Tag Archives: Section 18C

1984 Was 30 Years Ago…..

It was more than just a novel.

It was more than just a novel.

Any intelligent person living in the year 2014 could be mistaken for thinking it was the 1984 George Orwell was talking about. All one has to do is watch some TV (Big Brother) news to see what I mean. You think I’m exaggerating? Well, I’ll explain it from the perspective of an independent thinker looking at how retarded some of the stuff people call news really is. This time I have some specific craziness to report from the land of the “fair go,” otherwise known as Australia.

Most mornings I usually turn on the TV to see what the Jews are telling everyone to parrot. This morning was no exception. The channel was ABC Jews 24, the more “intellectual news-type of channel,” where the presenters try their best to put a more “likeable” spin on whatever Jewish bullshit they are trying to make you accept. They do a really shitty job if you happen to be someone who’s tuned into “the Jew” and what he’s up to – trust me!

Anyway, this morning happened to be what I’d call the worst dose of ABC Jews 24 I’ve ever seen. Apart from just going on about all the usual gay marriage, feminism, racism, aboriginal suffering, underprivileged this, underprivileged that, and whatever other assorted whinging they felt like dreaming up, they also went on about the three topics of “Homegrown Terrorism“, the “Section 18C – Racial Discrimination Act“, and how the government needs to “survey and keep tabs on all your internet, phone, email, social-media activity etc,” just to keep you safe of course.

thought police

Stop for a minute and think about how all of a sudden, here in Australia, they are using the Jew-controlled governments own channel to try to blur these three topics together. It sounds exactly like the sort of shit they always bang on about in the US, only they don’t officially have the “Section 18C – Racial Discrimination Act” style of “Free Speech” limitation yet. “Free Speech,” or some remnant thereof, is about the only concept stopping the US going 100% into “hate-crime mode” against whitey.

Anyway, we (Australia) have had the “Section 18C – Racial Discrimination Act” for a while now. It’s only been used against Fredrick Toben, Brendon O’Connell, and a partial truth-speaker in the mainstream, Andrew Bolt, as far as I know. Where this stuff gets crazy is when they start going on about the endless surveillance necessary to keep us safe from apparent “homegrown terrorists”. The only “homegrown terrorists,” as the Jew news likes to label them, are potentially the Muslims which the Jew government has thrown the doors wide open to. The logical solution, which we are not allowed to follow due to Jewish Marxism, would be to shut the doors and deport the Muslims who are already here. They don’t belong no matter how hard the do-gooders pretend they do and everyone secretly knows it (don’t fucking lie to me)! It would seem that what the Jew government plans on doing is extending the definition of a “homegrown terrorist” to anyone who dares disagree with the politically-correct dogma of the Jewish system. We all know that they will do this eventually, but now it seems it’s the right time for them to announce and then gradually infuse their idea of the “terrorist next door” among the population.

An obvious, but often overlooked point regarding the “homegrown terrorist” scenario, is that while our wingnut Prime Minister Tony Abbott pretends to be concerned about Muslim terrorism, he and all his fellow criminals in parliament simultaneously invite them into our country because we are apparently all the same (the Jews told him so). Tony “Umm Arrr” Abbott knows damn well that it isn’t Muslims who are capable of, or responsible for any of the significant acts of “terrorism”. Whenever it’s “big TV mass-media style Muslim Terrorism“, we know it’s always really the Mossad in conjunction with the international Jewish criminal network pulling a false flag blaming them. But what the hell? No-one seems to notice, so I guess when everyone’s as thick as a fucking brick, why not impose Orwellian laws on them? Most probably deserve it anyway, I won’t deny that!

Just in case anyone is unclear on where I stand:

I am a righteous political dissident and I believe I have a right to be one. If not, I’ll fucking fight for it regardless.

I do not, nor will I ever condone any acts of “terrorism”.

If people still capable of independent thought are labelled as “terrorists”, then we are truly fucked without divine intervention. This is exactly the sort of “totalitarian nightmare system” Orwell described in his eerily prophetic book, 1984.

Good ol' fashioned "Double-Think" is still in fashion amongst the unthinking  herd....

Good ol’ fashioned “Double-Think” is still in fashion among the unthinking herd….

The modern world (controlled by Judaic thought) is an exact 180 degrees from the truth, and therefore people quite literally believe the sort of blatant “double-think” foisted upon them by the Jews and their fucked system.

If you think I’m joking then watch this SBS ad and take note. They say at the end that “without all our differences, we wouldn’t all be the same.” It is truly scary that anyone could watch that and not see it for the total contradiction in logic that it is, but there you go!

Jewish logic:

Without all our differences” – this acknowledges that we are all DIFFERENT.
We wouldn’t all be the same” – this says that we are all the SAME!
It doesn’t take a genius to see that if we are all different, then we can’t all be the same. The Jew tells you one thing, then says the exact opposite is also true – textbook “DOUBLE-THINK!”

past present future

The only bit we can change is the “future” bit. It is up to us.

SOME PEOPLE ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS – You’re all equal, but only as a brain-dead proletariat! So, don’t worry all you Jew-loving multicultural idiots out there; just remember that Big Brother (the Jew) loves you, and you must love him, and you will, provided you never THINK or inquire as to how he become MORE EQUAL THAN YOU!

I bet Mr Big Brother Jew-boy would like to make us "unpersons"!

I bet Mr Big Brother Jew would like to make us “unpersons”, then he could talk about his bravery……. The brave hook nosed weasel – that’s a laugh and a half!

Here’s an appropriate concluding song by Jethro Tull – “Thick as a Brick”, it says it all:

WAKE UP, IT’S NOT 1984 ANYMORE……

– BDL1983(4)

“Holocaust Denier” (Truth-teller) Frederick Toben backs George Brandis’ plans for discrimination law

From The Sydney Morning Herald (check the comments on the SMH article for a laugh):

Holocaust denier Frederick Toben has strongly backed the Abbott government’s plans to water down race hate laws, describing them as a welcome challenge to “Jewish supremacism” in Australia.

In an explosive submission to Attorney-General George Brandis’ review of the Racial Discrimination Act, obtained by Fairfax Media, Mr Toben congratulated the government for its attempt to rectify what he describes as a “flawed law, which only benefits Jewish-Zionist-Israeli interests”.

His comments drew immediate anger in the Jewish community, which has warned that the government’s plans for Section 18C of the act will open the door to “vilification on a massive scale”.

Mr Toben said Senator Brandis – who famously defended people’s “right to be a bigot” – had incorrectly claimed the need for reform of the Racial Discrimination Act was about free speech and the conviction of News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt under 18C.

Frederick Toben - Truth Teller

Frederick Toben – Truth Teller

“The essence of what the RDA Section 18C is all about and why it needs to be repealed is that the so-called ‘Bolt law’ is in effect a ‘Holocaust’ protection law,” Mr Toben wrote.

“The ‘Bolt law’ case was used in an attempt to hide this Holocaust matter and to make it a free expression issue. The trap set for the multiculturalists in Australia by Jewish interests, who designed Section 18C, is that the sole aim of this section has always been to legally protect … the Holocaust-Shoah narrative.”

Senator Brandis distanced the government from Mr Toben’s support on Tuesday, describing him as a “nutter”.

“I’ve never read anything that Mr Toben has said but I’m aware of his views from press reports and views I’ve heard attributed to Mr Toben are absolute rubbish,” he said.

“I don’t agree with Mr Toben but I do agree with President Barack Obama who said last week in relation to the Donald Sterling case: ‘when people, when ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don’t have to do anything, you just let them talk’.”

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Australia-Israel and Jewish Affairs Council, and the Zionist Federation condemned Mr Toben but said it was the government’s proposal that would allow him to freely peddle his views.

Mr Toben, a German-born Australian, was found to be in breach of discrimination laws in 2003. He went to jail in 2009 for defying Federal Court orders to remove material from his website that claimed there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz, and describing the murder of millions of Jews during World War II as the “Holocaust myth”.

Read More

Interesting.

“His comments drew immediate anger in the Jewish community”

No surprise there. Jews always get a bit touchy when the truth is involved!

Senator Brandis distanced the government from Mr Toben’s support on Tuesday, describing him as a “nutter”.

“I’ve never read anything that Mr Toben has said but I’m aware of his views from press reports and views I’ve heard attributed to Mr Toben are absolute rubbish,” he said.

He has never read anything that Frederick Toben has said, but Mr Brandis knows that his views are “absolute rubbish” and that Frederick is a “nutter”! Yep, that’s really sound logic Mr Brandis. Typical ‘liberal’ logic in fact!

“I don’t agree with Mr Toben but I do agree with President Barack Obama who said last week in relation to the Donald Sterling case: ‘when people, when ignorant folks want to advertise their ignorance, you don’t have to do anything, you just let them talk’.”

Then why don’t the organised Jewish groups simply allow Frederick to express his “ignorance” openly and publicly? After all, anyone who doubts the officially sanctioned Holocaust story is clearly a nutter, right?

Well consider this:

It is illegal in 16 European countries to question the official Holocaust story! I wonder why? The truth is that the Jews don’t want questions being asked because all they have to back up their story is lying so-called “eye-witnesses” and the obligatory emotional banter. If you investigate the Holocaust story honestly and objectively you’ll find no actual substance whatsoever supporting the official version of events. It is a big Jewish fairytale about how much of a victim they always are, meanwhile these same people are running all the banks, mass-media, governments, and education systems throughout the ‘West’. Go figure…..

Truth does not fear investigation, nor does it require force of law to uphold it! Lies do, and that’s exactly what the Holocaust is!

Don’t be scared to think for yourself!

– BDL1983

Racial Discrimination Act changes would allow Holocaust denial – About Time I Say!!

From The Age:

Rattenbury

Gaylord nancy-boy Shane Rattenbury thinks “free-speech” with certain limitations is still “free speech”….. What? And I’m a vegetarian who eats meat!

Holocaust denial and racial abuse on public transport could be allowed in Australia under proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act, Greens MLA Shane Rattenbury has warned.

Removing section 18c of the act could also cause the country’s repution abroad to suffer, akin to the fallout from the 2005 riots at Cronulla, violence against Indian students in Melbourne and the nation’s treatment of asylum seekers.

In a submission responding to an exposure draft released by Attorney-General George Brandis, Mr Rattenbury argues repealing clauses that make it illegal to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the grounds of race would set back Australia’s multicultural progress.

The changes have received wide-ranging and sustained criticism, including from some government MPs and cultural and religious groups around Australia.

Mr Rattenbury plans to seek amendments to the ACT’s own Discrimination Act to outlaw the behaviour if the Commonwealth changes go ahead.

He said the current laws placed only a minor and justifiable limitation on free speech and concerns were “hyperbolic and unwarranted”. 

“My view is that if the changes are introduced and passed, they will not result in any increase in genuine and constructive free speech in Australia,” Mr Rattenbury said in the four-page submission.

“However, they will ‘dog-whistle’ to an unattractive underbelly of racism, promoting behaviour that will erode tolerance and harmony in Australia and cause significant mental, psychological and possible physical suffering to ethnic and religious minorities.”

A proposal measuring the effect of the act to be determined by the standards of a reasonable member of the community defeats the purpose of discrimination provisions, he argued.

Read More

Holocaust denial?

Yep, I deny it because it’s a crock of shit.

Mr Rattenbury argues repealing clauses that make it illegal to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the grounds of race would set back Australia’s multicultural progress.

Did anyone ever ask us (white Australians) if we wanted “multicultural progress”? Of course not. That’s because Democracy is full of shit. It is really just a system of Jewish dictatorship disguised as a system which gives everyone a “fair go”. Puke.

He said the current laws placed only a minor and justifiable limitation on free speech and concerns were “hyperbolic and unwarranted”. 

Don’t bullshit me Mr. Rattenbury. It’s either “free speech” or it isn’t. There are no middle grounds. Which is it? Arsehole

genuine and constructive free speech

This is code for politically correct speech. As long as the Jews, minorities, and white liberal arseholes agree with it, you can say it. If not, they want you to shut up. What a joke.

“However, they will ‘dog-whistle’ to an unattractive underbelly of racism, promoting behaviour that will erode tolerance and harmony in Australia and cause significant mental, psychological and possible physical suffering to ethnic and religious minorities.”

What about the unavoidable psychological and physical suffering (I.e. rape/violent crime) the White MAJORITY will have to tolerate in order to embrace this wonderful multicultural society? Once again, no consideration for Whites. Although, this really comes as no surprise from the Jewish system’s news rags.

I don’t know how much more obvious all this shit has to be before Whites wake up to it.

Thanks to Benjamin Garland for sending me this article. Check out Ben’s work on the Daily Stormer and his personal site, The End Of Zion.

click to visit

Click to visit

– BDL1983

We All Know What These Jews Want…….

From Australian Jew News:

IMG_9837a

SHADOW attorney-general Mark Dreyfus (JEW pictured above) has lashed out at the country’s top lawmaker George Brandis, describing as “extraordinary” a proposal to make inciting racial hatred a criminal offence as a proxy for Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which the government appears set to water down.

Dreyfus told The AJN Brandis’ proposal to tweak Section 80.2A of the Commonwealth Criminal Code was recognition of the gaping hole a repeal of 18C – which outlaws speech or actions “reasonably likely … to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin” – would create, and accused his opposite number of failing to understand the distinction between civil protection and criminal offence.

“Criminal law is the strongest form of legal sanction we have as a society, and it’s extraordinary that Senator Brandis would express concerns about the effect of Section 18C on ‘free speech’ and ‘liberty’, only to mark out some of the conduct regulated by Section 18C as a new federal crime,” Dreyfus said.

“It appears that Senator Brandis doesn’t understand the distinction between civil protections and criminal offences. If he did he would not be suggesting that expanding the Criminal Code could be a substitute for Section 18C.”

In its current form, 80.2A outlaws violence against groups “distinguished by race, religion, nationality, national or ethnic origin or political opinion”, but not racial vilification, with Brandis describing the section as “probably too narrowly drawn”.

He told The AJN there were no plans to repeal 18C, only “that language which constitutes an unreasonable limitation on freedom of speech”.

“I have been very careful in my language because I am, of course, intensely conscious of the sensitivities of this issue. It is a shame that Mr Dreyfus has not been equally careful in his,” Brandis said.

Read More

Yes indeed, we all know what these Jews want – us to shut-up and do nothing out of fear of criminal prosecution for ‘racial vilification’, whether it be under Section 18C or a new twist of the Commonweath Criminal Code! It makes no difference what legal mumbo-jumbo they cloak this bullshit in! I hate it when a Jew like Dreyfus pretends to be horrified when we know perfectly well that it is the Jews behind all this ‘racial vilification’ crap anyway. Why would they care if it was upgraded to a criminal offence as opposed to civil? Love for the Goyim?

Get outta here with that crap you lying Kikes!

– BDL1983