We’ve all heard the old argument of Nature versus Nurture – Race versus Environment. It’s a valid and relevant argument to have. The problem is that, like everything else, the Jews have injected their poison into it.
The prevailing ideology of today, used by Jews and their liberal lackeys in academia, is that there is no such thing as race and even if there is, then it is due to environmental factors alone. For the Jew, as the eternal racial-integrationalist of the west, there simply cannot be any such thing as real racial differences, otherwise we have a clear and logical reason to live separate of other races. The Jewish motivation is obvious: they want white people to racially mix themselves out of existence, so they target our countries for integration/ multiculturalism, while they don’t really care about the non-white countries because they pose no threat to Jewish plans of world domination. One of the original proponents of the “no such thing as race” idea was the Jew Franz Boaz, and you better believe it – the Jews in academia and their lackeys latched onto this “theory”! It has been turned into a modern Jewish form of racial “gospel” where if you disagree with it, then you are an evil racist.
Anyway, here’s a bit of crap from Jew Franz Boaz’s wikipedia article showing how this “groundbreaking” Jew miraculously disproved everything anyone had said before about the obvious biological and scientific truth of race:
In a series of groundbreaking studies of skeletal anatomy he showed that cranial shape and size was highly malleable depending on environmental factors such as health and nutrition, in contrast to the claims by racial anthropologists of the day that held head shape to be a stable racial trait. Boas also worked to demonstrate that differences in human behavior are not primarily determined by innate biological dispositions, but are largely the result of cultural differences acquired through social learning. In this way, Boas introduced culture as the primary concept for describing differences in behavior between human groups, and as the central analytical concept of anthropology.
So basically, health and nutrition is why my skull shape and physique is White Nordic European, but I could have acquired a Negro shaped skull through different health and nutritional practices?
What an absolute load of shit!
If skull shape is so malleable then why do we see such obvious consistency of skull shape in one race and a completely different shape in another race?
Answer – the other racial anthropologists of Boaz’s day were correct – head shape is a stable racial trait – and Boaz is a lying Jew!
If head shape were not a stable trait, then no racial identification could be made from ancient burial sites. Do we see confusion here?
No, not a bit. Any anthropologist could identify the race of the person by skull shape in no time! It deserves repeating: Boaz is a lying Jew and a contributor of nothing but deception to the field of racial science and anthropology!
The same bullshit Jewish lying continues today with the likes of Jared Diamond promoting all the same propaganda about race not existing and environment/nurture being the only factor responsible for different achievements among different human populations.
Do you think there are any biological/racial factors involved here:
I shouldn’t really have to answer the above question, but seriously – if someone showed you pictures of leopards, lions, and tigers and told you that they were biologically the same and it was only the environment that made them different; would you believe them? Of course not, and that’s because it’s bullshit.
Boaz and Diamond are Jewish bullshit artists to state the bleeding obvious!
Anyway, enough of the Jewish liars for now. Let’s be honest and analyse this rationally. Is it Race or is it Nurture? Clearly it’s both and anyone with common sense will understand what I’m talking about here:
1.) Take any homogeneous racial group, divide it up, and place all the different groups in the same environment. What would you logically expect? Same race, same environment, equals very similar outcome, pretty much the same.
2.) Take any homogeneous racial group, divide it up, and place all the different groups in different environments. What would you logically expect? Same race, different environment, equals an outwardly different outcome, but with inner similarities bound uniquely to the biological character of the unique racial group involved. This is exactly the reason why when you look at the achievements of the white race in all different environments (mid-east, Europe, Africa) you see progressive, inventive, and creative civilizations. It is also exactly the same reason why if you look to see what the black races have achieved, no matter what environment they are in, there is absolutely nothing of note beyond primitive savage tribal life. No civilization to speak of. No creative ability whatsoever.
3.) Take several different racial groups, keep them divided, and place them in the same environment, although separate obviously. What would you logically expect? Different race, same environment, equals different outcome. The easiest case example here is the African continent. Everywhere whites colonized we saw advanced, progressive, inventive civilizations popping up. Meanwhile the black races achieved nothing. There is no blaming the environment in this case because it is the same. It is 100% clear and obvious why the two races behaved completely different to each other, despite very similar environmental conditions – because the races are biologically and fundamentally different in nature! The Jews will say that whites were oppressing the blacks, but we know this is bullshit because the blacks were doing nothing before the white man appeared anyway!
4.) Different racial groups in different environments; this needs no explanation.
That’s it in a nutshell. I’ll leave it up to the reader to argue with others about the percentages of Race versus Environment, but I’ll tell you one thing that is clear: Race is a huge factor in this argument. Environment is definitely an important factor, but Race is the ultimate key factor to understanding not only this question, but understanding history. All of a sudden, history and everything occurring around you makes perfect sense when you understand Race!
Now that the argument of Race/Nature versus Environment/Nurture is all cleared up, we might like to see what a former Prime Minister of Britain said about race, and this man just so happened to be a Jew.
Take it away Mr Benjamin Disraeli:
“No one may be indifferent to the racial principle, the racial question. It is the key to world history. History is often confusing because it is written by people who did not understand the racial question and the aspects relevant to it… Race is everything, and every race that does not keep its blood from being mixed will perish. . . Language and religion do not determine a race–blood determines it.”
I don’t care that a Jew said that quote. It is still true and always will be. Besides, Jews don’t tell the truth very often, so make the most of it!!
An interesting point to finish with here is the fact that there has never been any such thing as a racially pure Jew. They have always been of a mixed-race stock which can probably be better described as a breed – in the Jews case – a Satanic breed.
What’s the natural reaction of an impure breed of human to one which is racially pure? An inbuilt instinct to destroy – that’s what. I think this is a major motivation of the Jew to encourage racial inter-mixture, because it drags everyone else down to their level. We should bear in mind that the Jew is not preserving his racial purity by mixing mainly with others of Jewish lineage. No, he is only preserving his “breed” and it’s virus-like characteristics.
Race is the truth.
Blood is what matters.
Stand up for your race.
Or die out.