception (being finite) tells us there MUST be an end-point somewhere in space; ENTER THE INFINITY PARADOX!

alienplanet

If humans could comprehend infinity, then we could answer the following:

Q. What is the smallest/longest possible distance? A. Neither question can be answered finitely…. How long is a piece of string?…… It could be infinitely short (tending to zero length), or infinitely long. Both are outside our realm of real understanding…. This is where calculus enters the equation; to mathematically express the infinity concept so it can be applied to various engineering and scientific problems.

It’s the same deal with the concept of time. When did time begin? HOW could time have a beginning point? It is a finite relative concept as we perceive it. If you could go back to a theoretical beginning point for ‘time’, what would prevent you from going back before this point, if our current perception of ‘time’ is absolute truth?

I think I’ve made my point here…… The fact that a concept such as infinity exists and is beyond our comprehension proves that we do not understand the absolute true nature of reality! If we did understand absolute reality, then everyday quantities like distance and time would make perfect sense in a UNIVERSAL way, not just as we use them in their finite sense……

Another concept which is mind-boggling is that of our individual consciousness. What is it that creates our individual conscious awareness? Religious people say it’s God and that they know all about this ‘God’ character, therefore we should all listen to them…. I say we don’t know what this creative force is and that our current level of understanding is not high enough for us to be able to define it. But I do believe there IS some ‘higher creative force’ of the universe that somehow and for some reason put things how they are……. We just don’t know what it is! When we hear stories of reincarnation and out-of-body-experiences/near-death-experiences; maybe these phenomena are related to the person’s conscious perception entering another realm of reality? I really don’t know but this sort of stuff is interesting to think about!

outerspace

Q. Where is humanity at when it comes to raising its level of consciousness and striving for a higher understanding of reality?

A. Almost all of humanity has been on a downward path lately…. The coloured races have never really been in the game to start with. Most of the White race has degenerated, but within it there still lies that all-important seed of creative thought and upward thinking which only the best still have…. If you agree with the spirit of intellectual inquiry and idealism, then you are among the most worthwhile people of our race! If you are non-white, try supporting these ideals for your own race too……

– Brett